|
|
||||||||



1 School of Molecular and Microbial Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
2 AGEN Biomedical Limited, Acacia Ridge, Queensland, Australia
3 Australian Biosecurity CRC for Emerging Infectious Disease, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
4 Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
5 CSIRO Livestock Industries, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
Correspondence
Roy A. Hall
roy.hall{at}uq.edu.au
Philip Toye
p.toye{at}cgiar.org
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Present address: The International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. ![]()
Present address: Department of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. ![]()
Present address: Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. ![]()
||Present address: Mosquito Control Laboratory, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Queensland, Australia. ![]()
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Diagnosis of human and equine WNV infection is commonly achieved using serological assays (Castillo-Olivares & Wood, 2004
; Prince & Hogrefe, 2005
). While plaque reduction neutralization tests are still considered the gold standard for specific diagnosis, ELISA is now routinely used (Dauphin & Zientara, 2007
), as it is less laborious and more suited to high-throughput screening. The antigenic similarity of WNV with other members of the Japanese encephalitis serocomplex, such as Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV), Kunjin virus (KUNV) and Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVEV), can make definitive diagnosis difficult due to the cross-reactive nature of the immune response (Calisher et al., 1989
; Kuno, 2003
). There is a need to improve the specificity of WNV diagnostic assays, especially to differentiate infections caused by virus strains such as NY99 and weakly pathogenic strains such as KUNV.
One approach to developing a rapid, WNV-specific diagnostic assay is to identify immunogenic peptides of viral proteins that are significantly different between WNV subtypes and closely related flaviviruses. Small peptides are ideal for incorporation into rapid platforms, due to comparably easy synthetic or recombinant production and greater specificity, due to the decreased likelihood of encoding cross-reactive epitopes.
The viral envelope (E) protein is the major viral immunogen during infection and is generally the antigen of choice for serological diagnostic assays (Prince & Hogrefe, 2005
). However, some E protein epitopes induce flavivirus cross-reactive antibodies (Roehrig, 2003
; Stiasny et al., 2006
) and recent attempts to improve the specificity of E protein-based antigens have focused on using peptides or individual domains of the E protein (Beasley et al., 2004b
; Herrmann et al., 2007
; Roberson et al., 2007
). While E-subunit antigens significantly improved diagnostic specificity, allowing differentiation between infections caused by WNV and other flaviviruses, their ability to differentiate infections caused by different subtypes of WNV has not been explored.
Defined epitope-blocking ELISAs have also been used to increase the specificity of WNV serodiagnosis and have been useful for differentiating WNV infections from those caused by SLEV and MVEV (Blitvich et al., 2003
; Hall et al., 1995
). However, they are unable to differentiate infections caused by different subtypes of WNV.
Sanchez et al. (2005)
developed and characterized a WNV-specific, domain I (DI)-reactive, monoclonal antibody (mAb17D7), recognizing an epitope with desirable diagnostic characteristics. Analysis in a competitive ELISA (Sanchez et al., 2007
) showed that WNV-positive horse sera specifically blocked the binding of this antibody, indicating that it bound to, or adjacent to, an immunogenic epitope. Furthermore, the inability of mAb17D7 to cross-react with SLEV, JEV or dengue virus, indicated that the epitope was unique to WNV.
In this investigation, we describe the mapping of the epitope of mAb17D7 to a 10 aa region, encompassing the WNV NY99 E protein glycosylation site. Using sera from WNV-infected horses, we further demonstrate the diagnostic potential of a mammalian-expressed 19 aa peptide (WN19), which incorporates the mAb17D7 epitope. Additional analysis using glycosidase digestion revealed that N-linked glycosylation was important for the recognition of peptide WN19 by WNV-positive horse sera.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Virus stocks were prepared from the cell culture supernatant of virus-infected Vero or C6/36 cells.
Horse serum samples.
One set of sera (Table 2
, samples 1–5) was obtained from horses involved in WNV experimental infection studies (Richard Bowen, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, personal communication). Horses were infected using WNV NY99 and bled on the day of infection (pre) and about 21–26 days post-infection (post). A second set of WNV-positive sera (samples 7–14) was obtained from naturally infected horses in North and Central America. These horses were not known to have clinical symptoms of WNV disease, or to have been vaccinated against WNV infection (Richard Bowen; Carolina Arévalo, Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica, personal communication). Sample 6 was collected from an uninfected horse living in Central America. All of the American samples were exposed to gamma irradiation (50 kGy) upon importation into Australia. Samples 15–22 were collected from horses living in the Northern Territory of Australia, for which detailed clinical information was not available. All sera had been heated at 56 °C for 30 min. For the microsphere assay, gamma-irradiated serum from a naturally WNV-infected horse demonstrating clinical symptoms of disease (WN horse AAHL) was used (Ross Lunt, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Victoria, Australia, personal communication). Pooled serum from WNV-naïve horses was used as an additional negative control.
|
mAb17D7 epitope characterization.
The epitope conformation of mAb17D7 was confirmed by reactivity of the mAb to reduced and carboxymethylated WNV antigen, essentially as described previously (Clark et al., 2007
). The reactivity of mAb17D7 to various viruses was assessed in ELISA using fixed, virus-infected cells, as described by Clark et al. (2007)
. The virus identity was confirmed using the binding of strain-specific mAbs in ELISA (data not shown). The strains used in this study, and the sequence GenBank accession numbers of these were as follows: WNV NY99 strain (AF196835
[GenBank]
); KUNV MRM61C strain (BAA00176
[GenBank]
); KUNV Hu6774 strain (AF196493
[GenBank]
); WNV Sarafend strain (AF196533
[GenBank]
); KUNV Sarawak MP502-66 strain (AF196534
[GenBank]
); WNV Wengler strain (NC_001563
[GenBank]
); Koutango virus DakAad 5443 strain (AF196532
[GenBank]
); MVEV 1-51 strain (AF161266
[GenBank]
); and Alfuy virus MRM3929 strain (AY898809
[GenBank]
).
The reactivity of mAb17D7 to KUNV MRM16 strain E protein (AF196505
[GenBank]
) and recombinant KUNV MRM61C antigen was assessed using Western blot. Lysates of KUNV MRM16 or WNV NY99-infected C6/36 cells were prepared as described by Clark et al. (2007)
, while recombinant KUNV MRM61C and WNV NY99 E protein in cell lysates were prepared by transiently transfecting COS-7L cells with plasmids pcDNA-prME (Chang et al., 2008
) and pCBWN (Davis et al., 2001
), respectively, using the methods described below for the expression of the single-chain Fv fragment (scFv) fusion proteins.
Peptide ELISA.
Peptide sWN10 (N–C; SHGNYSTQVG, 81 % purity) (Sigma-Genosys) was dissolved in a solution of 25 % glacial acetic acid, while sWN19 (N–C; CTTVESHGNYSTQVGATQAG, 36 % purity, Sigma-Genosys) was dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF). Peptide sHIV35, which comprises 35 aa of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) glycoprotein 41, (N–C; RILAVERYLKDQQLLGIWGCSGKLICTTAVPWNAS, 95 % purity, United Biomedical) was dissolved in 5 % glacial acetic acid.
ELISAs were performed in 96-well ELISA plates (Greiner Bio One). The plates were coated with serial, twofold dilutions of the synthetic peptides in coating buffer (50 mM NaHCO3, 50 mM Na2CO3 pH 9.6) from 1 µg per well (sWN10 and sHIV35) or 2.25 µg per well (sWN19, to allow for differences in purity). After incubation for 1 h at room temperature with gentle agitation, the plate was washed three times with PBS/0.05 % Tween 20 (PBS/T). mAb17D7 ascitic fluid (1 : 500) or affinity-purified anti-HIV-1 mAb1B1/114 (AGEN Biomedical, 4 µg ml–1), diluted in PBS/T, was added (50 µl) for 1 h. Following four washes with PBS/T, the bound antibodies were detected with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulins (Dako) (1 : 1000) and incubated for a further 1 h. After a final six washes, 100 µl ABTS substrate solution [2 mM 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt, 0.003 % H2O2 (v/v), 25 mM citric acid, 25 mM tri-sodium citrate (pH 4.4)] was added per well and incubated for 30 min. The reaction was stopped with 50 µl per well 3.9 % oxalic acid and the plate was read on an automated plate-reader at 405 nm. The OD readings represent the average of readings from two wells.
Microsphere assay.
sWN10 and sWN19 were dissolved at 1 mg ml–1 in Ca2+/Mg2+-free PBS (PBSA) containing 0.1 % SDS. Each peptide (30 µg) was coupled to 1x106 carboxylated (COOH) microspheres [bead set #46 (Fisher Biotec)] and 30 µg soluble Nipah virus glycoprotein (NiV G) was coupled to microspheres [bead set #42 (Fisher Biotec)] as described previously (Bossart et al., 2007
). The microsphere assay was performed essentially as described by Bossart et al. (2007)
, using a mAb or mouse sera dilution of 1 : 25 in PBSA, or horse sera diluted 1 : 100. WNV-immune mouse serum was generated upon experimental infection with WNV NY99.
Cloning and expression of scFv fusion proteins.
scFv fusion protein plasmids were constructed by subcloning the extended scFv sequence from pGC038CL (Coia et al., 1996
) into the mammalian expression vector pcDNA 3.1+ (Invitrogen). Murine immunoglobulin heavy chain signal peptide and signal peptide intron sequences were amplified by PCR from a proprietary plasmid (AGEN Biomedical), and inserted upstream of the scFv sequence to create pCDscFv. scFv–WN19 and scFv–WN67-encoding plasmids were constructed by inserting the sequences corresponding to amino acids E147–165 and E127–193, respectively, of WNV NY99, amplified by PCR from pCBWN (Davis et al., 2001
), downstream of the scFv sequence (Fig. 1
).
|
Further studies used recombinant fusion proteins (scFv and scFv–WN19) secreted from stably transfected NS0 cells. Transfections were performed as described above and transfected cells were selected using 0.5 mg Geneticin (Gibco) ml–1. Geneticin was removed once all of the cells in a transfection control (no plasmid) were dead. Clones secreting glycophorin-reactive fusion proteins were selected using an ELISA and converted to growth in a serum-free medium (CDM4NS0) in roller bottles. Cells were removed from the harvested medium by centrifugation at 1000 r.p.m. for 5 min in a Clements Orbital 310. The clarified supernatant was passed through a 0.45 µm filter and concentrated 2.5-fold using a 10 000 molecular mass cut-off centrifugal concentrator (Sartorius).
Fusion protein Western blots.
In initial experiments to assess the binding of mAb17D7 and WNV-positive horse sera to the recombinant scFv–WN19 fusion protein, lysates of transfected COS-7L cells were mixed with 1x sample loading buffer (NuPage LDS sample buffer; Invitrogen) and 25 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. The samples were heated at 90 °C for 10 min and then gently sheared by repeated aspiration through a 29-gauge insulin needle to fragment the COS cell genomic DNA. The antigens were separated by SDS-PAGE (4–12 % gradient polyacrylamide gels; Invitrogen) and transferred to nitrocellulose (Invitrogen). The blots were blocked with 5 % skim milk in PBS for 1 h at room temperature, or at 4 °C overnight and then probed with the relevant antibody, diluted in 1 % skimmed milk for 1 h [mAb17D7 (1 : 500), mAb1B1/114 (4 µg ml–1), horse sera (1 : 100)] or 30 min [goat anti-mouse immunoglobulins (GAM; Dako) 0.01 mg ml–1]. The blots were washed with PBS/T and probed for 30 min with the relevant anti-immunoglobulin-HRP conjugate (1 : 2000). After a final wash, the blots were developed with metal-enhanced diaminobenzidine (DAB; Pierce).
Reactivity of an additional panel of WNV-positive, KUNV and/or MVEV-positive and negative control sera to scFv–WN19 was assessed using the NS0-secreted fusion proteins, except for samples 12 and 22 (diluted 1 : 25), which were assessed using the COS-7L lysates prepared during PNGase F cleavage studies. The concentrated cell culture supernatants were transferred to nitrocellulose as described for the COS lysates above. Each serum (diluted 1 : 50) was assessed for reactivity with the secreted scFv and scFv–WN19 antigens (reduced), as well as lysates of COS-7L cells transiently transfected with pcDNA3.1+ (empty vector) and pCBWN (encoding WNV NY99 prM and E antigens; Davis et al., 2001
), which were assessed in non-reduced form. However, in this instance, a 1 : 5000 dilution of HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-horse IgG (Sigma) was used. Initial quality control was performed on all antigens. To ensure similar loading concentrations of the scFv and scFv–WN19 antigens, their relative concentrations were assessed visually by Western blot using GAM, as described above. The presence of the WN19 peptide as a C-terminal fusion protein was confirmed by the binding of mAb17D7, and the presence of E antigen in the pCBWN transient COS-7L lysate was confirmed by the binding of anti-E mAbs 3.91D and 2B2 (Hall et al., 1991
; Adams et al., 1995
). Upon optimization of this Western blot, it was observed that there was competition between the scFv–WN19 fusion protein and the recombinant E protein for binding of the anti-WN19 antibodies in the horse sera, due to the assessment of the antigens on a single blot. Thus, the amount of E protein was reduced, to decrease this competition.
N-glycosidase F (PNGase F) digestion.
scFv–WN19 COS-7L cell lysates were digested with PNGase F (NEB) according to manufacturer's instructions. Alternatively, the lysate was boiled for 3 min in the presence of 3 % SDS, followed by the addition of EDTA to 24 mM, n-octylglucoside to 3 % and 12 U PNGase F (Boehringer-Mannhein) and incubated at 37 °C overnight.
Western blots were performed, as described above. Digestion by PNGase F was confirmed by increased mobility of the scFv–WN19 protein, as detected by probing with mAb17D7 and GAM.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
The N-linked glycan is important for binding of peptide WN19 by WNV-positive horse sera
When the scFv–WN19 and scFv–WN67 fusion proteins were probed with anti-mouse polyclonal antibodies or mAb17D7, a distinct doublet was detected (Fig. 4a and b
). This was most likely due to a mixture of glycosylated and non-glycosylated fusion proteins in the cell lysate. The observation that the WNV-positive horse serum recognized only the larger, and presumably glycosylated form, of these proteins (Fig. 4d
) strengthened the hypothesis that N-linked glycosylation was required for immunogenicity. To confirm this, the scFv–WN19 fusion protein was digested with PNGase F to remove the N-linked glycan. As expected, removal of the glycan was characterized by an increase in mobility of the protein and the detection of a single band consistent with the smaller doublet fragment previously observed (Fig. 5a and b
). Fig. 5(c)
shows the results obtained with WNV-infected horse serum (sample 3, post-infection), in which no detectable binding was observed with the PNGase F-treated protein. Additional results with three other WNV-positive horse sera showed that two of the sera (samples 11 and 13) recognized the glycosylated protein only and one serum (sample 12) bound to both forms (Fig. 5d
). We concluded that glycosylation of WN19 is generally required for recognition by antibody from WNV-infected horses.
|
Further testing was performed using sera from eight horses shown to be positive for natural, subclinical WNV infections by VNT (horses 7–14). Antibodies in six of these samples specifically bound the scFv–WN19 fusion protein. Reactivity of the horse sera to recombinant WNV NY99 E protein was also assessed as a control. Two WN19-positive sera (1 post and 10) did not detect E protein (possibly due to an inadequate amount of E protein on the blot), while one WN19-negative serum (sample 14) reacted strongly with E protein and in VNT. Nevertheless, the recognition of recombinant peptide WN19 by most sera collected from horses exposed to experimental or natural infection indicated the potential of this peptide for equine WNV infection diagnosis.
Peptide WN19 is also recognized by MVEV-immune horse sera
To assess the specificity of peptide WN19 and to explore the association of reactivity with this peptide and infection with a glycosylated WNV strain, we tested sera from horses with virus-neutralizing antibodies to KUNV and or MVEV (Table 2
, samples 15–22). MVEV and KUNV are endemic Australian flaviviruses which generally cause subclinical to mild disease in horses (Kay et al., 1987
; Hall et al., 2002
). The E protein is glycosylated in strains of MVEV, but not in many strains of KUNV (Wright, 1982
; Lobigs et al., 1988
; Adams et al., 1995
). Four sera (samples 15–18) that neutralized the infectivity of KUNV, but not MVEV, reacted weakly or not at all with WN19, despite clearly recognizing the WNV NY99 E protein. The weak reactivity to the scFv–WN19 fusion protein for three of these sera (samples 16–18) was attributed to cross-reactive binding to the scFv carrier protein. In contrast, all four sera containing MVEV-neutralizing antibodies (samples 19–22) specifically reacted with the scFv–WN19 fusion protein. These data suggest that recognition of the scFv–WN19 fusion peptide is generally restricted to sera from horses infected with WNV strains and closely related flaviviruses that exhibit E protein glycosylation. However, it should be noted that the four MVEV-neutralizing sera also neutralized KUNV to an equivalent or lower titre. While a similar pattern of cross-neutralization of KUNV by MVEV-immune horse sera has been reported previously (Gard et al., 1977
), we cannot be certain of the aetiological agent of these infections.
Sera from two MVEV-immune horses (20 and 22) were further assessed for reactivity to PNGase F-treated scFv–WN19 fusion protein and did not recognize the unglycosylated peptide (Fig. 5d
). These data provide further evidence that reactivity to peptide WN19 is associated with infection of horses with glycosylated flaviviruses.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In contrast to the binding pattern of mAb17D7 to the WN19 peptide described above, the inability of sera from WNV-infected mice and horses to bind the synthetic peptides suggested the requirement for an N-linked glycan for recognition of the peptide. Peptide WN19 (E147–165) was subsequently expressed recombinantly as a fusion protein in mammalian cells to ensure authentic glycosylation. The N-linked glycan was shown to be essential for the reactivity of three WNV-immune horse sera to the scFv–WN19 fusion protein. A fourth WNV-positive horse serum could recognize both glycosylated and unglycosylated forms of the fusion peptide, which suggests that glycosylation of the recombinant fusion protein may not be required for the binding of sera from all WNV-infected horses. Previous studies have shown that the analogous region of DI of the E protein in yellow fever virus was bound by murine and human mAbs, and that the glycosylation status contributed to the nature of mAb binding (Ryman et al., 1997
; Daffis et al., 2005
). Furthermore, tick-borne encephalitis virus E protein glycosylation has been shown to stabilize DI epitopes (Guirakhoo et al., 1989
).
Analysis of sera from 13 horses, experimentally or naturally infected with WNV, revealed that nine (69 %) specifically bound the scFv–WN19 fusion protein. There was no reactivity to the peptide of two sera and cross-reactivity to the extended scFv carrier protein for another two. Analysis of paired horse sera from a WNV experimental infection trial confirmed that peptide WN19-reactive antibodies are associated with WNV infection and that the recombinant fusion peptide is recognized by 21–26 days post-infection with WNV, albeit weakly in most cases.
The reactivity of MVEV-neutralizing horse sera to the scFv–WN19 fusion protein, in only its glycosylated form, highlighted the immunogenicity of the E protein N-linked glycan during flaviviral infection of horses. This is supported by data from a limited number of sera with KUNV-neutralizing antibodies, but no MVEV-neutralizing antibodies, which indicated that infection with a flavivirus that is generally considered to be unglycosylated (Wright, 1982
) did not induce a clear response to the peptide. Although a number of glycosylated KUNV strains have been reported (Adams et al., 1995
), acquisition of E protein glycosylation of WNV strains can occur during limited passage in cell culture (Scherret et al., 2001
; Beasley et al., 2004a
). Thus, further sequencing of low-passage KUNV isolates is required to confirm that a lack of glycosylation is the predominant phenotype in the field. Considering that MVEV displays a glycosylated E protein and high amino acid identity in the region E151–160 to WNV NY99, it was not surprising that sera containing MVEV-neutralizing antibodies reacted with the scFv–WN19 fusion protein. We hypothesize that it is therefore unlikely that this peptide will enable differentiation between other similarly glycosylated flaviviruses of high sequence identity in this region, such as WNV Sarafend and glycosylated KUNV strains. Furthermore, the non-specific reactivity of most of the KUNV-neutralizing sera (which contained no MVEV-neutralizing antibodies) to the extended scFv carrier protein made it difficult to make any firm conclusions as to whether this peptide confers any diagnostic advantage over other described WNV antigens.
Several groups have recently attempted to improve the specificity of WNV E antigens by focussing on subunits of the E protein. By eliminating the cross-reactive epitopes in the E protein domain II, Roberson et al. (2007)
reported a sensitive WNV diagnostic antigen that was considerably more specific than its wild-type counterpart. In a different approach, Beasley et al. (2004b)
developed a recombinant protein based on E protein domain III. However, only limited information on the specificity of this antigen was reported for sera from natural infections. In a more defined analysis of domain III antigens, a linear, 15 aa fragment of this domain has been successfully used in ELISA (Herrmann et al., 2007
) for human WNV infection diagnosis, and has also been assessed as an antigen on an amperometric immunosensor (Ionescu et al., 2007
). The comparative specificity of these E-protein-subunit antigens has not been fully investigated.
The downside of compartmentalizing any target antigen is that there is often a reduction in sensitivity. This is evidenced by our data where a number of samples with VNT titres
160 reacted only weakly with the scFv–WN19 fusion protein, or not at all. Microsphere immunoassays have superior sensitivity due to the fluorescent reporters used, the availability of more epitopes and the greater surface area (Shi & Wong, 2003
). This platform has been investigated for WNV diagnosis (Wong et al., 2003
, 2004
; Johnson et al., 2005
; Balasuriya et al., 2006
), and we believe that the scFv–WN19 fusion protein could be a valuable inclusion in a similar assay.
The results reported here highlight the importance of considering glycans when searching for potential diagnostic antigens. The glycan-dependent binding of infected sera to pathogen antigens has been reported previously. One example is the mannose-dependent binding of an HIV-specific neutralizing antibody (Sanders et al., 2002
). Furthermore, a species-specific Ehrlichia canis peptide of high diagnostic potential has been shown in its glycosylated form to be much more immunoreactive than its non-glycosylated counterpart (McBride et al., 2007
).
Our results suggest that induction of antibodies to the WN19 epitope during WNV infection of horses is generally associated with E protein glycosylation of the infecting viral strain. Our future studies will examine the specificity and sensitivity of this peptide as a diagnostic antigen by analysing a wider range of sera from animals known to be infected with glycosylated and unglycosylated WNV strains and related flaviviruses.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Balasuriya, U. B. R., Shi, P. Y., Wong, S. J., Demarest, V. L., Gardner, I. A., Hullinger, P. J., Ferraro, G. L., Boone, J. D., De Cino, C. L. & other authors (2006). Detection of antibodies to West Nile virus in equine sera using microsphere immunoassay. J Vet Diagn Invest 18, 392–395.
Beasley, D. W. C., Davis, C. T., Estrada-Franco, J., Navarro-Lopez, R., Campomanes-Cortes, A., Tesh, R. B., Weaver, S. C. & Barrett, A. D. T. (2004a). Genome sequence and attenuating mutations in West Nile virus isolate from Mexico. Emerg Infect Dis 10, 2221–2224.[Medline]
Beasley, D. W. C., Holbrook, M. R., Travassos da Rosa, A. P. A., Coffey, L., Carrara, A. S., Phillippi-Falkenstein, K., Bohm, R. P., Jr, Ratterree, M. S., Lillibridge, K. M. & other authors (2004b). Use of a recombinant envelope protein subunit antigen for specific serological diagnosis of West Nile virus infection. J Clin Microbiol 42, 2759–2765.
Blitvich, B. J., Bowen, R. A., Marlenee, N. L., Hall, R. A., Bunning, M. L. & Beaty, B. J. (2003). Epitope-blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of West Nile virus antibodies in domestic mammals. J Clin Microbiol 41, 2676–2679.
Bossart, K. N., McEachern, J. A., Hickey, A. C., Choudhry, V., Dimitrov, D. S., Eaton, B. T. & Wang, L. F. (2007). Neutralization assays for differential henipavirus serology using Bio-Plex protein array systems. J Virol Methods 142, 29–40.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bossart, K. N., Tachedjian, M., McEachern, J. A., Crameri, G., Zhu, Z., Dimitrov, D. S., Broder, C. C. & Wang, L. F. (2008). Functional studies of host-specific ephrin-B ligands as Henipavirus receptors. Virology 372, 357–371.[Medline]
Calisher, C. H., Karabatsos, N., Dalrymple, J. M., Shope, R. E., Porterfield, J. S., Westaway, E. G. & Brandt, W. E. (1989). Antigenic relationships between flaviviruses as determined by cross-neutralization tests with polyclonal antisera. J Gen Virol 70, 37–43.
Castillo-Olivares, J. & Wood, J. (2004). West Nile virus infection of horses. Vet Res 35, 467–483.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chang, D. C., Liu, W. J., Anraku, I., Clark, D. C., Pollitt, C. C., Suhrbier, A., Hall, R. A. & Khromykh, A. A. (2008). Single-round infectious particles enhance immunogenicity of a DNA vaccine against West Nile virus. Nat Biotechnol 26, 571–577.[CrossRef][Medline]
Clark, D. C., Lobigs, M., Lee, E., Howard, M. J., Clark, K., Blitvich, B. J. & Hall, R. A. (2007). In situ reactions of monoclonal antibodies with a viable mutant of Murray Valley encephalitis virus reveal an absence of dimeric NS1 protein. J Gen Virol 88, 1175–1183.
Coia, G., Hudson, P. J. & Lilley, G. G. (1996). Construction of recombinant extended single-chain antibody peptide conjugates for use in the diagnosis of HIV-1 and HIV-2. J Immunol Methods 192, 13–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
Daffis, S., Kontermann, R. E., Korimbocus, J., Zeller, H., Klenk, H. D. & ter Meulen, J. (2005). Antibody responses against wild-type yellow fever virus and the 17D vaccine strain: characterization with human monoclonal antibody fragments and neutralization escape variants. Virology 337, 262–272.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dauphin, G. & Zientara, S. (2007). West Nile virus: recent trends in diagnosis and vaccine development. Vaccine 25, 5563–5576.[CrossRef][Medline]
Davis, B. S., Chang, G. J., Cropp, B., Roehrig, J. T., Martin, D. A., Mitchell, C. J., Bowen, R. & Bunning, M. L. (2001). West Nile virus recombinant DNA vaccine protects mouse and horse from virus challenge and expresses in vitro a noninfectious recombinant antigen that can be used in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. J Virol 75, 4040–4047.
Gard, G. P., Marshall, I. D., Walker, K. H., Acland, H. M. & De Sarem, W. G. (1977). Association of Australian arboviruses with nervous disease in horses. Aust Vet J 53, 61–66.[Medline]
Gubler, D. J. (2007). The continuing spread of West Nile virus in the western hemisphere. Clin Infect Dis 45, 1039–1046.[CrossRef][Medline]
Guirakhoo, F., Heinz, F. X. & Kunz, C. (1989). Epitope model of tick-borne encephalitis virus envelope glycoprotein E: analysis of structural properties, role of carbohydrate side chain, and conformational changes occurring at acidic pH. Virology 169, 90–99.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hall, R. A., Burgess, G. W., Kay, B. H. & Clancy, P. (1991). Monoclonal antibodies to Kunjin and Kokobera viruses. Immunol Cell Biol 69, 47–49.[CrossRef]
Hall, R. A., Broom, A. K., Hartnett, A. C., Howard, M. J. & Mackenzie, J. S. (1995). Immunodominant epitopes on the NS1 protein of MVE and KUN viruses serve as targets for a blocking ELISA to detect virus-specific antibodies in sentinel animal serum. J Virol Methods 51, 201–210.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hall, R. A., Broom, A. K., Smith, D. W. & Mackenzie, J. S. (2002). The ecology and epidemiology of Kunjin virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 267, 253–269.[Medline]
Herrmann, S., Leshem, B., Lobel, L., Bin, H., Mendelson, E., Ben-Nathan, D., Dussart, P., Porgador, A., Rager-Zisman, B. & Marks, R. S. (2007). T7 phage display of Ep15 peptide for the detection of WNV IgG. J Virol Methods 141, 133–140.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ionescu, R. E., Cosnier, S., Herrmann, S. & Marks, R. S. (2007). Amperometric immunosensor for the detection of anti-West Nile virus IgG. Anal Chem 79, 8662–8668.[Medline]
Johnson, A. J., Noga, A. J., Kosoy, O., Lanciotti, R. S., Johnson, A. A. & Biggerstaff, B. J. (2005). Duplex microsphere-based immunoassay for detection of anti-West Nile virus and anti-St. Louis encephalitis virus immunoglobulin M antibodies. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12, 566–574.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kay, B. H., Pollitt, C. C., Fanning, I. D. & Hall, R. A. (1987). The experimental infection of horses with Murray Valley encephalitis and Ross River viruses. Aust Vet J 64, 52–55.[Medline]
Kuno, G. (2003). Serodiagnosis of flaviviral infections and vaccinations in humans. Adv Virus Res 61, 3–65.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lanciotti, R. S., Roehrig, J. T., Deubel, V., Smith, J., Parker, M., Steele, K., Crise, B., Volpe, K. E., Crabtree, M. B. & other authors (1999). Origin of the West Nile virus responsible for an outbreak of encephalitis in the northeastern United States. Science 286, 2333–2337.
Lobigs, M., Marshall, I. D., Weir, R. C. & Dalgarno, L. (1988). Murray Valley encephalitis virus field strains from Australia and Papua New Guinea: studies on the sequence of the major envelope protein gene and virulence for mice. Virology 165, 245–255.[CrossRef][Medline]
May, F. J., Lobigs, M., Lee, E., Gendle, D. J., Mackenzie, J. S., Broom, A. K., Conlan, J. V. & Hall, R. A. (2006). Biological, antigenic and phylogenetic characterization of the flavivirus Alfuy. J Gen Virol 87, 329–337.
McBride, J. W., Doyle, C. K., Zhang, X., Cardenas, A. M., Popov, V. L., Nethery, K. A. & Woods, M. E. (2007). Identification of a glycosylated Ehrlichia canis 19-kilodalton major immunoreactive protein with a species-specific serine-rich glycopeptide epitope. Infect Immun 75, 74–82.
Prince, H. E. & Hogrefe, W. R. (2005). Assays for detecting West Nile virus antibodies in human serum, plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Appl Immunol Rev 5, 45–63.[CrossRef]
Roberson, J. A., Crill, W. D. & Chang, G. J. (2007). Differentiation of West Nile and St. Louis encephalitis virus infections by use of noninfectious virus-like particles with reduced cross-reactivity. J Clin Microbiol 45, 3167–3174.
Roehrig, J. T. (2003). Antigenic structure of flavivirus proteins. Adv Virus Res 59, 141–175.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ryman, K. D., Ledger, T. N., Weir, R. C., Schlesinger, J. J. & Barrett, A. D. T. (1997). Yellow fever virus envelope protein has two discrete type-specific neutralizing epitopes. J Gen Virol 78, 1353–1356.[Abstract]
Sanchez, M. D., Pierson, T. C., McAllister, D., Hanna, S. L., Puffer, B. A., Valentine, L. E., Murtadha, M. M., Hoxie, J. A. & Doms, R. W. (2005). Characterization of neutralizing antibodies to West Nile virus. Virology 336, 70–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sanchez, M. D., Pierson, T. C., DeGrace, M. M., Mattei, L. M., Hanna, S. L., Del Piero, F. & Doms, R. W. (2007). The neutralizing antibody response against West Nile virus in naturally infected horses. Virology 359, 336–348.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sanders, R. W., Venturi, M., Schiffner, L., Kalyanaraman, R., Katinger, H., Lloyd, K. O., Kwong, P. D. & Moore, J. P. (2002). The mannose-dependent epitope for neutralizing antibody 2G12 on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 glycoprotein gp120. J Virol 76, 7293–7305.
Scherret, J. H., Mackenzie, J. S., Khromykh, A. A. & Hall, R. A. (2001). Biological significance of glycosylation of the envelope protein of Kunjin virus. Ann N Y Acad Sci 951, 361–363.[Medline]
Sejvar, J. J. & Marfin, A. A. (2006). Manifestations of West Nile neuroinvasive disease. Rev Med Virol 16, 209–224.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shi, P. Y. & Wong, S. J. (2003). Serologic diagnosis of West Nile virus infection. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 3, 733–741.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stiasny, K., Kiermayr, S., Holzmann, H. & Heinz, F. X. (2006). Cryptic properties of a cluster of dominant flavivirus cross-reactive antigenic sites. J Virol 80, 9557–9568.
van der Meulen, K. M., Pensaert, M. B. & Nauwynck, H. J. (2005). West Nile virus in the vertebrate world. Arch Virol 150, 637–657.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wong, S. J., Boyle, R. H., Demarest, V. L., Woodmansee, A. N., Kramer, L. D., Li, H., Drebot, M., Koski, R. A., Fikrig, E. & other authors (2003). Immunoassay targeting nonstructural protein 5 to differentiate West Nile virus infection from dengue and St. Louis encephalitis virus infections and from flavivirus vaccination. J Clin Microbiol 41, 4217–4223.
Wong, S. J., Demarest, V. L., Boyle, R. H., Wang, T., Ledizet, M., Kar, K., Kramer, L. D., Fikrig, E. & Koski, R. A. (2004). Detection of human anti-flavivirus antibodies with a West Nile virus recombinant antigen microsphere immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol 42, 65–72.
Wright, P. J. (1982). Envelope protein of the flavivirus Kunjin is apparently not glycosylated. J Gen Virol 59, 29–38.
Received 29 April 2008;
accepted 30 July 2008.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A. Hall, S. E. Tan, B. Selisko, R. Slade, J. Hobson-Peters, B. Canard, M. Hughes, J. Y. Leung, E. Balmori-Melian, S. Hall-Mendelin, et al. Monoclonal antibodies to the West Nile virus NS5 protein map to linear and conformational epitopes in the methyltransferase and polymerase domains J. Gen. Virol., December 1, 2009; 90(12): 2912 - 2922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |