|
|
||||||||
1 Division of Virology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK
2 Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
Correspondence
S. Efstathiou
se{at}mole.bio.cam.ac.uk
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Published online ahead of print on 16 September 2008 as DOI 10.1099/vir.0.2008/005066-0
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In order to directly address this issue we have utilized ROSA26R reporter mice (Soriano, 1999
) containing a LacZ reporter gene whose expression is only induced following Cre-mediated recombination. Thus, following Cre-recombinase expression, cells are permanently genetically marked and can be identified by virtue of stable reporter gene expression. In this study, reporter mice have been used in conjunction with HSV-1 recombinants expressing Cre recombinase under latent or lytic cycle promoter control to determine whether viral promoter activity is compatible with cell survival and the establishment of latency. This system has revealed that lytic cycle promoter activation can precede latency establishment in a subpopulation of latently infected neurones in vivo.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids.
pHD5 is a plasmid designed to allow recombination of foreign sequences into the US5 (gJ) gene of HSV-1 (Balan et al., 1994
). pGS403 (Smith & Enquist, 2000
) is a pBluescript KSII-based plasmid containing the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) major immediate-early promoter (MIEP) driving expression of Cre recombinase. pGS403n was derived from pGS403, but contains a single base pair C
G mutation at position 3597, creating an NcoI restriction site in the initiating ATG codon of the Cre gene. This mutation was created using a Stratagene QuickChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit. pHD5-CMVCre contains the Cre expressing cassette derived from pGS403 inserted into the US5 gene in pHD5. To achieve this, pGS403 was digested with SalI and SacII and the resulting 2.6 kbp fragment end-repaired and cloned into the EcoRV site of pHD5. pHD5-ICP0Cre contains the HSV-1 ICP0 promoter (–818 to position +150 with respect to the ICP0 transcription start site) driving Cre recombinase in the US5 region. This plasmid was created by substituting the β-galactosidase (β-Gal) gene from pHD5110ntβGal (Lachmann et al., 1999
) with the Cre expression cassette. The β-Gal gene was excised by digestion with BamHI and substituted with an end-repaired HindIII–XhoI fragment from pGS403 containing Cre. pSLAT1 (Lachmann & Efstathiou, 1997
) contains a 4.6 kb PstI–BamHI fragment encompassing major LATs, derived from HSV-1 SC16 BamHI B (HSV-1 118867–123460) cloned into pBluescript M132 (Stratagene). pSLAT1βgeo (Lachmann & Efstathiou, 1997
) was derived from pSLAT1, but contains the encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) internal ribosome entry site (IRES) linked to a LacZ–neoR gene fusion (βgeo) cloned into a 168 bp HpaI deletion (HSV-1 120301–120469). pSLATCre contains the Cre recombinase gene under LAT promoter control. pSLAT1βgeo was digested with BbvCI, end-repaired and redigested with NcoI to excise the βgeo gene. pGS403n was digested with XhoI, end-repaired and redigested with NcoI, to excise the Cre gene, which was then cloned into NcoI/BbvCI-digested pSLAT1βgeo. To generate pGS-gC-403, the HSV-1 gC promoter [–200 to +124 relative to the gC transcription start site (Weir & Narayanan, 1990
) HSV-1 95968–96296], was amplified by PCR from the HSV-1 strain 17 KpnI D fragment using the following primers: forward 5'-TTTGAGCTCGAATTCTTCTTCTCCGTACGCGCTG-3' and reverse 5'-TTTAAGCTTCCTCGCGAGGGATCGGCCTA-3'. These primers introduced novel SacI and EcoRI restriction sites upstream of the gC promoter and a HindIII site was inserted downstream. The PCR fragment corresponding to the gC promoter was digested with SacI/HindIII and inserted into the SacI/HindIII sites in pGS403 placing Cre under control of the gC promoter. pHD5-gCCre contains the gC promoter-driven Cre recombinase inserted into the US5 region of HSV-1. pGS-gC-403 was digested with EcoRI/KpnI and the fragment containing the gC promoter Cre cassette cloned into EcoRI/KpnI cleaved pHD5.
Construction and characterization of recombinant viruses.
HSV BE8 and HSV C3b contain an HCMV MIEP LacZ cassette inserted into the US5 locus and the 168 bp HpaI deletion in the LAT region (HSV-1 120301–120469), respectively (Balan et al., 1994
; Lachmann & Efstathiou, 1997
). HSV CMV Cre was constructed by co-transfecting pHD5-CMVCre and HSV BE8-infected cell DNA, producing a virus that contains the HCMV MIEP Cre recombinase cassette inserted at the US5 locus at the SstI restriction site at genomic coordinate 137946. HSV LAT Cre was generated by co-transfecting pSLATCre and HSV C3b-infected cell DNA, thus inserting the Cre recombinase gene together with the EMCV-IRES 1.5 kb downstream of the LAT transcription start site. This virus thereby encodes Cre under the control of the LAT promoter. To produce HSV gC Cre, pHD5gCCre and HSV BE8-infected cell DNA were transfected into cells. The recombinant virus generated encodes Cre recombinase under gC promoter control at the US5 locus. The late kinetics of gC promoter-driven Cre transcription was confirmed by real-time PCR (data not shown). HSV ICP0 Cre was constructed by co-transfection of pHD5ICP0Cre and WT SC16-infected cell DNA. This recombinant virus contains the ICP0 promoter upstream of Cre recombinase inserted into the SstI site at the US5 locus. In all cases, cell monolayers were harvested 3 days post-transfection and recombinant virus progeny selected based on failure to stain positive for β-Gal (HSV CMV Cre, HSV LAT Cre and HSV gC Cre) when compared with parental viruses (BE8 and C3b). HSV ICP0 Cre was selected based on its ability to switch on β-Gal expression in SUA cells. Virus recombinants were isolated and plaque purified by limiting dilution. Viral genomic structures (Fig. 1
) were confirmed by restriction endonuclease digestion and Southern blot hybridization (data not shown). One-step growth curves were performed as described previously (Lachmann et al., 1996
).
|
ROSA26R reporter mice (Soriano, 1999
) were used for the in vivo characterization of HSV recombinants encoding Cre recombinase. Groups of adult mice (>8 weeks of age) that differed in age by less than 12 days were infected with 2x106 p.f.u. of virus by scarification of the left ear. At various times after infection mice were killed and CII, CIII and CIV cervical ganglia pooled and fixed on ice for 1 h in 4 % paraformaldehyde in PBS and stained for X-Gal as described previously (Lachmann & Efstathiou, 1997
) or embedded in paraffin for in situ hybridization analyses by using major LAT-specific digoxigenin-labelled probes (Arthur et al., 1993
; Lachmann & Efstathiou, 1997
).
DNA extraction for quantitative real-time PCR.
Pooled CII, CIII and CIV sensory ganglia from five mice were homogenized and incubated in 0.5 % SDS, 50 µg proteinase K ml–1 in TE overnight at 37 °C. DNA samples were subjected to phenol/chloroform extraction followed by column purification using Qiagen PCR purification kit. Real-time PCR was performed as described previously (Coleman et al., 2008
) using adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT) and ICP0 promoter-specific primer sets. APRT forward primer (nt 585–604), reverse primer (nt 706–688) (Dush et al., 1985
) and Taqman probe (nt 667–640). ICP0 primers as described in Coleman et al. (2008)
.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical differences between the numbers of marked cells per sensory ganglia from mice sampled at different time points were determined by the Mann–Whitney test.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Reporter mice facilitate the marking of a large reservoir of latently infected neurones following infection with HSV LAT Cre
ROSA26R mice were infected with a recombinant virus expressing Cre recombinase under LAT promoter control. In this construct an IRES-linked Cre gene was inserted 1.5 kb downstream of the LAT transcription start site. Insertion of reporter genes at this locus has been shown previously to result in long-term neuronal transgene expression in the context of both WT virus (Lachmann & Efstathiou, 1997
) and replication defective HSV-1 (Marshall et al., 2000
; Scarpini et al., 2001
). In contrast to the HCMV MIEP, which resulted in the marking of large numbers of neurones during the acute stage of infection, the HSV LAT Cre recombinant resulted in the marking of only a small number of neurones per ganglion (mean 5.6±1.9) (Fig. 5a, b
). Thus, the small number of neurones marked by the LAT promoter, most likely reflect the slow activation of this promoter during the early stages of latency establishment. By 15 days p.i., the number of marked cells had increased to a mean of 60±6.3 and thereafter stabilized with 84±8.5 and 82.4±8 marked cells per ganglion detected at 32 and 70 days p.i., respectively (Fig. 5a, b
).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Infection of reporter mice with HSV CMV Cre resulted in the efficient marking of sensory neurones that extended from the acute to latent phase of infection. The mean number of marked neurones per ganglion at the acute day 5 time point exceeded the number of cells marked at days 30 and 150 latent time points by 1.6-fold (P=0.031). The higher numbers detected during the acute stage is likely to be due to the marking of both acutely infected cells, which are destined to die as a result of productive infection, in addition to a cohort of cells that have experienced transient HCMV MIEP activation prior to the establishment of latency. This is consistent with the view that lytic and latent pathways of gene expression in neurones diverge from each other during acute ganglionic infection (Margolis et al., 1992
; Speck & Simmons, 1992
). The efficient silencing of the HCMV MIEP in the context of HSV-1 latency is well established (Arthur et al., 2001
; Balliet et al., 2007
; Scarpini et al., 2001
; Smith et al., 2000
) thus, the observation that there is no significant change in the average number of marked cells from days 30 (mean 87.3±9) to 150 p.i. (mean 83.9±10.2) (P=0.98) suggests that HCMV MIEP Cre expression marks a stable population of neurones that survived the initial infection. At present, we have no direct evidence that this population of marked cells represents the total reservoir of neurones containing latent HSV DNA. Nonetheless, our observations that the number of β-Gal-positive cells exceeds by ninefold the number of LAT-positive cells detected by in situ hybridization, together with previous reports demonstrating that only approximately 1/3 of all neurones containing HSV DNA express detectable levels of LATs (Maggioncalda et al., 1996
; Mehta et al., 1995
) suggests that HCMV MIEP-driven Cre expression is likely to have marked the majority of latently infected cells. Of significance, recent data using reporter mice in studies of HSV latency have revealed that the average viral copy number per cell marked with a WT HSV-1 CMV IE Cre construct is 38 genomes per cell (Wakim et al., 2008
), which is similar to estimates from single-cell analyses (Sawtell et al., 1998
; Chen et al., 2002
). These data provide additional evidence of the high efficiency of cell marking achievable with Cre expressing viral constructs in reporter mice.
Expression of Cre recombinase from the LAT promoter resulted in a distinct kinetic of cell marking in comparison to that observed using the HCMV MIEP construct. Thus, only small numbers of neurones were marked at the acute stage of infection and there was a significant increase in the number of marked cells from the acute (day 5) to the latent time points (day 30, P=0.000013; day 70 P=0.000037) with stable numbers of β-Gal-positive cells being observed from days 30 (mean 84±8.5) to 70 p.i. (mean 82.4±8). The number of cells marked by HSV LAT Cre and HSV CMV Cre are similar during latency, suggesting that the majority of infected neurones experience LAT promoter activation during the first 30 days after infection. In contrast, expression of LacZ under LAT promoter control in a virus context has previously shown to mark relatively small numbers of latently infected neurones (Lachmann & Efstathiou, 1997
). Thus, methodologies relying on direct assays of promoter activity at specific time points rather than historical measures, are likely to have underestimated the total proportion of cells that can experience promoter activity over a prolonged time frame.
Of particular interest was the observation that HSV ICP0 Cre was able to mark a stable population of neurones during latency. For the following reasons we consider it likely that these neurones represent cells that experienced activation of this IE promoter prior to the establishment of latency. (i) Previous in vivo studies examining the activity of the ICP0 promoter during latency using HSV recombinants encoding ICP0 promoter-reporter gene constructs resulted in the detection of few, if any reporter gene-positive neurones during latency (Lachmann et al., 1999
; Shimeld et al., 2001
; Thompson et al., 2003
). These data support the view that the ICP0 promoter is effectively silenced during latency. Therefore, the marking of a large reservoir of latently infected cells in this system is most likely due to transient activation of the ICP0 promoter in a specific subpopulation of cells during latency establishment rather than a result of ongoing ICP0 promoter activity during established latency. (ii) HSV ICP0 Cre marked an average of 30.1 and 28.1 LacZ-positive neurones per ganglion at days 30 and 65, respectively, which constitutes approximately 1/3 of the total latent reservoir as defined by the number of neurones marked by the HSV CMV or HSV LAT Cre recombinants. (iii) In the unlikely event that this marking is due to low-level transcription during latency it is necessary to point out that this expression starts very early in latency, all cells are marked by day 30, and it is restricted to a stable subpopulation of infected cells.
This stability of cell marking implies the existence of two populations of latently infected cells that had either experienced or not, prior ICP0-mediated reporter gene activation.
The low efficiency of cell marking by the HSV gC Cre recombinant during acute infection was unexpected since this virus has no detectable phenotype either in vitro or in vivo. Therefore, the failure to observe large numbers of β-Gal-positive cells within ganglia at day 5 is unlikely to be a consequence of virus attenuation. A more likely explanation is that virus-induced host cell shut off and cell death precluded reporter gene activation at this acute time point, resulting in an underestimate of the number of infected cells. Thus, the late kinetics of Cre recombinase expression may prove to be incompatible with efficient cell marking during lytic infection as a consequence of virus-induced cytopathic effects. This view is supported by the marked reduction in the efficiency of this recombinant to induce reporter gene expression following infection of the SUA reporter cell line (Rinaldi et al., 1999
) in comparison to the ICP0 and CMV Cre recombinants (data not shown).
Previous studies on the frequency of spontaneous in vivo reactivation have estimated that reactivation occurs in approximately 1 out of every 50–90 000 latently infected neurones or 1 reactivating neurone per 10–17 ganglia (Feldman et al., 2002
; Sawtell, 2003
). In the current study, the frequency of β-Gal-positive neurones revealed by using the HSV gC Cre virus is 1.9–2 per ganglion during latency, which is at least 10-fold higher than the expected frequency of spontaneous reactivation. One possible explanation for this high frequency of marking by the HSV gC Cre recombinant is that the small, but stable, population of β-Gal-positive neurones observed during latency constitute cells that have survived late gene expression, possibly as a result of non-cytolytic CD8 T-mediated abrogation of replication (Sheridan et al., 2007
; Simmons & Tscharke, 1992
).
Mechanistically, the most widely accepted view of latency establishment is that it is the result of a failure of IE gene activation (Efstathiou & Preston, 2005
; Garcia-Blanco & Cullen, 1991
; Knipe & Cliffe, 2008
). It is therefore of interest that the reporter mouse system identified a cohort of latently infected cells that had experienced prior ICP0 promoter activation since ICP0 is a major transcriptional activator that plays an important role in the initiation of lytic cycle replication and reactivation (reviewed by Everett, 2000
). As there is increasing evidence that HSV utilizes post-transcriptional regulatory strategies (Thompson et al., 2003
; Umbach et al., 2008
) a key issue will now be to determine whether the ICP0 promoter mediated Cre expression accurately reflects ICP0 protein expression during neuronal infection in vivo. Nonetheless, previous studies utilizing an in vitro neuronal latency model system have suggested that ICP0 gene expression can precede latency establishment raising the possibility that neurones can tolerate some degree of lytic gene expression prior to the establishment of latency (Arthur et al., 2001
). Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that the efficient establishment of HSV-1 latency is dependent on ICP0 expression (Wilcox et al., 1990
). In conjunction with the data reported in the current study it seems likely that HSV can follow at least two pathways into latency: one that is preceded by ICP0 promoter activation and another that follows a default pathway with no prior evidence of IE promoter activation. It will therefore be of considerable interest to determine whether the cell marking observed with the ICP0 promoter can be extended to other IE or E virus promoters and to determine the biological consequences of such promoter activation. Since only small numbers of latently infected cells are competent for virus reactivation, it will now be possible to determine whether populations of latently infected cells that have experienced different degrees of virus promoter activation prior to the establishment of latency represent cells with an altered propensity for reactivation. In addition, the marking of different subsets of latently infected cells using reporter mice offers a potentially powerful system for the isolation and biochemical characterization of latently infected neuronal subsets.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Arthur, J. L., Scarpini, C. G., Connor, V., Lachmann, R. H., Tolkovsky, A. M. & Efstathiou, S. (2001). Herpes simplex virus type 1 promoter activity during latency establishment, maintenance, and reactivation in primary dorsal root neurons in vitro. J Virol 75, 3885–3895.
Balan, P., Davis-Poynter, N., Bell, S., Atkinson, H., Browne, H. & Minson, T. (1994). An analysis of the in vitro and in vivo phenotypes of mutants of herpes simplex virus type 1 lacking glycoproteins gG, gE, gI or the putative gJ. J Gen Virol 75, 1245–1258.
Balliet, J. W., Kushnir, A. S. & Schaffer, P. A. (2007). Construction and characterization of a herpes simplex virus type I recombinant expressing green fluorescent protein: acute phase replication and reactivation in mice. Virology 361, 372–383.[Medline]
Chen, X. P., Mata, M., Kelley, M., Glorioso, J. C. & Fink, D. J. (2002). The relationship of herpes simplex virus latency associated transcript expression to genome copy number: a quantitative study using laser capture microdissection. J Neurovirol 8, 204–210.[CrossRef][Medline]
Coleman, H. M., Connor, V., Cheng, Z. S., Grey, F., Preston, C. M. & Efstathiou, S. (2008). Histone modifications associated with herpes simplex virus type 1 genomes during quiescence and following ICP0-mediated de-repression. J Gen Virol 89, 68–77.
Dush, M. K., Sikela, J. M., Khan, S. A., Tischfield, J. A. & Stambrook, P. J. (1985). Nucleotide sequence and organization of the mouse adenine phosphoribosyltransferase gene: presence of a coding region common to animal and bacterial phosphoribosyltransferases that has a variable intron/exon arrangement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82, 2731–2735.
Efstathiou, S. & Preston, C. M. (2005). Towards an understanding of the molecular basis of herpes simplex virus latency. Virus Res 111, 108–119.[CrossRef][Medline]
Everett, R. D. (2000). ICP0, a regulator of herpes simplex virus during lytic and latent infection. Bioessays 22, 761–770.[CrossRef][Medline]
Feldman, L. T., Ellison, A. R., Voytek, C. C., Yang, L., Krause, P. & Margolis, T. P. (2002). Spontaneous molecular reactivation of herpes simplex virus type 1 latency in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 978–983.
Garcia-Blanco, M. A. & Cullen, B. R. (1991). Molecular basis of latency in pathogenic human viruses. Science 254, 815–820.
Hill, T. J., Field, H. J. & Blyth, W. A. (1975). Acute and recurrent infection with herpes simplex virus in the mouse: a model for studying latency and recurrent disease. J Gen Virol 28, 341–353.
Knipe, D. M. & Cliffe, A. (2008). Chromatin control of herpes simplex virus lytic and latent infection. Nat Rev Microbiol 6, 211–221.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lachmann, R. H. & Efstathiou, S. (1997). Utilization of the herpes simplex virus type 1 latency-associated regulatory region to drive stable reporter gene expression in the nervous system. J Virol 71, 3197–3207.[Abstract]
Lachmann, R. H., Brown, C. & Efstathiou, S. (1996). A murine RNA polymerase I promoter inserted into the herpes simplex virus type 1 genome is functional during lytic, but not latent, infection. J Gen Virol 77, 2575–2582.
Lachmann, R. H., Sadarangani, M., Atkinson, H. R. & Efstathiou, S. (1999). An analysis of herpes simplex virus gene expression during latency establishment and reactivation. J Gen Virol 80, 1271–1282.[Abstract]
Maggioncalda, J., Mehta, A., Su, Y. H., Fraser, N. W. & Block, T. M. (1996). Correlation between herpes simplex virus type 1 rate of reactivation from latent infection and the number of infected neurons in trigeminal ganglia. Virology 225, 72–81.[CrossRef][Medline]
Margolis, T. P., Dawson, C. R. & LaVail, J. H. (1992). Herpes simplex viral infection of the mouse trigeminal ganglion. Immunohistochemical analysis of cell populations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33, 259–267.
Marshall, K. R., Lachmann, R. H., Efstathiou, S., Rinaldi, A. & Preston, C. M. (2000). Long-term transgene expression in mice infected with a herpes simplex virus type 1 mutant severely impaired for immediate-early gene expression. J Virol 74, 956–964.
Mehta, A., Maggioncalda, J., Bagasra, O., Thikkavarapu, S., Saikumari, P., Valyi-Nagy, T., Fraser, N. W. & Block, T. M. (1995). In situ DNA PCR and RNA hybridization detection of herpes simplex virus sequences in trigeminal ganglia of latently infected mice. Virology 206, 633–640.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ramakrishnan, R., Poliani, P. L., Levine, M., Glorioso, J. C. & Fink, D. J. (1996). Detection of herpes simplex virus type 1 latency-associated transcript expression in trigeminal ganglia by in situ reverse transcriptase PCR. J Virol 70, 6519–6523.[Abstract]
Rinaldi, A., Marshall, K. R. & Preston, C. M. (1999). A non-cytotoxic herpes simplex virus vector which expresses Cre recombinase directs efficient site specific recombination. Virus Res 65, 11–20.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sawtell, N. M. (1997). Comprehensive quantification of herpes simplex virus latency at the single-cell level. J Virol 71, 5423–5431.[Abstract]
Sawtell, N. M. (2003). Quantitative analysis of herpes simplex virus reactivation in vivo demonstrates that reactivation in the nervous system is not inhibited at early times postinoculation. J Virol 77, 4127–4138.
Sawtell, N. M., Poon, D. K., Tansky, C. S. & Thompson, R. L. (1998). The latent herpes simplex virus type 1 genome copy number in individual neurons is virus strain specific and correlates with reactivation. J Virol 72, 5343–5350.
Scarpini, C. G., May, J., Lachmann, R. H., Preston, C. M., Dunnett, S. B., Torres, E. M. & Efstathiou, S. (2001). Latency associated promoter transgene expression in the central nervous system after stereotaxic delivery of replication-defective HSV-1-based vectors. Gene Ther 8, 1057–1071.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sheridan, B. S., Knickelbein, J. E. & Hendricks, R. L. (2007). CD8 T cells and latent herpes simplex virus type 1: keeping the peace in sensory ganglia. Expert Opin Biol Ther 7, 1323–1331.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shimeld, C., Efstathiou, S. & Hill, T. (2001). Tracking the spread of a lacZ-tagged herpes simplex virus type 1 between the eye and the nervous system of the mouse: comparison of primary and recurrent infection. J Virol 75, 5252–5262.
Simmons, A. & Tscharke, D. C. (1992). Anti-CD8 impairs clearance of herpes simplex virus from the nervous system: implications for the fate of virally infected neurons. J Exp Med 175, 1337–1344.
Slobedman, B., Efstathiou, S. & Simmons, A. (1994). Quantitative analysis of herpes simplex virus DNA and transcriptional activity in ganglia of mice latently infected with wild-type and thymidine kinase-deficient viral strains. J Gen Virol 75, 2469–2474.
Smith, G. A. & Enquist, L. W. (2000). A self-recombining bacterial artificial chromosome and its application for analysis of herpesvirus pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97, 4873–4878.
Smith, C., Lachmann, R. H. & Efstathiou, S. (2000). Expression from the herpes simplex virus type 1 latency-associated promoter in the murine central nervous system. J Gen Virol 81, 649–662.
Soriano, P. (1999). Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet 21, 70–71.[CrossRef][Medline]
Speck, P. G. & Simmons, A. (1992). Synchronous appearance of antigen-positive and latently infected neurons in spinal ganglia of mice infected with a virulent strain of herpes simplex virus. J Gen Virol 73, 1281–1285.
Thompson, R. L. & Sawtell, N. M. (2000). Replication of herpes simplex virus type 1 within trigeminal ganglia is required for high frequency but not high viral genome copy number latency. J Virol 74, 965–974.
Thompson, R. L., Shieh, M. T. & Sawtell, N. M. (2003). Analysis of herpes simplex virus ICP0 promoter function in sensory neurons during acute infection, establishment of latency, and reactivation in vivo. J Virol 77, 12319–12330.
Umbach, J. L., Kramer, M. F., Jurak, I., Karnowski, H. H., Coen, D. M. & Cullen, B. R. (2008). MicroRNAs expressed by herpes simplex virus 1 during latent infection regulate viral mRNAs. Nature 454, 780–783.[Medline]
Wagner, E. K. & Bloom, D. C. (1997). Experimental investigation of herpes simplex virus latency. Clin Microbiol Rev 10, 419–443.[Abstract]
Wakim, L. M., Jones, C. M., Gebhardt, T., Preston, C. M. & Carbone, F. R. (2008). CD8+ T-cell attenuation of cutaneous herpes simplex virus infection reduces the average viral copy number of the ensuing latent infection. Immunol Cell Biol
Wang, K., Lau, T. Y., Morales, M., Mont, E. K. & Straus, S. E. (2005). Laser-capture microdissection: refining estimates of the quantity and distribution of latent herpes simplex virus 1 and varicella-zoster virus DNA in human trigeminal ganglia at the single-cell level. J Virol 79, 14079–14087.
Weir, J. P. & Narayanan, P. R. (1990). Expression of the herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein C gene requires sequences in the 5' noncoding region of the gene. J Virol 64, 445–449.
Wilcox, C. L., Smith, R. L., Freed, C. R. & Johnson, E. M., Jr (1990). Nerve growth factor-dependence of herpes simplex virus latency in peripheral sympathetic and sensory neurons in vitro. J Neurosci 10, 1268–1275.[Abstract]
Received 20 June 2008;
accepted 4 September 2008.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |