J Gen Virol Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 89 (2008), 2518-2530; DOI 10.1099/vir.0.2008/002915-0

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Table
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arita, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arita, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Arita, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, H.

Characterization of pharmacologically active compounds that inhibit poliovirus and enterovirus 71 infectivity

Minetaro Arita, Takaji Wakita and Hiroyuki Shimizu

Department of Virology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, 4-7-1 Gakuen, Musashimurayama-shi, Tokyo 208-0011, Japan

Correspondence
Minetaro Arita
minetaro{at}nih.go.jp


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Poliovirus (PV) and enterovirus 71 (EV71) cause severe neurological symptoms in their infections of the central nervous system. To identify compounds with anti-PV and anti-EV71 activities that would not allow the emergence of resistant mutants, we performed drug screening by utilizing a pharmacologically active compound library targeting cellular factors with PV and EV71 pseudoviruses that encapsidated luciferase-encoding replicons. We have found that metrifudil (N-[2-methylphenyl]methyl)-adenosine) (an A2 adenosine receptor agonist), N6-benzyladenosine (an A1 adenosine receptor agonist) and NF449 (4,4',4'',4'''-[carbonylbis[imino-5,1,3-benzenetriyl bis(carbonyl-imino)]] tetrakis (benzene-1,3-disulfonic acid) octasodium salt) (a Gs-{alpha} inhibitor) have anti-EV71 activity, and that GW5074 (3-(3, 5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzylidine-5-iodo-1,3-dihydro-indol-2-one)) (a Raf-1 inhibitor) has both anti-PV and anti-EV71 activities. EV71 mutants resistant to metrifudil, N6-benzyladenosine and NF449 were isolated after passages in the presence of these compounds, but mutants resistant to GW5074 were not isolated for both PV and EV71. The inhibitory effect of GW5074 was not observed in Sendai virus infection and the treatment did not induce the expression of OAS1 and STAT1 mRNA. Small interfering RNA treatment against putative cellular targets of GW5074, including Raf-1, B-Raf, Pim-1, -2, and -3, HIPK2, GAK, MST2 and ATF-3, did not consistently suppress PV replication. Moreover, downregulation of Raf-1 and B-Raf did not affect the sensitivity of RD cells to the inhibitory effect of GW5074. These results suggest that GW5074 has strong and selective inhibitory effect against the replication of PV and EV71 by inhibiting conserved targets in the infection independently of the interferon response.

A supplementary table showing the siRNA duplex used in this study is available with the online version of this paper.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Poliovirus (PV) is a small, non-enveloped virus with a single-stranded positive genomic RNA of about 7500 nt, belonging to the genus Enterovirus of the family Picornaviridae. PV is the causative agent of poliomyelitis, where the motor neurones are the major target (Bodian, 1949Down). The tropism of PV to the motor neurones is attributable in part to the expression of the PV receptor (PVR) (Crotty et al., 2002Down; Ida-Hosonuma et al., 2002Down; Koike et al., 1994Down; Ren & Racaniello, 1992Down). Enterovirus 71 (EV71) belongs to the genus Enterovirus but was classified into a different species from PV, Human enterovirus species A. EV71 is a causative agent of hand, foot and mouth disease and herpangina, but sometimes causes severe neurological diseases, such as brainstem encephalitis and poliomyelitis-like paralysis (Chumakov et al., 1979Down; McMinn, 2002Down; Wang et al., 2003Down). The case-severity rate of EV71 in an outbreak in Taiwan was <0.3 % (Ho et al., 1999Down), suggesting a high neuropathogenicity of EV71 as well as PV, which causes poliomyelitis in 0.1–1.0 % of infected individuals (reviewed by Minor, 1992Down). EV71 causes fatal pulmonary oedema and/or pulmonary haemorrhage in young children by destruction of the vasomotor and respiratory centres in the brain stem (Chang et al., 1999Down; Ho et al., 1999Down; Huang et al., 1999Down; Komatsu et al., 1999Down; Lum et al., 1998Down; Wang et al., 1999Down).

The viral replication machinery of PV requires numerous cellular factors to hijack the cellular process. For viral protein synthesis, recruitment of ribosome to the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) on the viral genome requires host factors polypyrimidine tract-binding protein (PTB), Unr, La, poly(rC)-binding protein 2 (PCBP2) and SRp20 that are not required for cap-dependent protein synthesis of cellular mRNA (Bedard et al., 2007Down; Hellen et al., 1993Down; Hunt et al., 1999Down; Meerovitch et al., 1993Down; Sanford et al., 2004Down; Walter et al., 1999Down), along with proteolytic modification of a translation initiation factor eIF4G by viral proteinase 2Apro to hijack the translation machinery from cap-dependent protein synthesis to viral protein synthesis (Gradi et al., 1998Down; Krausslich et al., 1987Down). For the replication process, membrane rearrangement utilizing ADP ribosylation factors (Arfs) and guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) (GBF1, BIG1/2) are required via direct and indirect interaction with viral 3A and 3CD proteins in coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) and PV infections (Belov et al., 2007Down; Wessels et al., 2006Down). Cellular signalling via extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and stress-activated protein kinases (SAPKs) affected replication and/or the release of progeny virus in CVB3 infection by an unknown mechanism (Esfandiarei et al., 2004Down; Luo et al., 2002Down; Si et al., 2005Down).

These cellular processes are promising targets for the development of effective anti-PV drugs. PV mutants resistant to anti-PV inhibitors or anti-PV antibodies could emerge rapidly, because a mutant exists in a population of virus (103 to 105), if a single mutation was sufficient for resistance (Blondel et al., 1986Down; Crotty et al., 2001; de la Torre et al., 1992Down; Diamond et al., 1985Down; Pincus et al., 1986Down, 1987Down). Actually, PV isolates from an immunodeficient case chronically infected with PV showed resistance to pleconaril, which is an anti-PV drug that targets the viral capsid proteins to prevent uncoating (Abdel-Rahman & Kearns, 1998Down), despite the absence of pleconaril treatment (MacLennan et al., 2004Down). In contrast, emergence of virus mutant resistant to inhibitors against cellular factors was limited, depending in part on the capacity of viral protein activities in the target step. A PV mutant resistant to brefeldin A, which blocks membrane traffic between the cis- and trans-Golgi compartments and inhibits PV replication (Irurzun et al., 1992Down; Maynell et al., 1992Down), required two mutations and was isolated after five passages under a stepwise selection pressure by raising the concentration of the inhibitor (Crotty et al., 2004Down). The emergence of a PV mutant resistant to geldanamycin treatment, which targets Hsp90 and interferes with the folding of PV capsid probably in cooperation with Hsp70 (Macejak & Sarnow, 1992Down), was not observed (Geller et al., 2007Down).

In this study, we performed drug screening by utilizing a pharmacologically active compound library with partially characterized targets and pseudoviruses, which have PV and EV71 replicons encoding firefly luciferase as a replication marker encapsidated in the PV and EV71 capsid proteins, respectively (Arita et al., 2006Down, 2008Down, Porter et al., 1998Down). We have identified four compounds and characterized their inhibitory effects on PV and EV71 infection.


   METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Cells, viruses, reagents and drug library.
HEK293 cells (human embryonic kidney cell line) (Graham et al., 1977Down), RD cells (human rhabdomyosarcoma cell line), HEp-2c (human larynx epidermoid carcinoma cell line) and L20B cells (mouse Ltkaprt fibroblast cell line expressing PV receptor) (Mendelsohn et al., 1989Down) were cultured as monolayers in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10 % fetal calf serum (FCS). HEK293 cells were used for preparation of pseudoviruses. RD cells were used for titration of pseudoviruses and for drug screening. PV and EV71 pseudoviruses, which encapsidated luciferase-encoding PV and EV71 replicons with capsid proteins derived from PV (Mahoney) and EV71 (Nagoya), respectively, were prepared as reported previously (Arita et al., 2006Down, 2008Down), except that the EcoRI site in the 5'NTR of PV replicon was removed by site-directed mutagenesis. A Sendai virus (SeV) mutant (SeV/luc), which encodes luciferase (Hasan et al., 1997Down), was a generous gift from Atsushi Kato, Department of Virology III, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan. N6-Benzyladenosine (Acros Organics), SL 327 (Sigma-Aldrich) and U0126 (Sigma-Aldrich) were dissolved in DMSO to prepare a 10 mM solution, and this was diluted with 10 % FCS/DMEM to prepare a 0.5 mM solution before use. LOPAC1280 drug library (Sigma-Aldrich) was used for drug screening. Each drug (10 mM solution in DMSO) was diluted with 10 % FCS/DMEM to 0.5 mM before use.

Virus titration.
The virus titre was determined by measuring 50 % cell culture infectious dose (CCID50) in a microtitration assay using RD cells, as described elsewhere (Nagata et al., 2002Down). Briefly, inoculated RD cells were cultured at 37 °C for 7 days, and were then observed for cytopathic effects (CPE). CCID50 was calculated using the Behrens–Kärber method (Kärber, 1931Down).

Drug screening.
RD cells (1.0x104 cells per well in 100 µl medium) were cultured at 37 °C in 96-well plates (White Opaque Tissue Culture Plate; Becton Dickinson), followed by addition of 10 µl of 0.5 mM drug solution (final concentration of 45 µM). The cells were incubated at 37 °C for 0 or 48 h. The cells were inoculated with 100 infectious units (IU) of PV or EV71 pseudovirus in 50 µl of 10 % FCS/DMEM, and then were incubated at 37 °C for 9 h (the final concentration of drugs was 31 µM). Luciferase activity of the cells was measured with Luciferase Assay System (Promega) using a TR717 Microplate luminometer (ABI) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The inhibition index, which is the ratio of luciferase activity in the drug-treated cells to that in mock-treated cells (1.0 for mock-treated cells), was determined for each drug. 50 % inhibitory concentration (IC50), at which the drugs suppressed the infection of pseudovirus by 50 % at 9 h post-inoculation (p.i.), was determined for the drugs that showed either anti-PV or anti-EV71 activity.

Evaluation of cytotoxicity of drugs.
Cytotoxicity of drugs was evaluated by two methods: observation of cell viability at 3 days after drug treatment under the same condition as for the screening (described above) and determination of the 50 % cytotoxic concentration (CC50) of drugs by the measurement of ATP as a marker of metabolically active cells. For the measurement of ATP in cells, RD cells (3.8x104 cells per well in 100 µl medium) were cultured at 37 °C in 96-well plates (Becton Dickinson), followed by addition of 10 µl of drug solution. The ranges of the concentration of drugs examined were as follows: GW5074, 0.13–0.5 mM; metrifudil, 0.0063–0.05 mM; N6-benzyladenosine, 1.3–10 mM; NF449, 0.13–1.0 mM. The cells were incubated at 37 °C for 9 h, and were then subjected to the measurement of ATP by using a CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Measurement of anti-PV and anti-EV71 activities of inhibitors.
Virus solution (containing 105 CCID50 in 5 µl 10 % FCS/DMEM) was added to RD cells (2.8x104 cells per well in 100 µl 10 % FCS/DMEM) in 96-well plates (Becton Dickinson), and then the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The cells were washed three times with 10 % FCS/DMEM, followed by the addition of 100 µl of 10 % FCS/DMEM containing each inhibitor or without the inhibitor as control. The concentrations of inhibitors examined were: 50 µM GW5074, 25 µM metrifudil, 2.5 µM N6-benzyladenosine and 50 µM NF449. The cells were then incubated at 37 °C for 7 h and collected at 9 h p.i. and stored at –70 °C. For the analysis of the effect of NF449 on virus adsorption and/or uncoating, the inhibitor was added to the cells just before adding the virus solution, and the cells were then incubated at 37 °C for 2 h, followed by three washes with 10 % FCS/DMEM and incubated in the absence of NF449 at 37 °C for 7 h (0–2 h incubation, Table 2Down). The viral RNA was extracted from the collected cells using a High Pure Viral RNA purification kit (Roche), and the number of copies of viral RNA was quantified using a real-time TaqMan PCR system (described below). The inhibition index, which is the ratio of the luciferase activity or of the number of copies of viral RNA in inhibitor-treated cells to that in mock-treated cells (1.0 for mock-treated cells), was determined for each inhibitor (Fig. 2Down and Table 2Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Effect of identified drugs on the infectivity of PV and EV71 strains

 

Figure 2
View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Idenfication of anti-PV and anti-EV71 inhibitors. (a) Structure of identified inhibitors. The inhibitory effect of each compound against pseudovirus replication is shown as the inhibition index, which was taken as 1.0 in the mock-treated cells (>0.1, no inhibition). (b) Morphology of drug-treated RD cells. RD cells were treated with 31 µM of each compound for 3 days, except NF449 (for 9 h). (c) Morphology of RD cells treated with N6-benzyladenosine. RD cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of N6-benzyladenosine for 3 days.

 
Quantification of viral RNA by real-time TaqMan PCR.
Real-time TaqMan PCR was performed as previously described by Nijhuis et al. (2002)Down. Isolated viral RNA was reverse transcribed using a Reverse Transcription System (Promega) with random hexamers according to the manufacturer's instructions. The resultant cDNA was assayed in a 20 µl reaction mixture containing 2 µl cDNA solution, 10 µl TaqMan Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) with primers (Forward primer and Reverse primer 1) and probe (Probe 1) (Nijhuis et al., 2002Down). Plasmid DNA of an EV71 infectious clone [pEV71(Nagoya)] was used as the control for quantification of the number of copies (Arita et al., 2007Down). The mixtures were subjected to real-time PCR; PCR conditions were: denaturation step at 95 °C for 20 s and 40 cycles of thermal cycling at 95 °C for 3 s and 60 °C for 30 s. The fluorescence emission of the probe was monitored and analysed by using an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems).

Isolation of PV and EV71 mutants resistant to inhibitors.
Virus solutions of PV1(Mahoney), EV71(BrCr-TR) and EV71(Nagoya) (containing 106 CCID50 in 5 µl 10 % FCS/DMEM) were added to RD cells (1.0x104 cells per well in 100 µl 10 % FCS/DMEM) in 96-well plates (Becton Dickinson) in the presence of the inhibitors. The concentrations of inhibitors examined were: 25–100 µM GW5074, 10 µM metrifudil, 0.25–5 µM N6-benzyladenosine and 25–100 µM NF449. The cells were incubated at 37 °C and collected when all the cells exhibited CPE or at day 3 p.i. Collected cell lysates for each inhibitor were mixed and then used for the next passage in the presence of each inhibitor. The passage was repeated twelve times or until a resistant phenotype was observed for the isolates compared with the parental strains in the presence of each inhibitor. The viral RNAs of the isolates were extracted from the collected cell lysates by using a High Pure Viral RNA purification kit (Roche), and the sequences of the viral genomes of the isolates were analysed in the capsid protein coding region (for mutant resistant to NF449) or in the non-structural protein coding region (for mutants resistant to metrifudil and N6-benzyladenosine) to identify the mutations required for the resistance.

Knockdown analysis by RNA interference (RNAi).
Knockdown analysis was performed by utilizing RNAi with small interfering RNA (siRNA; Elbashir et al., 2001Down). Three sets of siRNA against Raf-1, B-Raf, Pim-1, -2 and -3, HIPK2, GAK, MST2 and ATF-3 were designed in the conserved regions among the transcript variants and were prepared as 50 µM solutions of RNA duplex (Supplementary Table S1). For negative controls of each siRNA, RNA duplex with scramble sequences against each cellular-mRNA-specific RNA duplex, which did not show specificity to known cellular mRNAs but with the same nucleotide constitution as the cellular-mRNA-specific RNA duplex, was designed and prepared as 50 µM solutions of RNA duplex. RNA duplex solution (final concentration 0.1 µM) was transfected into RD cells (8.0x103 cells) in 96-well plates by using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h and the supernatant was removed and replaced with 100 µl per well of 10 % FCS/DMEM. At 72 h post-transfection, the cells were inoculated with 100 IU PV pseudovirus in 100 µl 10 % FCS/DMEM, and then were incubated at 37 °C for 8 h. Luciferase activity in the cells was measured with the Luciferase Assay System (Promega) using TR717 Microplate luminometer (ABI) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For Western blot analysis of Raf-1 and B-Raf, RNA duplex solution (final concentration 0.1 µM) was transfected into RD cells (2.0x105 cells) in 6-well plates by using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h and the supernatant was removed and replaced with 2 ml 10 % FCS/DMEM per well. The cells were further incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and were then subjected to Western blot analysis.

Western blot analysis.
siRNA-treated RD cells (3.9x105 cells) were collected in 100 µl cell lysis buffer [21 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.4), 1.8 mM disodium hydrogenphosphate, 137 mM NaCl, 4.8 mM KCl, 0.5 % Nonidet P-40 and 0.5 mM EDTA] at 72 h post-transfection, and then were subjected to 5–20 % gradient PAGE (e-PAGEL; Atto) in a Laemmli buffer system (Laemmli, 1970Down). The proteins in the gel were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride filter (Immobilon; Millipore) and blocked in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) [10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 135 mM NaCl and 2.6 mM KCl] containing 5 % non-fat dry milk. The filters were incubated with rabbit anti-Raf-1 antibody (Sigma) or with anti-B-Raf antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) (1 : 500 and 1 : 50 dilution in PBS containing 0.1 % Tween 20 and 0.5 % non-fat dry milk, respectively) at room temperature for 1 h. The filters were washed with PBS containing 0.1 % Tween 20 three times for 5 min each, and then incubated with donkey anti-rabbit IgG antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Amersham Biosciences) (1 : 1000 dilution in PBS containing 0.1 % Tween 20 and 0.5 % non-fat dry milk) at room temperature for 1 h. The filters were washed with PBS containing 0.1 % Tween 20 three times for 5 min each, and then treated with SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Pierce Biotechnology) for the detection of the signal.

Measurement of the interferon response.
RD cells (2.8x105 cells) in 6-well plates were treated with siRNA (for Raf-1 and B-Raf, collected at 72 h post-transfection), GW5074 (6.25 µM or 25 µM at 37 °C, collected after 4 h incubation) or poly IC (collected at 24 h post-transfection), and the total RNA was extracted from the treated cells with a High Pure RNA Isolation kit (Roche). The relative expression levels of OAS1 and STAT1 mRNAs in the cells were determined by real-time PCR using primers in an IFN Response Watcher kit (TaKaRa) with a One Step SYBR PrimeScript RT-PCR kit II (Perfect Real Time) kit (TaKaRa). β-actin mRNA was used as the endogenous control, and the expression levels of OAS1 and STAT1 mRNAs in treated cells were normalized by the expression levels in the mock-treated cells.


   RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Strategy of drug screening for anti-enterovirus drugs
To identify anti-PV and anti-EV71 drugs, we screened the LOPAC1280 drug library. We utilized PV and EV71 pseudoviruses that have PV and EV71 capsid protein-encapsidated luciferase-encoding PV and EV71 replicons, respectively (Fig. 1aDown). Both the short and long-term effects of the compounds were examined by preincubating RD cells with compounds for 0 and 48 h before pseudovirus infection, respectively (Fig. 1cDown). We defined anti-enterovirus activity of the compounds as suppression of luciferase activity in the treated cells by less than 10–4-fold of that observed in mock-treated cells beyond the deviation of false-positive decline in luciferase signals caused by the drug treatment. The mean relative light units in mock-treated cells inoculated with PV and EV71 pseudoviruses (obtained from 16 wells of each plate) were 1.7x107 (with a standard deviation of 1.2x106) and 4.5x106 (with a standard deviation of 7.2x105), respectively.


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Screening of anti-PV and anti-EV71 drugs. (a) Preparation of PV and EV71 pseudoviruses. (b) Replication kinetics of pseudoviruses. RD cells (1.4x104 cells) were inoculated with 100 IU PV or EV71 pseudoviruses and the cells were washed three times at 2 h p.i. Luciferase activity in the cells at the time indicated was shown. (c) Scheme of drug screening.

 
Identification of anti-PV and anti-EV71 inhibitors
In the screening, we identified a total of 101 compounds that reduced either PV or EV71 pseudovirus infectivity. We examined the cytotoxicity of these compounds and found that most of them had strong cytotoxicity at the concentration examined, leaving substantially no viable cells after the treatment (Fig. 2bUp, toxic effect in the drug-treated cells). However, treatment with three compounds (GW5074, metrifudil and NF449) had apparently no effect on the viability of the cells (Fig. 2a and bUp). Among these compounds, metrifudil and NF449 specifically inhibited EV71 infection, with inhibition indices of 3.6x10–5 and 2.6x10–4, respectively. In contrast, GW5074 inhibited both EV71 and PV infection, with inhibition indices of 2.2x10–3 and 1.8x10–4, respectively. Since metrifudil has just become commercially unavailable, we examined adenosine derivatives structurally related to metrifudil for their anti-EV71 activity, and identified N6-benzyladenosine as a strong anti-EV71 inhibitor (inhibition index of <1.4x10–5). Cells treated with GW5074 and N6-benzyladenosine showed characteristic morphological changes (flattened shape and enlargement of the cell size), in contrast to those treated with metrifudil or NF449. Treatment with N6-benzyladenosine also affected the viability of the cells at 31 µM, but not at 1.6 µM, after incubation for 3 days (Fig. 2cUp).

Characterization of identified anti-PV and anti-EV71 inhibitors
We determined the IC50 and CC50 of identified inhibitors against pseudovirus infection (Fig. 3Down and Table 1Down). The IC50 values of the inhibitors against EV71 pseudovirus infection in RD cells were of the micromolar order, except N6-benzyladenosine, whose IC50 was 0.1 µM (Fig. 3aDown). IC50 of GW5074 against PV pseudovirus infection was determined in RD cells and also in cell lines of different origins (HEp-2c and mouse L20B cells). GW5074 was effective in these cells, with an IC50 of 2.3–6.0 µM (Fig. 3bDown). CC50 of the inhibitors was determined by measuring ATP derived from viable cells. The selectivity index (SI) of each inhibitor ranged from >38 to 33 000 (Table 1Down). To examine the specificity of the inhibitory effect of GW5074, we analysed the effect on the infection of SeV, which is a negative strand RNA virus belonging to the family Paramyxoviridae (Fig. 3cDown). GW5074 had no inhibitory effect on SeV infection (at most threefold reduction of luciferase activity in the treated cells), in contrast to its strong inhibitory effect on PV pseudovirus infection.


Figure 3
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Characterization of the effect of anti-PV and anti-EV71 inhibitors. (a) Determination of IC50 of anti-EV71 inhibitors against EV71 pseudovirus infection in RD cells. (b) Determination of IC50 of GW5074 against PV pseudovirus infection in various cell lines. (c) Comparison of the inhibitory effect of GW5074 on PV and SeV infection. RD cells were inoculated with 100 IU PV pseudovirus or with luciferase-encoding SeV (SeV/luc, at a m.o.i. of 1.0 or 0.1) in the presence of GW5074 (31 µM).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Properties of identified drugs

 
Next, we analysed the effects of identified inhibitors on the infectivity of PV and EV71 strains (Table 2Up). As observed for pseudovirus infection, they had strong inhibitory effect on the infectivity of virus strains examined (inhibition indices of 10–1 to 10–5). The inhibitory effect of GW5074 was the highest against type 3 PV (Sabin) (inhibitory index of 7.0x10–5) and lowest against EV71 (BrCr-TR) (inhibitory index of 1.5x10–2). EV71 (BrCr-TR) also showed partial resistance to NF449 treatment. In this test, metrifudil, N6-benzyladenosine and NF449 did not show any inhibitory effect on type 1 PV (Sabin) infection. Except for NF449, the inhibitors were effective when added to the inoculated cells after the uncoating step (2 h p.i.). NF449 was effective only when added to the cells during virus infection (0–2 h p.i.), suggesting that NF449 inhibits the adsorption and/or uncoating step of EV71, but not the replication step.

To characterize further the target of these inhibitors, we isolated virus mutants resistant to these inhibitors (Table 1Up). EV71 mutants resistant to metrifudil, N6-benzyladenosine and NF449 treatments were isolated within five passages. Sequence analysis of the viral genomes showed mutations in protein 2C in mutants resistant to metrifudil (mutations at nt 5050 and 5815) and to N6-benzyladenosine (mutations at nt 4428 and 5048), and mutations in VP1 capsid protein were observed in a mutant resistant to NF449 (mutations at nt 2734 and 3173). The critical mutations for the resistant phenotype against each inhibitor were determined by using pseudoviruses carrying corresponding mutations (Fig. 4Down). The determinants for the resistance to metrifudil, N6-benzyladenosine and NF449 on the EV71 genome are a single mutation at nt 5050 (change of A to G) resulting in an amino acid change of glutamic acid to glycine at amino acid position 325 of protein 2C for metrifudil resistance, double mutations at nt 4428 and 5048 (changes of C to U and A to G, respectively) resulting in an amino acid changes of histidine to tyrosine and isoleucine to methionine at amino acid positions 118 and 324 of protein 2C for N6-benzyladenosine resistance, and double mutations at nt 2734 and 3173 (changes of G to C and A to G, respectively) resulting in amino acid changes of glutamic acid to glutamine and lysine to arginine at amino acid positions 98 and 244 of protein VP1 for NF449 resistance. In contrast, PV and EV71 mutants resistant to GW5074 treatment were not isolated after 12 passages in the presence of GW5074. These results suggested that the target step of GW5074 was much more conserved in PV and EV71 infection than those of metrifudil, N6-benzyladenosine and NF449, and that the inhibitory effect could not be overcome by the mutations of the viral proteins.


Figure 4
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Characterization of EV71 mutants resistant to identified anti-EV71 inhibitors. Percentage of the pseudovirus replication relative to that in mock-treated cells, which was taken as 100 %, is shown. (a, b) EV71 pseudovirus with a mutation in viral protein 2C was resistant to metrifudil treatment. RD cells were inoculated with 100 IU EV71 pseudovirus in the presence of metrifudil (16 µM) or of N6-benzyladenosine. (c) EV71 pseudovirus with mutations in viral capsid protein VP1 was resistant to NF449 treatment. RD cells were inoculated with 100 IU EV71 pseudovirus in the presence of NF449 (31 µM).

 
Inhibitory effect of GW5074 is independent of Raf-1, B-Raf and of the interferon response
To examine the possible involvement of the putative cellular targets of GW5074 in its inhibitory effect, we analysed the effect of the MEK/ERK signalling pathway, which is the downstream signalling pathway of Raf-1, on PV infection by using MEK1/2 inhibitors (SL 327 and U0126) (Fig. 5aDown). After PV infection, clear CPE in the cells treated with MEK inhibitors appeared at 8 h p.i. The cells were completely destroyed at 32 h p.i., as observed for mock-treated cells infected with PV. However, treatment with GW5074 blocked the appearance of CPE in the cells from 8 h p.i. and at least until 32 h p.i. MEK inhibitors had no inhibitory effect on the pseudovirus infection (inhibition indices of 0.30 and 0.27 at 100 µM), in contrast to GW5074 (inhibition index of 6.3x10–4 at 25 µM) (Fig. 5bDown). In addition, we did not observe an inhibitory effect from a MEK1 inhibitor, PD98059, which was included in the drug library (data not shown).


Figure 5
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. GW5074 inhibits PV replication independently of the MEK/ERK signalling pathway. (a) Effect of MEK inhibitors (SL327 and U0126) and GW5074 on PV infection. RD cells were inoculated with PV (Mahoney) (at a m.o.i. of 10) in the presence of each drug (25 µM). (b) Effect of MEK inhibitors and GW5074 on PV pseudovirus infection. RD cells were inoculated with 100 IU PV pseudovirus in the presence of each drug. The cells were collected at 8 h p.i. and the luciferase activity in the cells was measured. Bars, 100 µM.

 
Next, we analysed the effect of putative targets of GW5074 on PV infection by using siRNAs specifically targeting Raf-1, B-Raf, Pim-1, -2, -3, GAK, HIPK2, MST2 and ATF-3 (Fig. 6aDown). Partial suppression of PV pseudovirus infection was observed for cells treated with B-Raf siRNA02 and with MST2 siRNA03, but not for other sets of siRNA targeting B-Raf and MST2. We analysed the induction of OAS1 and STAT1 mRNA expression in cells treated with siRNA or with GW5074 as an indicator of the interferon response, which could serve as a non-specific cellular response against PV infection (Yoshikawa et al., 2006Down). Induction of the interferon response was observed in cells treated with B-Raf siRNA02, but not in those treated with other siRNAs or with GW5074 (Fig. 6cDown). To examine further the role of Raf-1 and B-Raf, we analysed the effect of downregulation of Raf-1 and B-Raf on the sensitivity of RD cells to the inhibitory effect of GW5074 (Fig. 6a and bDown), and found that downregulation of Raf-1 and B-Raf did not affect the sensitivity of RD cells to GW5074. These results suggested that the inhibitory effect of GW5074 on PV infection did not depend on the MEK/ERK signalling pathway, expression of Raf-1 and B-Raf, or the interferon response, and that at least individual downregulation of previously known in vitro targets of GW5074 was not sufficient to show the inhibitory effect.


Figure 6
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Effect of siRNA treatment against putative cellular targets of GW5074 on PV replication. (a) Effect of siRNA treatment against putative targets of GW5074 on PV pseudovirus infection. Left panel: RD cells were treated with siRNAs against putative targets of GW5074; the cells were then inoculated with 100 IU PV pseudovirus at 72 h post-transfection. Percentage of the pseudovirus replication relative to that in mock-treated cells at 8 h p.i., which was taken as 100 %, is shown. Right panel: Western blot analysis of Raf-1 and B-Raf in siRNA-treated cells. (b) Effect of downregulation of Raf-1 and B-Raf on the inhibitory effect of GW5074. RD cells treated with siRNAs against Raf-1 (left panel), B-Raf (right panel) and control siRNAs with scramble sequences were inoculated with 100 IU PV pseudovirus at 72 h post-transfection in the presence of GW5074. Percentage of the pseudovirus replication relative to that in mock-treated cells is shown. (c) Interferon response of siRNA- or GW5074-treated cells. The relative expression levels of OAS1 and STAT1 mRNAs in the cells were determined by real-time PCR using β-actin mRNA as the endogenous control normalized by the OAS1 and STAT1 mRNA expression in mock-treated cells. Poly IC-treated cells were taken as positive control of the interferon response.

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
By using a pharmacologically active drug library (LOPAC1280 library) with PV and EV71 pseudoviruses, we identified two compounds, metrifudil and NF449, with anti-EV71 activity and one compound, GW5074, with both anti-PV and anti-EV71 activities that suppressed the infection to less than 10–4 of that in mock-treated cells. We also found that N6-benzyladenosine, which is structurally related to metrifudil, efficiently blocked the replication of EV71. For metrifudil and N6-benzyladenosine, the spacer between the phenyl group and adenosine moiety of this compound seemed critical for the inhibitory effect, because no inhibitory effect was observed for the treatment with N6-2-phenylethyladenosine (ethyl spacer) and N6-phenyladenosine (no spacer) (data not shown). The determinants of EV71 mutants resistant to these compounds were identified in the viral protein 2C. Identified mutations were located in the C terminus portion of protein 2C (amino acid positions 325 and 324 for metrifudil and N6-benzyladenosine resistance, respectively), which is responsible for the appearance of altered membranes in the PV-infected cells by unknown mechanism (Teterina et al., 1997Down). Mutations in this region were not observed in PV mutants resistant to guanidine hydrochloride, MRL-1237 and hydantoin, which suppress PV replication by inhibiting ATPase activity and/or encapsidation activity of protein 2C (Pfister & Wimmer, 1999Down; Shimizu et al., 2000Down; Vance et al., 1997Down). Therefore, the mechanisms of inhibition by metrifudil and N6-benzyladenosine via EV71 protein 2C remain to be further studied. NF449 blocked EV71 infection at the steps of binding and/or uncoating, and the determinants of the resistance to NF449 were identified in the viral capsid protein VP1. We observed a partial resistance for BrCr-TR strain against NF449 treatment, which had a positively charged amino acid residue at position 98 in protein VP1 (lysine in BrCr-TR strain and glutamic acid in other strains examined). Amino acid changes responsible for the resistance were located at the BC loop and near the fivefold axis of the virion (Ranganathan et al., 2002Down). In PV infection, the receptor binding brings a fivefold axis close to the membrane, suggesting a direct function of this site in the uncoating process (Bubeck et al., 2005Down). Interestingly, a mutation near the fivefold axis has been identified in a mouse-adapted EV71 strain, which affected the binding to the cells (Arita et al., 2008Down). A polyanionic property of NF449 might suggest an ionic interaction of EV71 with its receptor at the site near the fivefold axis. The direct interaction of these compounds with viral or cellular proteins remains to be further tested.

In contrast to metrifudil, N6-benzyladenosine and NF449, the inhibitory effect of GW5074 did not allow the emergence of revertants under the conditions examined. GW5074 was originally identified as a Raf-1 inhibitor (Lackey et al., 2000Down), but also inhibits various kinases in vitro, including Pim isoforms (Pim-1, -2 and -3), HIPK2, RIP2, GAK and MST2, and those are considered as more potent targets of GW5074 than Raf-1 (Bain et al., 2007Down). RIP2 could be strongly inhibited by a p38 inhibitor, SB202190, which showed no inhibitory effect on PV and EV71 infections (data not shown). Infact, the in vivo effect of GW5074 is enigmatic: GW5074 has a neuroprotective action in neurones by activating, but not by inhibiting, B-Raf (Chen et al., 2008Down). This action was independent of the MEK/ERK signalling pathway, but depended on downregulation of ATF-3 mRNA (Chen et al., 2008Down). However, siRNA treatments against these putative targets did not consistently suppress PV replication (Fig. 6aUp). Interestingly, one set of siRNA against MST2 (siRNA03) showed a partial inhibitory effect without inducing an apparent interferon response. However, other sets of siRNA against MST2 failed to show the inhibitory effect, and one set (siRNA01) rather stimulated the infection (Fig. 6aUp). Therefore, the target of GW5074 for its inhibitory effect seemed different from those of in vivo neuroprotective action (B-Raf and ATF-3), but should be conserved among the enterovirus infections. It is also possible that GW5074 reacted with highly conserved region of the viral proteins for its inhibitory effect. The identity of the target of GW5074 in the inhibitory effect of PV replication remained to be further identified.

In summary, we have characterized four compounds with high anti-EV71 and/or anti-PV activity. Live and inactivated vaccines have been established for PV and used for global eradication of poliomyelitis (Sabin, 1965Down; Salk et al., 1954Down). However, there is no effective therapy for vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis, which is caused by virulent revertants of vaccine strains at a rate of one case per 520 000 doses associated with the first dose of the vaccine (Nkowane et al., 1987Down). For EV71, various vaccine candidates and therapies are being developed, but no vaccine has been established (Chen et al., 2006Down; Chiu et al., 2006Down; Liu et al., 2005Down, 2007Down; Shih et al., 2004Down; Tan & Cardosa, 2007Down; Tung et al., 2007Down; Wu et al., 2007Down; Yu et al., 2000Down). The results obtained in this study would be useful for the identification of novel targets to develop anti-enterovirus drugs that could serve as therapeutic and/or prophylactic agents against acute neurological diseases caused by enterovirus infection.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We are grateful to Junko Wada for her excellent technical assistance. We are grateful to Atsushi Kato for kindly providing luciferase-encoding SeV. This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for the Promotion of Polio Eradication and Research on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists from the Ministry of Education, Cluture, Science and Technology (KAKENHI 19790347).


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Abdel-Rahman, S. M. & Kearns, G. L. (1998). Single-dose pharmacokinetics of a pleconaril (VP63843) oral solution and effect of food. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42, 2706–2709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Arita, M., Nagata, N., Sata, T., Miyamura, T. & Shimizu, H. (2006). Quantitative analysis of poliomyelitis-like paralysis in mice induced by a poliovirus replicon. J Gen Virol 87, 3317–3327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Arita, M., Nagata, N., Iwata, N., Ami, Y., Suzaki, Y., Mizuta, K., Iwasaki, T., Sata, T., Wakita, T. & Shimizu, H. (2007). An attenuated strain of enterovirus 71 belonging to genotype A showed a broad spectrum of antigenicity with attenuated neurovirulence in cynomolgus monkeys. J Virol 81, 9386–9395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Arita, M., Ami, Y., Wakita, T. & Shimizu, H. (2008). Cooperative effect of the attenuation determinants derived from poliovirus Sabin 1 strain is essential for attenuation of enterovirus 71 in the NOD/SCID mouse infection model. J Virol 82, 1787–1797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bain, J., Plater, L., Elliott, M., Shpiro, N., Hastie, J., McLauchlan, H., Klevernic, I., Arthur, S., Alessi, D. & Cohen, P. (2007). The selectivity of protein kinase inhibitors: a further update. Biochem J 408, 297–315.[Medline]

Bedard, K. M., Daijogo, S. & Semler, B. L. (2007). A nucleo-cytoplasmic SR protein functions in viral IRES-mediated translation initiation. EMBO J 26, 459–467.[CrossRef][Medline]

Belov, G. A., Habbersett, C., Franco, D. & Ehrenfeld, E. (2007). Activation of cellular Arf GTPases by poliovirus protein 3CD correlates with virus replication. J Virol 81, 9259–9267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Blondel, B., Crainic, R., Fichot, O., Dufraisse, G., Candrea, A., Diamond, D., Girard, M. & Horaud, F. (1986). Mutations conferring resistance to neutralization with monoclonal antibodies in type 1 poliovirus can be located outside or inside the antibody-binding site. J Virol 57, 81–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bodian, D. (1949). Histopathologic basis of clinical findings in poliomyelitis. Am J Med 6, 563–578.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bubeck, D., Filman, D. J. & Hogle, J. M. (2005). Cryo-electron microscopy reconstruction of a poliovirus-receptor-membrane complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12, 615–618.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chang, L. Y., Lin, T. Y., Hsu, K. H., Huang, Y. C., Lin, K. L., Hsueh, C., Shih, S. R., Ning, H. C., Hwang, M. S. & other authors (1999). Clinical features and risk factors of pulmonary oedema after enterovirus-71-related hand, foot, and mouth disease. Lancet 354, 1682–1686.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chen, H. F., Chang, M. H., Chiang, B. L. & Jeng, S. T. (2006). Oral immunization of mice using transgenic tomato fruit expressing protein VP1 from enterovirus 71. Vaccine 24, 2944–2951.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chen, H. M., Wang, L. & D'Mello, S. R. (2008). Inhibition of ATF-3 expression by B-Raf mediates the neuroprotective action of GW5074. J Neurochem 105, 1300–1312.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chiu, C. H., Chu, C., He, C. C. & Lin, T. Y. (2006). Protection of neonatal mice from lethal enterovirus 71 infection by maternal immunization with attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium expressing VP1 of enterovirus 71. Microbes Infect 8, 1671–1678.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chumakov, M., Voroshilova, M., Shindarov, L., Lavrova, I., Gracheva, L., Koroleva, G., Vasilenko, S., Brodvarova, I., Nikolova, M. & other authors (1979). Enterovirus 71 isolated from cases of epidemic poliomyelitis-like disease in Bulgaria. Arch Virol 60, 329–340.[CrossRef][Medline]

Crotty, S., Cameron, C. E. & Andino, R. (2001). RNA virus error catastrophe: direct molecular test by using ribavirin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 6895–6900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Crotty, S., Hix, L., Sigal, L. J. & Andino, R. (2002). Poliovirus pathogenesis in a new poliovirus receptor transgenic mouse model: age-dependent paralysis and a mucosal route of infection. J Gen Virol 83, 1707–1720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Crotty, S., Saleh, M. C., Gitlin, L., Beske, O. & Andino, R. (2004). The poliovirus replication machinery can escape inhibition by an antiviral drug that targets a host cell protein. J Virol 78, 3378–3386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

de la Torre, J. C., Giachetti, C., Semler, B. L. & Holland, J. J. (1992). High frequency of single-base transitions and extreme frequency of precise multiple-base reversion mutations in poliovirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89, 2531–2535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Diamond, D. C., Jameson, B. A., Bonin, J., Kohara, M., Abe, S., Itoh, H., Komatsu, T., Arita, M., Kuge, S. & other authors (1985). Antigenic variation and resistance to neutralization in poliovirus type 1. Science 229, 1090–1093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Elbashir, S. M., Harborth, J., Lendeckel, W., Yalcin, A., Weber, K. & Tuschl, T. (2001). Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature 411, 494–498.[CrossRef][Medline]

Esfandiarei, M., Luo, H., Yanagawa, B., Suarez, A., Dabiri, D., Zhang, J. & McManus, B. M. (2004). Protein kinase B/Akt regulates coxsackievirus B3 replication through a mechanism which is not caspase dependent. J Virol 78, 4289–4298.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Geller, R., Vignuzzi, M., Andino, R. & Frydman, J. (2007). Evolutionary constraints on chaperone-mediated folding provide an antiviral approach refractory to development of drug resistance. Genes Dev 21, 195–205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gradi, A., Svitkin, Y. V., Imataka, H. & Sonenberg, N. (1998). Proteolysis of human eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4GII, but not eIF4GI, coincides with the shutoff of host protein synthesis after poliovirus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 11089–11094.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Graham, F. L., Smiley, J., Russell, W. C. & Nairn, R. (1977). Characteristics of a human cell line transformed by DNA from human adenovirus type 5. J Gen Virol 36, 59–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hasan, M. K., Kato, A., Shioda, T., Sakai, Y., Yu, D. & Nagai, Y. (1997). Creation of an infectious recombinant Sendai virus expressing the firefly luciferase gene from the 3' proximal first locus. J Gen Virol 78, 2813–2820.[Abstract]

Hellen, C. U., Witherell, G. W., Schmid, M., Shin, S. H., Pestova, T. V., Gil, A. & Wimmer, E. (1993). A cytoplasmic 57-kDa protein that is required for translation of picornavirus RNA by internal ribosomal entry is identical to the nuclear pyrimidine tract-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90, 7642–7646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ho, M., Chen, E. R., Hsu, K. H., Twu, S. J., Chen, K. T., Tsai, S. F., Wang, J. R. & Shih, S. R. (1999). An epidemic of enterovirus 71 infection in Taiwan. N Engl J Med 341, 929–935.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Huang, C. C., Liu, C. C., Chang, Y. C., Chen, C. Y., Wang, S. T. & Yeh, T. F. (1999). Neurologic complications in children with enterovirus 71 infection. N Engl J Med 341, 936–942.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hunt, S. L., Hsuan, J. J., Totty, N. & Jackson, R. J. (1999). unr, a cellular cytoplasmic RNA-binding protein with five cold-shock domains, is required for internal initiation of translation of human rhinovirus RNA. Genes Dev 13, 437–448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ida-Hosonuma, M., Iwasaki, T., Taya, C., Sato, Y., Li, J., Nagata, N., Yonekawa, H. & Koike, S. (2002). Comparison of neuropathogenicity of poliovirus in two transgenic mouse strains expressing human poliovirus receptor with different distribution patterns. J Gen Virol 83, 1095–1105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Irurzun, A., Perez, L. & Carrasco, L. (1992). Involvement of membrane traffic in the replication of poliovirus genomes: effects of brefeldin A. Virology 191, 166–175.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kärber, G. (1931). Beitrag zur kollektiven Behandlung pharmakologischer Reihenversuche. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 162, 480–483.

Koike, S., Taya, C., Aoki, J., Matsuda, Y., Ise, I., Takeda, H., Matsuzaki, T., Amanuma, H., Yonekawa, H. & Nomoto, A. (1994). Characterization of three different transgenic mouse lines that carry human poliovirus receptor gene -- influence of the transgene expression on pathogenesis. Arch Virol 139, 351–363.[CrossRef][Medline]

Komatsu, H., Shimizu, Y., Takeuchi, Y., Ishiko, H. & Takada, H. (1999). Outbreak of severe neurologic involvement associated with enterovirus 71 infection. Pediatr Neurol 20, 17–23.[CrossRef][Medline]

Krausslich, H. G., Nicklin, M. J., Toyoda, H., Etchison, D. & Wimmer, E. (1987). Poliovirus proteinase 2A induces cleavage of eucaryotic initiation factor 4F polypeptide p220. J Virol 61, 2711–2718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lackey, K., Cory, M., Davis, R., Frye, S. V., Harris, P. A., Hunter, R. N., Jung, D. K., McDonald, O. B., McNutt, R. W. & other authors (2000). The discovery of potent cRaf1 kinase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 10, 223–226.[CrossRef][Medline]

Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685.[CrossRef][Medline]

Liu, M. L., Lee, Y. P., Wang, Y. F., Lei, H. Y., Liu, C. C., Wang, S. M., Su, I. J., Wang, J. R., Yeh, T. M. & other authors (2005). Type I interferons protect mice against enterovirus 71 infection. J Gen Virol 86, 3263–3269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liu, C. C., Lian, W. C., Butler, M. & Wu, S. C. (2007). High immunogenic enterovirus 71 strain and its production using serum-free microcarrier Vero cell culture. Vaccine 25, 19–24.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lum, L. C., Wong, K. T., Lam, S. K., Chua, K. B., Goh, A. Y., Lim, W. L., Ong, B. B., Paul, G., AbuBakar, S. & Lambert, M. (1998). Fatal enterovirus 71 encephalomyelitis. J Pediatr 133, 795–798.[CrossRef][Medline]

Luo, H., Yanagawa, B., Zhang, J., Luo, Z., Zhang, M., Esfandiarei, M., Carthy, C., Wilson, J. E., Yang, D. & McManus, B. M. (2002). Coxsackievirus B3 replication is reduced by inhibition of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway. J Virol 76, 3365–3373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Macejak, D. G. & Sarnow, P. (1992). Association of heat shock protein 70 with enterovirus capsid precursor P1 in infected human cells. J Virol 66, 1520–1527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

MacLennan, C., Dunn, G., Huissoon, A. P., Kumararatne, D. S., Martin, J., O'Leary, P., Thompson, R. A., Osman, H., Wood, P. & other authors (2004). Failure to clear persistent vaccine-derived neurovirulent poliovirus infection in an immunodeficient man. Lancet 363, 1509–1513.[CrossRef][Medline]

Maynell, L. A., Kirkegaard, K. & Klymkowsky, M. W. (1992). Inhibition of poliovirus RNA synthesis by brefeldin A. J Virol 66, 1985–1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McMinn, P. C. (2002). An overview of the evolution of enterovirus 71 and its clinical and public health significance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26, 91–107.[CrossRef][Medline]

Meerovitch, K., Svitkin, Y. V., Lee, H. S., Lejbkowicz, F., Kenan, D. J., Chan, E. K., Agol, V. I., Keene, J. D. & Sonenberg, N. (1993). La autoantigen enhances and corrects aberrant translation of poliovirus RNA in reticulocyte lysate. J Virol 67, 3798–3807.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mendelsohn, C. L., Wimmer, E. & Racaniello, V. R. (1989). Cellular receptor for poliovirus: molecular cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of a new member of the immunoglobulin superfamily. Cell 56, 855–865.[CrossRef][Medline]

Minor, P. D. (1992). The molecular biology of polio vaccines. J Gen Virol 73, 3065–3077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nagata, N., Shimizu, H., Ami, Y., Tano, Y., Harashima, A., Suzaki, Y., Sato, Y., Miyamura, T., Sata, T. & Iwasaki, T. (2002). Pyramidal and extrapyramidal involvement in experimental infection of cynomolgus monkeys with enterovirus 71. J Med Virol 67, 207–216.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nijhuis, M., van Maarseveen, N., Schuurman, R., Verkuijlen, S., de Vos, M., Hendriksen, K. & van Loon, A. M. (2002). Rapid and sensitive routine detection of all members of the genus enterovirus in different clinical specimens by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 40, 3666–3670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nkowane, B. M., Wassilak, S. G., Orenstein, W. A., Bart, K. J., Schonberger, L. B., Hinman, A. R. & Kew, O. M. (1987). Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis. United States: 1973 through 1984. JAMA 257, 1335–1340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pfister, T. & Wimmer, E. (1999). Characterization of the nucleoside triphosphatase activity of poliovirus protein 2C reveals a mechanism by which guanidine inhibits poliovirus replication. J Biol Chem 274, 6992–7001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pincus, S. E., Diamond, D. C., Emini, E. A. & Wimmer, E. (1986). Guanidine-selected mutants of poliovirus: mapping of point mutations to polypeptide 2C. J Virol 57, 638–646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pincus, S. E., Rohl, H. & Wimmer, E. (1987). Guanidine-dependent mutants of poliovirus: identification of three classes with different growth requirements. Virology 157, 83–88.[CrossRef][Medline]

Porter, D. C., Ansardi, D. C., Wang, J., McPherson, S., Moldoveanu, Z. & Morrow, C. D. (1998). Demonstration of the specificity of poliovirus encapsidation using a novel replicon which encodes enzymatically active firefly luciferase. Virology 243, 1–11.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ranganathan, S., Singh, S., Poh, C. L. & Chow, V. T. (2002). The hand, foot and mouth disease virus capsid: sequence analysis and prediction of antigenic sites from homology modelling. Appl Bioinformatics 1, 43–52.[Medline]

Ren, R. & Racaniello, V. R. (1992). Human poliovirus receptor gene expression and poliovirus tissue tropism in transgenic mice. J Virol 66, 296–304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sabin, A. B. (1965). Oral poliovirus vaccine. History of its development and prospects for eradication of poliomyelitis. JAMA 194, 872–876.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Salk, J. E., Bazeley, P. L., Bennett, B. L., Krech, U., Lewis, L. J., Ward, E. N. & Youngner, J. S. (1954). Studies in human subjects on active immunization against poliomyelitis. II. A practical means for inducing and maintaining antibody formation. Am J Public Health Nations Health 44, 994–1009.[Medline]

Sanford, J. R., Gray, N. K., Beckmann, K. & Caceres, J. F. (2004). A novel role for shuttling SR proteins in mRNA translation. Genes Dev 18, 755–768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shih, S. R., Tsai, M. C., Tseng, S. N., Won, K. F., Shia, K. S., Li, W. T., Chern, J. H., Chen, G. W., Lee, C. C. & other authors (2004). Mutation in enterovirus 71 capsid protein VP1 confers resistance to the inhibitory effects of pyridyl imidazolidinone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48, 3523–3529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shimizu, H., Agoh, M., Agoh, Y., Yoshida, H., Yoshii, K., Yoneyama, T., Hagiwara, A. & Miyamura, T. (2000). Mutations in the 2C region of poliovirus responsible for altered sensitivity to benzimidazole derivatives. J Virol 74, 4146–4154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Si, X., Luo, H., Morgan, A., Zhang, J., Wong, J., Yuan, J., Esfandiarei, M., Gao, G., Cheung, C. & McManus, B. M. (2005). Stress-activated protein kinases are involved in coxsackievirus B3 viral progeny release. J Virol 79, 13875–13881.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tan, C. S. & Cardosa, M. J. (2007). High-titred neutralizing antibodies to human enterovirus 71 preferentially bind to the N-terminal portion of the capsid protein VP1. Arch Virol 152, 1069–1073.[CrossRef][Medline]

Teterina, N. L., Gorbalenya, A. E., Egger, D., Bienz, K. & Ehrenfeld, E. (1997). Poliovirus protein 2C determinants of membrane binding and rearrangements in mammalian cells. J Virol 71, 8962–8972.[Abstract]

Tung, W. S., Bakar, S. A., Sekawi, Z. & Rosli, R. (2007). DNA vaccine constructs against enterovirus 71 elicit immune response in mice. Genet Vaccines Ther 5, 6[CrossRef][Medline]

Vance, L. M., Moscufo, N., Chow, M. & Heinz, B. A. (1997). Poliovirus 2C region functions during encapsidation of viral RNA. J Virol 71, 8759–8765.[Abstract]

Walter, B. L., Nguyen, J. H., Ehrenfeld, E. & Semler, B. L. (1999). Differential utilization of poly(rC) binding protein 2 in translation directed by picornavirus IRES elements. RNA 5, 1570–1585.[Abstract]

Wang, S. M., Liu, C. C., Tseng, H. W., Wang, J. R., Huang, C. C., Chen, Y. J., Yang, Y. J., Lin, S. J. & Yeh, T. F. (1999). Clinical spectrum of enterovirus 71 infection in children in southern Taiwan, with an emphasis on neurological complications. Clin Infect Dis 29, 184–190.[Medline]

Wang, S. M., Lei, H. Y., Huang, K. J., Wu, J. M., Wang, J. R., Yu, C. K., Su, I. J. & Liu, C. C. (2003). Pathogenesis of enterovirus 71 brainstem encephalitis in pediatric patients: roles of cytokines and cellular immune activation in patients with pulmonary edema. J Infect Dis 188, 564–570.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wessels, E., Duijsings, D., Niu, T. K., Neumann, S., Oorschot, V. M., de Lange, F., Lanke, K. H., Klumperman, J., Henke, A. & other authors (2006). A viral protein that blocks Arf1-mediated COP-I assembly by inhibiting the guanine nucleotide exchange factor GBF1. Dev Cell 11, 191–201.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wu, T. C., Wang, Y. F., Lee, Y. P., Wang, J. R., Liu, C. C., Wang, S. M., Lei, H. Y., Su, I. J. & Yu, C. K. (2007). Immunity to avirulent enterovirus 71 and Coxsackie A16 virus protects against enterovirus 71 infection in mice. J Virol 81, 10310–10315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yoshikawa, T., Iwasaki, T., Ida-Hosonuma, M., Yoneyama, M., Fujita, T., Horie, H., Miyazawa, M., Abe, S., Simizu, B. & Koike, S. (2006). Role of the alpha/beta interferon response in the acquisition of susceptibility to poliovirus by kidney cells in culture. J Virol 80, 4313–4325.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yu, C. K., Chen, C. C., Chen, C. L., Wang, J. R., Liu, C. C., Yan, J. J. & Su, I. J. (2000). Neutralizing antibody provided protection against enterovirus type 71 lethal challenge in neonatal mice. J Biomed Sci 7, 523–528.[CrossRef][Medline]

Received 8 April 2008; accepted 16 May 2008.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
M. Arita, T. Wakita, and H. Shimizu
Cellular kinase inhibitors that suppress enterovirus replication have a conserved target in viral protein 3A similar to that of enviroxime
J. Gen. Virol., August 1, 2009; 90(8): 1869 - 1879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
T.-C. Chen, H.-Y. Chang, P.-F. Lin, J.-H. Chern, J. T.-A. Hsu, C.-Y. Chang, and S.-R. Shih
Novel Antiviral Agent DTriP-22 Targets RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase of Enterovirus 71
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2009; 53(7): 2740 - 2747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Table
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arita, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arita, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Arita, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS