| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, National Yang-Ming University, 155 Linong Street Section 2, Taipei 112, Taiwan, ROC
2 Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Chang-Gung University, 259 Wen-Hua 1st Road, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan, ROC
3 Institute of Microbiology and Biochemistry, National Taiwan University, 1 Roosevelt Road Section 4, Taipei 106, Taiwan, ROC
Correspondence
Shih-Tung Liu
cgliu{at}mail.cgu.edu.tw
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
) and is closely associated with many neoplastic disorders (Einhorn et al., 1970; Gunven et al., 1970; Johansson et al., 1970; Klein et al., 1970). Although EBV typically remains latent after infection of B lymphocytes, the virus must enter a lytic cycle to produce virus particles. During the onset of the lytic cycle, the virus expresses the proteins Rta and Zta, encoded by BRLF1 and BZLF1, respectively, to activate the genes required for the viral lytic cycle (Chevallier-Greco et al., 1986; Chiu et al., 2007; Feederle et al., 2000; Granato et al., 2006; Hardwick et al., 1988; Lu et al., 2006). Although the exact means by which the EBV lytic cycle is activated in vivo is unknown, activation in vitro occurs after latently infected cells are exposed to 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), calcium ionophores, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 or anti-IgG (Daibata et al., 1990; Faggioni et al., 1986; zur Hausen et al., 1978). TPA, anti-IgG and TGF-β1 are known to activate the ERK signal transduction pathway (Fahmi et al., 2000; Fenton & Sinclair, 1999; Gao et al., 2001; Satoh et al., 1999), which ultimately activates transcription of BZLF1 and the EBV lytic cycle (Borras et al., 1996; Flemington & Speck, 1990).
It is known that EBV must express Zta to activate its lytic genes (Chevallier-Greco et al., 1986; Chiu et al., 2007; Feederle et al., 2000). Earlier studies have established that Rta upregulates transcription of the Zta gene, BZLF1 (Adamson et al., 2000; Ragoczy et al., 1998; Zalani et al., 1996). This activation is associated with activation of the p38 and JNK signal transduction pathway, causing the phosphorylation of ATF1/2 and the activation of transcription through an ATF1/2 site in the ZII region of the promoter (Adamson et al., 2000). However, the exact means by which Rta activates these signal transduction cascades is unknown. In this study, we used a yeast two-hybrid analysis to show that Rta interacts with BRCA1-associated protein 2 (BRAP2, also known as IMP), a protein that is known to interact with the kinase suppressor of Ras 1 (KSR1) (Matheny et al., 2004). Müller et al. (2001) demonstrated that KSR1 functions as a scaffold, providing a platform for the phosphorylation of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 (Muller et al., 2001; Nguyen et al., 2002; Roy et al., 2002). However, BRAP2 appears to prevent KSR1 from interacting with the cytoplasmic membrane and homo-oligomerization, thus inhibiting the ERK signal transduction pathway (Chen et al., 2008; Matheny & White, 2006; Matheny et al., 2004). This study demonstrated that Rta prevents the binding of BRAP2 to KSR1, activating the ERK signal transduction pathway and the transcription of BZLF1 to influence the viral lytic cycle.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
; Delecluse et al., 1998), were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10 % fetal calf serum. Cells were treated with 30 ng TPA ml–1 and 3 mM sodium butyrate to induce the EBV lytic cycle (Chang & Liu, 2000; Davies et al., 1991; Luka et al., 1979).
Plasmids.
A DNA fragment containing the BRAP2 gene was PCR amplified using primers 5'-CGCGGATCCGAATCCATGAGTGTGTCACTGGTTGTTATCCG-3' and 5'-CGGGGTACCAAGCTTTCAGGGATGTCTGTTGCTCTGAAGG-3', and a human testis cDNA library (BD Clontech) as template. Plasmids pGEX-BRAP2 and pHA-BRAP2 were constructed by inserting this PCR fragment into the BamHI/SmaI sites in pGEX-4T1 (Amersham Biosciences) and BamHI/KpnI sites in pcDNA3-HA2, respectively. A plasmid expressing full-length BRAP2 fused to a glutathione S-transferase (GST) sequence at the N terminus (pGST-BRAP2) was constructed by inserting the PCR fragment into pENTR3C (Invitrogen) at the BamHI/EcoRI sites and transferring this fragment to pDEST27 using the Gateway system (Invitrogen). Plasmids that expressed deleted GST–BRAP2, including BN262, BC399 and B263/398, which contain the BRAP2 regions aa 1–262, 399–600 and 263–398, respectively, were constructed in a similar way. Plasmid pET-Rta contained BRLF1 transcribed from the T7 promoter (Chang et al., 2004). Plasmids pCMV-R and pCMV-Z contained BRLF1 and BZLF1, respectively, transcribed from the cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter (Chang et al., 1998; Hung & Liu, 1999). Plasmid pCMV-3 is an empty vector that was used to construct pCMV-R (Chang et al., 1998). Plasmid pHA-Rta is a plasmid that expresses haemagglutinin (HA)-tagged Rta (Chang et al., 2004). Plasmids pHA-RN415, pHA-RN315, pHA-RN190, pHA-R190/315, pHA-RC255, pHA-R255/415, pHA-RC361, pHA-RC416 and pHA-191/415, which express the regions aa 1–415, 1–315, 1–190, 190–315, 255–605, 255–415, 361–605, 416–605 and 191–415 of HA–Rta (Chang et al., 2004), respectively, were constructed to map the regions in Rta that interact with BRAP2. Plasmids pCDNA3-Flag-KSR1 (Zhang et al., 1997) and pSG/RNLSm (Hsu et al., 2005) express Flag-tagged KSR1 (Flag–KSR1; obtained from Deborah K. Morrison, NCI-Frederick, MD, USA) and an Rta protein with a mutated nuclear localization signal (NLS; obtained from Tsuey-Ying Hsu, 1 Jen-Ai Rd Section 1, Taipei 100, Taiwan, ROC), respectively. Plasmids pZp-Luc and pNS3 were constructed by inserting the –240 to +38 and –57 to +38 regions of the BZLF1 promoter into the HindIII/SmaI sites in pGL2-Basic (Promega), respectively.
Yeast two-hybrid screen.
Proteins that interacted with Rta were identified using a yeast two-hybrid screen with a bait plasmid, pR476, and a human testis cDNA library, according to a method described elsewhere (Chang et al., 2004).
Binding of Rta to BRAP2 in vitro.
An E. coli BL21(DE3)(pGEX-BRAP2) lysate was prepared and a GST pull-down assay was performed as described previously (Chang et al., 2004). Glutathione–Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Biosciences) were then added to the lysate to allow the binding of GST–BRAP2 to the beads. The beads (30 µl) were then added to an E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET-Rta) lysate (500 µl) or a lysate prepared from 293T cells transfected with a plasmid expressing Rta or its deletion derivatives. The reaction mixture was incubated on ice for 1 h. After the beads had been washed in RIPA buffer, electrophoresis sample buffer was added to elute the proteins from the beads by heating at 95 °C for 5 min. Rta was finally detected by immunoblotting. His–Rta was purified from E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET-Rta) and bound to Ni-NTA agarose beads (Qiagen). The beads were added to the E. coli BL21(DE3)(pGEX-BRAP2) lysate. The binding of GST–BRAP2 to the beads was detected by immunoblotting with anti-GST antibody.
Competitive binding of Rta and KSR1 to BRAP2.
293T cells (5x106) were transfected with 4 µg pGST-BRAP2, pCMV-R (0, 3, 6 or 12 µg) and 4 µg pCDNA3-Flag-KSR1. After 24 h of culture, lysates (500 µl) were prepared from the cells using a RIPA buffer without Triton X-100 and sodium deoxycholate. Glutathione–Sepharose beads (30 µl) were then added to the lysate prepared from cells that had been transfected with pGST-BRAP2. The mixture was mixed at 4 °C for 1 h. The beads were washed in RIPA buffer and then mixed with lysate from cells that had been transfected with pCMV-R. After they had been mixed and washed, the beads were finally mixed with lysate from cells that had been transfected with pCDNA3-Flag-KSR1. Glutathione–Sepharose beads were also added to a mixture that contained 500 µl each of the lysates from 293T cells transfected with 4 µg pGST-BRAP2 and pCDNA3-Flag-KSR1. His–Rta, purified from E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET-Rta), was then added to the lysate mixture. Proteins that were bound to the beads were eluted with electrophoresis sample buffer and analysed by immunoblotting.
Immunoprecipitation.
293(maxi-EBV) cells (5x106) were treated with TPA and sodium butyrate to induce the EBV lytic cycle. Co-immunoprecipitation of Rta and BRAP2 was performed with anti-Rta (1 : 500 dilution) (Argene) and mouse polyclonal anti-BRAP2 antibody (1 : 5000 dilution) as described previously (Chang et al., 2004). Immunoblotting was subsequently conducted to identify the co-immunoprecipitated proteins.
Indirect immunofluorescence analysis.
293(maxi-EBV) cells were transfected with pCMV-Z or treated with TPA and sodium butyrate for 24 h to induce expression of Rta. Cells were collected by centrifugation, plated on poly-L-lysine (Sigma)-coated coverslips and fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4 °C for 30 min. The cells were then incubated with anti-Rta monoclonal antibody (mAb) and rabbit anti-BRAP2 polyclonal antibody for 1 h, followed by Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibody and Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG polyclonal antibody (Molecular Probes). After 1 h of incubation, cells were stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Finally, cells were washed in PBS, mounted in Citifluor (Agar Scientific) and examined under a confocal laser-scanning microscope (model LSM 510 META; Zeiss). The rabbit anti-BRAP2 antibody was produced using synthesized pepticle (KLPSRKGRSKRGK).
Activation of the ERK signal transduction pathway by Rta.
293T cells transfected with pCMV-R were lysed using electrophoresis sample buffer 24 h after transfection. Proteins in the lysate were detected by immunoblotting. U0126 (10 µM; Cell Signalling) was added 4 h prior to lysate preparation to inhibit the ERK signal transduction pathway.
Immunoblot analysis.
Proteins were detected by immunoblotting as described previously (Chang et al., 2004). Proteins on the membrane were detected using primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies, and visualized using SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce). Anti-HA was purchased from Roche and anti-
-tubulin and anti-Flag mAbs from Sigma. Anti-β-actin mAb was purchased from Novus Biologicals. Rabbit anti-ERK1/2, anti-phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204), anti-MEK1/2 and anti-phospho-MEK1/2 (Ser217/221) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Rabbit anti-GST antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Mouse anti-Zta mAb was purchased from Argene. Anti-EA-D mAb was purchased from Millipore. Anti-BRAP2 antibody was produced in mice with bacterially expressed GST–BRAP2.
Transient transfection assay.
Plasmids (800 ng) were transfected into 1.5x105 293T cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Luciferase activity was measured using a luminometer (model LB593; Berthod) as described previously (Chang et al., 1998). Each sample was prepared in duplicate and each transfection experiment was repeated three times. The copy number of plasmids transfected into cells was determined by real-time PCR using a set of primers specific for the ampicillin-resistance gene (Chang & Liu, 2000). Luciferase activity was normalized to the copy numbers of plasmids.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
), to screen a human testis cDNA library. A total of 6x105 transformants was screened and 10 cellular proteins that interacted with Rta were identified. Sequencing analysis revealed that one of these proteins was BRAP2. A GST pull-down assay was subsequently performed using bacterially expressed GST and GST–BRAP2. GST or GST–BRAP2 bound to glutathione–Sepharose beads was mixed with lysate prepared from E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET-Rta) to confirm the interaction. After washing, proteins bound to the beads were eluted and analysed by immunoblotting with anti-Rta antibody. The results revealed that His–Rta in the lysate (Fig. 1a, lane 1) was pulled down by GST–BRAP2–glutathione–Sepharose beads (Fig. 1a, lane 3) but not by GST–glutathione–Sepharose beads (Fig. 1a, lane 2). In another set of experiments, His–Rta bound to Ni-NTA agarose beads was mixed with E. coli BL21(DE3)(pGEX-4T1) or E. coli BL21(DE3)(pGEX-BRAP2) lysate. Immunoblot analysis indicated that His–Rta bound to Ni-NTA agarose beads retained GST–BRAP2 in the E. coli BL21(DE3)(pGEX-BRAP2) lysate (Fig. 1b, lane 4). The binding was not caused by an interaction between GST–BRAP2 and the His tag in His–Rta, as an unrelated His-tagged protein, His–FenB (Lin et al., 1998), did not interact with GST–BRAP2 (data not shown). A negative control also indicated that the His–Rta–Ni-NTA agarose beads did not pull down GST (Fig. 1b, lane 3).
|
, lane 1) was immunoprecipitated by anti-Rta antibody (Fig. 2a, lane 3) and co-immunoprecipitated with BRAP2 by anti-BRAP2 antibody (Fig. 2a, lane 4) but not by anti-Flag antibody (Fig. 2a, lane 2). Additionally, BRAP2 in the lysate (Fig. 2b, lane 1) was immunoprecipitated by anti-BRAP2 antibody (Fig. 2b, lane 3) and co-immunoprecipitated with Rta by anti-Rta antibody (Fig. 2b, lane 4) but not by anti-Flag antibody (Fig. 2b, lane 2). These results showed that BRAP2 interacts with Rta in 293(maxi-EBV) cells.
|
). However, BRAP2 was detected only in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3a and e). Merged images showed that Rta and BRAP2 were co-localized in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3d and h). Similar co-localization was also observed in cells transfected with pCMV-Z (Fig. 3i–p), but not in cells that were latently infected by EBV (Fig. 3q–t).
|
) were transfected into 293T cells and lysates were prepared. Immunoblot analysis of these lysates confirmed that these proteins were expressed (Fig. 4b). GST–BRAP2–glutathione–Sepharose beads were then added to the lysates. Immunoblot analysis using anti-HA antibody indicated that the beads pulled down HA–Rta, HA–RN415, HA–RN315, HA–RN190, HA–RC255 and HA–RC416 (Fig. 4c, lanes 1–4, 6 and 8), indicating that the regions aa 1–190 and 416–605 in Rta interacted with BRAP2. However, the beads did not pull down proteins that contained the Rta regions aa 191–315 (HA–R191/315) and 255–415 (HA–R255/415) (Fig. 4c, lanes 5 and 7). Additionally, as expected, GST–glutathione–Sepharose beads did not pull down any of these Rta proteins (data not shown). A similar experiment with a GST fusion protein containing full-length or a segment of BRAP2 (Fig. 4e, lanes 2–5) revealed that Rta was pulled down by GST–BRAP2 (Fig. 4d, e, lane 8) and GST–BC399 bound to glutathione–Sepharose beads (Fig. 4d, e, lane 11). However, Rta was not pulled down by GST–BN262 or GST–B263/398 bound to glutathione–Sepharose beads (Fig. 4d), which contained the regions aa 1–262 (Fig. 4e, lane 9) and 263–398 (Fig. 4e, lane 10), respectively. Furthermore, KSR1, which was expressed from pCDNA3-Flag-KSR1 in 293T cells (Fig. 4f, lane 6), was pulled down by GST–BRAP2 and GST–BC399 bound to glutathione–Sepharose beads (Fig. 4f, lanes 8 and 11) but not by GST–BN262 or GST–B263/398 bound to glutathione–Sepharose beads (Fig. 4f, lanes 9 and 10). These results demonstrated that both Rta and KSR1 interacted with GST–BC399.
|
, lane 3). However, GST–glutathione–Sepharose beads did not pull down KSR1 (Fig. 5a, lane 2), confirming that KSR1 interacts with BRAP2. The binding of Flag–KSR1 to GST–BRAP2 was reduced by pre-incubating the GST–BRAP2–glutathione–Sepharose beads in lysate from cells transfected with 3 µg pCMV-R (Fig. 5a, lane 4). Pre-incubating the beads in lysate from cells transfected with 6 or 12 µg pCMV-R further reduced the binding of Flag–KSR1 to BRAP2 to a level that was undetectable by immunoblotting (Fig. 5a, lanes 5 and 6), indicating that Rta impeded the binding of Flag–KSR1 to BRAP2. Meanwhile, in a similar study, two lysates prepared from 293T cells that had been transfected separately with pCDNA3-Flag-KSR1 and pGST-BRAP2 were mixed in equal volumes. After adding glutathione–Sepharose beads, His–Rta purified from an E. coli lysate was then added to the lysate mixture. Concentrations up to 0.1 µM bacterially expressed His–Rta did not affect the interaction between Flag–KSR1 and GST–BRAP2 and binding of the proteins to glutathione–Sepharose beads (Fig. 5b, lanes 3–5), whilst adding 0.3 µM His–Rta decreased the amount of Flag–KSR1 that was retained by the beads (Fig. 5b, lane 6), showing that Rta dislodges KSR1 from BRAP2.
|
, lanes 2–4, 6 and 8), but promoted the phosphorylation of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 (Fig. 6a, lanes 1–4). Additionally, adding U0126, which inhibits the activity of MEK1/2, prevented the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 activated by Rta and the Rta NLS mutant (Fig. 6a, lanes 6 and 7). We also found that transfecting pHA-BRAP2 inhibited the phosphorylation of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 activated by Rta and the Rta NLS mutant (Fig. 6a, lanes 8 and 9). A similar study was also performed using BJAB, Akata, EBV-negative Akata and P3HR1 cells; the activation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation by Rta in these cell lines was less obvious than that in 293T cells (data not shown).
|
) and HA–RC361 (a protein that contains the C-terminal region of Rta from aa 361–605), influenced the phosphorylation of ERK1/2. Immunoblot analysis indicated that, although transfecting a plasmid expressing HA–R191/415, which does not interact with BRAP2, had little effect on the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (Fig. 6b, lane 4), transfecting a plasmid that expressed HA–RC361 increased the phosphorylation level of ERK1/2 (Fig. 6b, lane 5). Similar activation was also observed upon transfection of a plasmid that expressed HA–RN190 (Fig. 6b, lane 3). Co-expressing HA–RN190 and HA–RC361 also increased the phosphorylation levels of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 (Fig. 6b, lane 6). Furthermore, similar activation was also observed after co-expressing HA–RN190 and HA–RN416 (Fig. 4a and data not shown). The addition of U0126 did not prevent the phosphorylation of MEK1/2, but inhibited the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 activated by HA–RN190 and HA–RC361 (Fig. 6b, lanes 6 and 7). This study also found that expressing BRAP2 inhibited MEK and ERK phosphorylation activated by HA–RN190 and HA–RC361 (Fig. 6b, lane 8).
Activation of the BZLF1 promoter by Rta
Previous studies have established that BZLF1 transcription is closely associated with activation of the ERK signal transduction cascade (Fahmi et al., 2000; Fenton & Sinclair, 1999; Satoh et al., 1999). To determine whether Rta activates BZLF1 transcription via the ERK signal transduction pathway, pCMV-R and a BZLF1 reporter plasmid, pZp-Luc, were co-transfected into 293T cells. The BZLF1 promoter was activated by pCMV-R at a level about 10-fold higher than that achieved by pCMV-3 (Fig. 7a and b). Adding U0126 reduced the promoter activity by 56 % (Fig. 7a), suggesting that activation of the ERK signal transduction pathway by Rta is important for the transcription of BZLF1. Additionally, pNS3, in which the four TPA-response elements (TREs) and the ZII region in the BZLF1 promoter were deleted, was not activated by pCMV-R, indicating that TREs may be associated with the activation. However, transfecting a plasmid expressing HA–RN190 or HA–RC416 also activated BZLF1 transcription from pZp-Luc by 2.2-fold or 1.6-fold, respectively (Fig. 7b). Transfecting plasmids that expressed both fragments increased the promoter activity 3.3-fold (Fig. 7b). Adding U0126 inhibited transcription to the basal level, indicating the importance of Rta-induced ERK signal transduction in activating the transcription of BZLF1.
|
). Immunoblotting revealed that the transfection increased the expression levels of Zta and diffused early antigen (EA-D) (Fig. 8, lanes 2 and 3). Adding U0126, however, significantly lowered the level of Zta and EA-D expression, indicating that activation of the ERK signal transduction pathway by Rta is crucial for activation of the EBV lytic cycle.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
; Liu et al., 2006). The interaction between Rta and Rb releases E2F1 from Rb to affect cell-cycle progression (Swenson et al., 1999; Zacny et al., 1998). Rta also interacts with MCAF1, an Sp1-binding protein, to enhance Sp1-mediated transcription (Chang et al., 2005). This study found that Rta interacts with a KSR1-binding protein, BRAP2. The interaction was confirmed in vitro using a GST pull-down assay (Fig. 1) and in vivo by co-immunoprecipitation (Fig. 2). Confocal microscopy showed that Rta and BRAP2 co-localized in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3), which is consistent with the knowledge that BRAP2 is a cytoplasmic protein (Asada et al., 2004; Li et al., 1998).
As BRAP2 interacts with the NLS in BRCA1 and p21 to retain these two proteins in the cytoplasm (Asada et al., 2004; Li et al., 1998), we investigated whether expression of BRAP2 also retained Rta in the cytoplasm. To accomplish this, 293(maxi-EBV) cells were transfected with pHA-BRAP2 and treated with TPA and sodium butyrate. Confocal microscopy revealed that, although BRAP2 was expressed abundantly in the cell, the expression did not affect the localization of Rta and its ability to transactivate a promoter containing an Rta-response element (data not shown), showing that BRAP2 probably does not retain Rta in the cytoplasm to affect its nuclear functions. BRAP2 is also a ubiquitin E3 ligase (Matheny et al., 2004; Pai et al., 2007). However, we found that Rta, although conjugated by SUMO-1 (Chang et al., 2004), was not conjugated by ubiquitin (unpublished results), suggesting that BRAP2 does not influence the function of Rta via ubiquitination. Another important function of BRAP2 is its ability to bind to KSR1 to inhibit ERK signal transduction (Chen et al., 2008; Matheny et al., 2004). KSR1 is a scaffolding protein that facilitates the phosphorylation of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 in the ERK signal transduction cascade (Muller et al., 2001; Nguyen et al., 2002; Roy et al., 2002). However, BRAP2 prevents KSR1 homo-oligomerization and prevents it from associating with the cytoplasmic membrane to inhibit ERK signal transduction (Chen et al., 2008; Matheny et al., 2004). Therefore, we investigated whether Rta influenced the capacity of BRAP2 to inhibit ERK signal transduction. A mapping study found that Rta and KSR1 both interacted with the C-terminal 202 aa region in BRAP2 (Fig. 4). Thus, we suggest that Rta binds to BRAP2 to prevent the interaction between BRAP2 and KSR1, which activates the ERK signal transduction cascade. Furthermore, Rta activates the BZLF1 promoter through an ATF2 site in the ZII region (Adamson et al., 2000). Therefore, activation of the ERK signal transduction pathway by Rta may ultimately influence the transcription of BZLF1 through the activation of ATF2, a downstream target of the ERK signal transduction pathway (Morton et al., 2004; Ouwens et al., 2002). The first piece of evidence in support of this hypothesis is the fact that the binding capacity of GST–BRAP2–glutathione–Sepharose beads to KSR1 declined substantially when the beads were pre-incubated with cell lysates containing Rta (Fig. 5a); adding bacterially expressed His–Rta to a lysate mixture containing Flag–KSR1 and GST–BRAP2 also dislodged Flag–KSR1 from the GST–BRAP2–glutathione–Sepharose beads (Fig. 5b), indicating that Rta prevents the interaction between BRAP2 and KSR1. Secondly, the results of the immunoblot analysis showed that transfecting 293T cells with pCMV-R increased the degree of phosphorylation of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 (Fig. 6a). Finally, previous studies have established that TPA, anti-IgG and TGF-β1 activate BZLF1 transcription through the four TREs and the ZII region in the BZLF1 promoter (Adamson et al., 2000; Fenton & Sinclair, 1999; Ragoczy et al., 1998; Satoh et al., 1999). A transient transfection study revealed that the capacity of Rta to activate the mutant BZLF1 promoter without these sites (pNS3) was reduce substantially (Fig. 7a). Additionally, the fact that Rta-activated BZLF1 transcription is inhibited by U0126 (Fig. 7a) also supports the suggestion that Rta activates transcription via activation of the ERK signal transduction pathway. Notably, transient transfection analysis indicated that U0126 did not completely repress Rta-activated BZLF1 transcription (Fig. 7a), which is probably due to the fact that Rta also activates BZLF1 transcription via the p38 and JNK pathway (Adamson et al., 2000), and activation via these routes was unaffected by the U0126 treatment. We also found that expressing the two domains in Rta that interact with BRAP2 sufficiently increased the degree of phosphorylation of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 (Fig. 6b) and activated the BZLF1 promoter (Fig. 7b). Unlike intact Rta, transactivation of the BZLF1 promoter was completely inhibited by U0126 (Fig. 7b), implying that, unlike the full-length Rta, these two Rta fragments are not involved in activating the p38 and JNK signalling pathway to activate BZLF1 transcription. Previous studies have demonstrated that activation of ERK signal transduction by TPA, anti-IgG and TGF-β1 is crucial to activation of BZLF1 transcription and the EBV lytic cycle (Fahmi et al., 2000; Fenton & Sinclair, 1999; Satoh et al., 1999). The fact that U0126 reduced the capacity of Rta to activate expression of Zta and EA-D (Fig. 8) indicates that activation of the ERK signal transduction pathway by Rta is critical to EBV reactivation. Our results also explain why an NLS mutant of Rta was found previously to activate the EBV lytic cycle (Hsu et al., 2005).
This investigation found that Rta did not promote the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in three B-lymphocyte cell lines (Akata, BJAB and P3HR1) as much as in 293T cells (data not shown). There is a possibility that the ERK signal transduction pathway in these B lymphocyte cells is less responsive to BRAP2 inhibition, so Rta does not significantly activate the pathway in such cells. Earlier studies have demonstrated that Zta also activates the BRLF1 promoter by activating the ERK signal transduction cascade in epithelial cells (Chang et al., 2006), showing that both Rta and Zta influence ERK signal transduction to influence the EBV lytic cycle. As the EBV particles produced by epithelial cells exhibit a tropism towards B lymphocytes (Borza & Hutt-Fletcher, 2002; Guerreiro-Cacais et al., 2004), in which EBV latency is established, activation of the BZLF1 promoter by Rta through the ERK signal transduction pathway may be critical to viral lytic replication and to the infection of B lymphocytes in the B-lymphocyte/epithelial cell infection cycle.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Asada, M., Ohmi, K., Delia, D., Enosawa, S., Suzuki, S., Yuo, A., Suzuki, H. & Mizutani, S. (2004). Brap2 functions as a cytoplasmic retention protein for p21 during monocyte differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 24, 8236–8243.
Borras, A. M., Strominger, J. L. & Speck, S. H. (1996). Characterization of the ZI domains in the Epstein–Barr virus BZLF1 gene promoter: role in phorbol ester induction. J Virol 70, 3894–3901.[Abstract]
Borza, C. M. & Hutt-Fletcher, L. M. (2002). Alternate replication in B cells and epithelial cells switches tropism of Epstein–Barr virus. Nat Med 8, 594–599.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chang, L. K. & Liu, S. T. (2000). Activation of the BRLF1 promoter and lytic cycle of Epstein–Barr virus by histone acetylation. Nucleic Acids Res 28, 3918–3925.
Chang, L. K., Lee, Y. H., Cheng, T. S., Hong, Y. R., Lu, P. J., Wang, J. J., Wang, W. H., Kuo, C. W., Li, S. S. & Liu, S. T. (2004). Post-translational modification of Rta of Epstein–Barr virus by SUMO-1. J Biol Chem 279, 38803–38812.
Chang, L. K., Chung, J. Y., Hong, Y. R., Ichimura, T., Nakao, M. & Liu, S. T. (2005). Activation of Sp1-mediated transcription by Rta of Epstein–Barr virus via an interaction with MCAF1. Nucleic Acids Res 33, 6528–6539.
Chang, P. J., Chang, Y. S. & Liu, S. T. (1998). Role of Rta in the translation of bicistronic BZLF1 of Epstein–Barr virus. J Virol 72, 5128–5136.
Chang, Y., Lee, H. H., Chen, Y. T., Lu, J., Wu, S. Y., Chen, C. W., Takada, K. & Tsai, C. H. (2006). Induction of the early growth response 1 gene by Epstein–Barr virus lytic transactivator Zta. J Virol 80, 7748–7755.
Chen, C., Lewis, R. E. & White, M. A. (2008). IMP modulates KSR1-dependent multivalent complex formation to specify ERK1/2 pathway activation and response thresholds. J Biol Chem 283, 12789–12796.
Chevallier-Greco, A., Manet, E., Chavrier, P., Mosnier, C., Daillie, J. & Sergeant, A. (1986). Both Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-encoded trans-acting factors, EB1 and EB2, are required to activate transcription from an EBV early promoter. EMBO J 5, 3243–3249.[Medline]
Chiu, Y. F., Tung, C. P., Lee, Y. H., Wang, W. H., Li, C., Hung, J. Y., Wang, C. Y., Kawaguchi, Y. & Liu, S. T. (2007). A comprehensive library of mutations of Epstein–Barr virus. J Gen Virol 88, 2463–2472.
Daibata, M., Humphreys, R. E., Takada, K. & Sairenji, T. (1990). Activation of latent EBV via anti-IgG-triggered, second messenger pathways in the Burkitt's lymphoma cell line Akata. J Immunol 144, 4788–4793.[Abstract]
Davies, A. H., Grand, R. J., Evans, F. J. & Rickinson, A. B. (1991). Induction of Epstein–Barr virus lytic cycle by tumor-promoting and non-tumor-promoting phorbol esters requires active protein kinase C. J Virol 65, 6838–6844.
Delecluse, H. J., Hilsendegen, T., Pich, D., Zeidler, R. & Hammerschmidt, W. (1998). Propagation and recovery of intact, infectious Epstein–Barr virus from prokaryotic to human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 8245–8250.
Diehl, V., Henle, G., Henle, W. & Kohn, G. (1968). Demonstration of a herpes group virus in cultures of peripheral leukocytes from patients with infectious mononucleosis. J Virol 2, 663–669.
Einhorn, N., Klein, G. & Clifford, P. (1970). Increase in antibody titer against the EBV-associated membrane antigen complex in Burkitt's lymphoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma after local irradiation. Cancer 26, 1013–1021.[Medline]
Faggioni, A., Zompetta, C., Grimaldi, S., Barile, G., Frati, L. & Lazdins, J. (1986). Calcium modulation activates Epstein–Barr virus genome in latently infected cells. Science 232, 1554–1556.
Fahmi, H., Cochet, C., Hmama, Z., Opolon, P. & Joab, I. (2000). Transforming growth factor beta 1 stimulates expression of the Epstein–Barr virus BZLF1 immediate-early gene product ZEBRA by an indirect mechanism which requires the MAPK kinase pathway. J Virol 74, 5810–5818.
Feederle, R., Kost, M., Baumann, M., Janz, A., Drouet, E., Hammerschmidt, W. & Delecluse, H. J. (2000). The Epstein–Barr virus lytic program is controlled by the co-operative functions of two transactivators. EMBO J 19, 3080–3089.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fenton, M. & Sinclair, A. J. (1999). Divergent requirements for the MAPK(ERK) signal transduction pathway during initial virus infection of quiescent primary B cells and disruption of Epstein–Barr virus latency by phorbol esters. J Virol 73, 8913–8916.
Flemington, E. & Speck, S. H. (1990). Identification of phorbol ester response elements in the promoter of Epstein–Barr virus putative lytic switch gene BZLF1. J Virol 64, 1217–1226.
Gao, X., Ikuta, K., Tajima, M. & Sairenji, T. (2001). 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate induces Epstein–Barr virus reactivation via NF-
B and AP-1 as regulated by protein kinase C and mitogen-activated protein kinase. Virology 286, 91–99.[CrossRef][Medline]
Granato, M., Farina, A., Gonnella, R., Santarelli, R., Frati, L., Faggioni, A. & Angeloni, A. (2006). Regulation of the expression of the Epstein–Barr virus early gene BFRF1. Virology 347, 109–116.[CrossRef][Medline]
Guerreiro-Cacais, A. O., Li, L., Donati, D., Bejarano, M. T., Morgan, A., Masucci, M. G., Hutt-Fletcher, L. & Levitsky, V. (2004). Capacity of Epstein–Barr virus to infect monocytes and inhibit their development into dendritic cells is affected by the cell type supporting virus replication. J Gen Virol 85, 2767–2778.
Gunven, P., Klein, G., Henle, G., Henle, W. & Clifford, P. (1970). Epstein–Barr virus in Burkitt's lymphoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Antibodies to EBV associated membrane and viral capsid antigens in Burkitt lymphoma patients. Nature 228, 1053–1056.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hardwick, J. M., Lieberman, P. M. & Hayward, S. D. (1988). A new Epstein–Barr virus transactivator, R, induces expression of a cytoplasmic early antigen. J Virol 62, 2274–2284.
Hsu, T. Y., Chang, Y., Wang, P. W., Liu, M. Y., Chen, M. R., Chen, J. Y. & Tsai, C. H. (2005). Reactivation of Epstein–Barr virus can be triggered by an Rta protein mutated at the nuclear localization signal. J Gen Virol 86, 317–322.
Hung, C. H. & Liu, S. T. (1999). Characterization of the Epstein–Barr virus BALF2 promoter. J Gen Virol 80, 2747–2750.
Johansson, B., Klein, G., Henle, W. & Henle, G. (1970). Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-associated antibody patterns in malignant lymphoma and leukemia. I. Hodgkin's disease. Int J Cancer 6, 450–462.[CrossRef][Medline]
Klein, G., Geering, G., Old, L. J., Henle, G., Henle, W. & Clifford, P. (1970). Comparison of the anti-EBV titer and the EBV-associated membrane reactive and precipitating antibody levels in the sera of Burkitt lymphoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and controls. Int J Cancer 5, 185–194.[CrossRef][Medline]
Li, S., Ku, C. Y., Farmer, A. A., Cong, Y. S., Chen, C. F. & Lee, W. H. (1998). Identification of a novel cytoplasmic protein that specifically binds to nuclear localization signal motifs. J Biol Chem 273, 6183–6189.
Lin, G. H., Chen, C. L., Tschen, J. S., Tsay, S. S., Chang, Y. S. & Liu, S. T. (1998). Molecular cloning and characterization of fengycin synthetase gene fenB from Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 180, 1338–1341.
Liu, S. T., Wang, W. H., Hong, Y. R., Chuang, J. Y., Lu, P. J. & Chang, L. K. (2006). Sumoylation of Rta of Epstein–Barr virus is preferentially enhanced by PIASxβ. Virus Res 119, 163–170.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lu, C. C., Jeng, Y. Y., Tsai, C. H., Liu, M. Y., Yeh, S. W., Hsu, T. Y. & Chen, M. R. (2006). Genome-wide transcription program and expression of the Rta responsive gene of Epstein–Barr virus. Virology 345, 358–372.[CrossRef][Medline]
Luka, J., Kallin, B. & Klein, G. (1979). Induction of the Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) cycle in latently infected cells by n-butyrate. Virology 94, 228–231.[CrossRef][Medline]
Matheny, S. A. & White, M. A. (2006). Ras-sensitive IMP modulation of the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade through KSR1. Methods Enzymol 407, 237–247.[CrossRef][Medline]
Matheny, S. A., Chen, C., Kortum, R. L., Razidlo, G. L., Lewis, R. E. & White, M. A. (2004). Ras regulates assembly of mitogenic signalling complexes through the effector protein IMP. Nature 427, 256–260.[CrossRef][Medline]
Morton, S., Davis, R. J. & Cohen, P. (2004). Signalling pathways involved in multisite phosphorylation of the transcription factor ATF-2. FEBS Lett 572, 177–183.[CrossRef][Medline]
Müller, J., Ory, S., Copeland, T., Piwnica-Worms, H. & Morrison, D. K. (2001). C-TAK1 regulates Ras signaling by phosphorylating the MAPK scaffold, KSR1. Mol Cell 8, 983–993.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nguyen, A., Burack, W. R., Stock, J. L., Kortum, R., Chaika, O. V., Afkarian, M., Muller, W. J., Murphy, K. M., Morrison, D. K. & other authors (2002). Kinase suppressor of Ras (KSR) is a scaffold which facilitates mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 22, 3035–3045.
Ouwens, D. M., de Ruiter, N. D., van der Zon, G. C., Carter, A. P., Schouten, J., van der Burgt, C., Kooistra, K., Bos, J. L., Maassen, J. A. & van Dam, H. (2002). Growth factors can activate ATF2 via a two-step mechanism: phosphorylation of Thr71 through the Ras–MEK–ERK pathway and of Thr69 through RalGDS–Src–p38. EMBO J 21, 3782–3793.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pai, M. T., Tzeng, S. R., Kovacs, J. J., Keaton, M. A., Li, S. S., Yao, T. P. & Zhou, P. (2007). Solution structure of the Ubp-M BUZ domain, a highly specific protein module that recognizes the C-terminal tail of free ubiquitin. J Mol Biol 370, 290–302.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ragoczy, T., Heston, L. & Miller, G. (1998). The Epstein–Barr virus Rta protein activates lytic cycle genes and can disrupt latency in B lymphocytes. J Virol 72, 7978–7984.
Roy, F., Laberge, G., Douziech, M., Ferland-McCollough, D. & Therrien, M. (2002). KSR is a scaffold required for activation of the ERK/MAPK module. Genes Dev 16, 427–438.
Satoh, T., Hoshikawa, Y., Satoh, Y., Kurata, T. & Sairenji, T. (1999). The interaction of mitogen-activated protein kinases to Epstein–Barr virus activation in Akata cells. Virus Genes 18, 57–64.[CrossRef][Medline]
Swenson, J. J., Mauser, A. E., Kaufmann, W. K. & Kenney, S. C. (1999). The Epstein–Barr virus protein BRLF1 activates S phase entry through E2F1 induction. J Virol 73, 6540–6550.
Zacny, V. L., Wilson, J. & Pagano, J. S. (1998). The Epstein–Barr virus immediate-early gene product, BRLF1, interacts with the retinoblastoma protein during the viral lytic cycle. J Virol 72, 8043–8051.
Zalani, S., Holley-Guthrie, E. & Kenney, S. (1996). Epstein–Barr viral latency is disrupted by the immediate-early BRLF1 protein through a cell-specific mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 9194–9199.
Zhang, Y., Yao, B., Delikat, S., Bayoumy, S., Lin, X. H., Basu, S., McGinley, M., Chan-Hui, P. Y., Lichenstein, H. & Kolesnick, R. (1997). Kinase suppressor of Ras is ceramide-activated protein kinase. Cell 89, 63–72.[CrossRef][Medline]
zur Hausen, H., O'Neill, F. J., Freese, U. K. & Hecker, E. (1978). Persisting oncogenic herpesvirus induced by the tumour promotor TPA. Nature 272, 373–375.[CrossRef][Medline]
Received 7 May 2008;
accepted 9 June 2008.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |
