|
|
||||||||
Short Communication |


Inflammatory and Infectious Disease Center, Burnham Institute for Medical Research, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
Correspondence
Alex Y. Strongin
strongin{at}burnham.org
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
The sequences of the mutant primers are available with the online version of this paper.
| MAIN TEXT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In many flavivirus species including WNV, NS2B functions as a cofactor and promotes the productive folding and the activity of NS3pro. The cofactor activity of the 48 aa central portion of NS2B is roughly equivalent to that of the entire NS2B sequence (Leung et al., 2001
). Structural studies suggest that NS2B–NS3pro exhibits two alternative, productive and unproductive, conformations. In the productive conformation, NS2B wraps around NS3pro, completing, in a precise and well-defined fashion, the structure of the active site (Aleshin et al., 2007
; Erbel et al., 2006
). In agreement, the NS2B-free NS3pro enzyme is inactive (Falgout et al., 1991
, 1993
). These unique cofactor–protease domain interactions are common for the multiple flaviviruses (Bessaud et al., 2005
; Droll et al., 2000
; Wu et al., 2003
). The requirement of these interactions for catalysis raises the possibility of designing allosteric inhibitors that interfere with the NS2B fold rather than directly targeting the catalytic triad of NS3pro. The inhibitor design, however, requires the precise knowledge of the functional determinants of the cofactor that are essential for the catalytically productive NS2B–NS3pro interactions. Extensive efforts were expended to determine the identity of the several residue positions of mutagenesis that had a deleterious effect on the proteinase activity (Chambers et al., 1993
, 2005
; Chappell et al., 2006
, 2007
; Droll et al., 2000
; Lin et al., 2007
; Nall et al., 2004
; Pastorino et al., 2006
). These earlier studies were performed when the catalytically productive structure of the two-component NS2B–NS3pro was unknown. We extended these studies by using mutagenesis to identify the additional and novel functional determinants in the NS2B sequence. In contrast with earlier work, the knowledge of the crystal structures of NS2B–NS3pro provided structural guidance for our studies.
The hydrophilic central sequence has been identified as an essential region of the of NS2B cofactor, which is required for the catalytic activity of the two-component NS2B–NS3pro (Fig. 1a
). Deletion and substitution mutagenesis have already led to a substantial, albeit incomplete, understanding of the importance of the individual residues of the cofactor (Chambers et al., 1993
, 2005
; Chappell et al., 2006
, 2007
; Droll et al., 2000
; Lin et al., 2007
; Niyomrattanakit et al., 2004
; Pastorino et al., 2006
). These data in combination with the knowledge of the crystal structure of both the WNV and the dengue 2 virus NS2B–NS3pro, which has recently become available (Aleshin et al., 2007
; Erbel et al., 2006
), suggest that the functional determinants are localized in the
-helical (
1) and the β-strand regions (β1–3) of the flaviviral NS2B sequence. Additional functionally important residues, which are localized at the C-terminal region of the cofactor, are proximal to the NS2B–NS3pro junction region.
|
To acquire experimental evidence that our in silico predictions were correct, we used site-directed mutagenesis on the cofactor sequence. The 48 aa residue central portion of NS2B (residues 1393–1440 of the WNV polyprotein precursor) and NS3pro (residues 1476–1687 of the WNV precursor) sequences were linked by a flexible GGGGSGGGG linker. This wild-type NS2B–NS3pro construct (NS2B–NS3pro-WT) was used as a template for the PCR mutagenesis to obtain the D42G mutant. The autolytic cleavage site K48G
GGGSGGGG in the NS2B–NS3pro junction region was inactivated by the K48A mutation (Shiryaev et al., 2007
). The resulting self-proteolysis-resistant NS2B–NS3pro K48A construct was used as a template for constructing the D32DD/A32AA and G22S mutants, which we have named DDD/AAA and G22S in the text below. To destroy the tight interactions involving G22, we mutated this residue to S (G22S). To eliminate the negative charge at the S2 subsite, we converted the D32DD34 sequence into AAA (DDD/AAA). The primers we used for the mutagenesis are listed in Supplementary Table S1 (available in JGV Online). The mutant PCR products were further amplified using the 5'-CACCATGTCAACAGATATGTGGATTGAGAG-3' and 5'-TCAGTGATGGTGATGGTGATGCAGCATCTCAGGTTCGAATCCGGC-3' oligonucleotides as the forward and reverse primers, respectively, to obtain the final 741 bp mutant constructs, including the His-tag sequence (the sequence that encodes a Hisx6 tag is underlined).
The NS2B–NS3pro constructs were then recloned into the pET101/D-TOPO cloning vector (Invitrogen) to encode the recombinant sequence, which was C-terminally tagged with the Hisx6 tag. The NS2B–NS3pro constructs were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) Codon Plus cells (Stratagene) and purified using Co2+-chelating Sepharose Fast Flow chromatography (Shiryaev et al., 2006
, 2007
). Collected fractions were analysed using 15 % SDS-PAGE. The presence of the NS2B–NS3pro cleavage activity in the fractions was confirmed using either butyloxycarbonyl-Arg-Val-Arg-Arg-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (Boc-RVRR-AMC) or pyroglutamic acid-Arg-Thr-Lys-Arg-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (Pyr-RTKR-AMC) as a substrate. The peak fractions were pooled, concentrated with a 30 kDa cut-off concentrator (Millipore) and dialysed against 10 mM Tris/HCl buffer, pH 8.0, containing 100 mM NaCl. Metal-chelating chromatography followed by rechromatography of the pooled fractions was sufficient to isolate the highly purified NS2B–NS3pro mutant constructs (Fig. 2a
). The presence of the intact C-terminal sequence in the NS2B–NS3pro constructs was confirmed by Western blotting using a monoclonal His-tag murine antibody, followed by the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG (Jackson Laboratories) and a TMB/M substrate (Chemicon).
|
GGGSGGGG linker region and it generated the non-covalently associated NS2B and NS3pro in a manner that was similar to the NS2B–NS3pro-WT construct (Shiryaev et al., 2006
The trans-proteolytic activity of the constructs was measured using the Boc-RVRR-AMC and Pyr-RTKR-AMC peptides (both from American Peptide Company) and the myelin basic protein (MBP; Biodesign) as substrates. MBP, a protein that is highly sensitive to NS3pro proteolysis (Shiryaev et al., 2006
), was used as a substrate to demonstrate that the activity loss of the mutant NS2B–NS3pro construct also includes the endoproteolytic activity. The assay for NS2B–NS3pro peptide cleavage activity was performed in 0.1 ml 10 mM Tris/HCl buffer, pH 8.0, containing 20 % glycerol (v/v) and 0.005 % Brij 35. The cleavage peptide (either Boc-RVRR-AMC or Pyr-RTKR-AMC) and enzyme concentrations, unless indicated otherwise, were 24 µM and 10 nM, respectively. Initial reaction velocities were monitored continuously at
ex=360 nm and
em=460 nm on a Spectramax Gemini electron microscopy fluorescence spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices). All assays were performed in triplicate in wells of a 96-well plate. The concentration of active proteinase was measured using a fluorescence assay by titration against a standard aprotinin solution of a known concentration (Shiryaev et al., 2006
).
We determined that the specific activity of the D42G mutant was approximately 50 % when compared with the NS2B–NS3pro-WT or the original NS2B–NS3pro K48A constructs against both Pyr-RTKR-AMC and Boc-RVRR-AMC (Fig. 2b
). In turn, the G22S mutant retained a low, 3 %, residual activity, while the DDD/AAA mutant lost 99 % of its activity when compared with the WT and K48A constructs. Interestingly, the Km value of the G22S mutant decreased approximately sevenfold, while the kcat value went down
200-fold resulting in a 30-fold loss of the kcat/Km parameter when compared with the WT construct (Km=30 and 4 µM of WT and G22S, respectively; kcat=2 and 0.008 s–1 of WT and G22S, respectively). Aprotinin, a potent substrate-mimetic inhibitor of NS2B–NS3pro (Shiryaev et al., 2006
), efficiently inhibited the proteolytic activity of both the K48A and D42G constructs, thus suggesting that the D42G mutation did not affect the active site conformation of NS3pro (data not shown).
Consistent with our previous results (Shiryaev et al., 2006
), MBP was highly sensitive to NS2B–NS3pro proteolysis. MBP (4 µg; 11 µM) was co-incubated for 60 min at 37 °C with the purified NS2B–NS3pro constructs (0.7 µg or 1 µM; an enzyme : substrate ratio
1 : 10) in 20 µl 10 mM Tris/HCl buffer, pH 8.0, containing 20 % glycerol (v/v). The reactions were stopped by adding 2x SDS sample buffer [125 mM Tris/HCl, pH 6.8, containing 4 % SDS, 20 mM DTT, 0.005 % bromophenol blue and 20 % glycerol (v/v)]. The digested samples were resolved in 4–20 % gradient SDS-gel electrophoresis to determine the conversion of 18 kDa MBP into the 6 and 14 kDa digested fragments. Fig. 2(c)
shows that 18 kDa MBP was almost totally proteolysed by the NS2B–NS3pro K48A construct generating, as a result of the proteolysis, the
6 and
14 kDa fragments. In contrast, both the G22S and the DDD/AAA mutants did not cleave MBP.
Circular dichroism (CD) studies confirmed the structural integrity of the DDD/AAA mutant construct, the spectrum of which did not differ significantly from that of the NS2B–NS3pro K48A construct (Fig. 2d
). CD spectra (190–250 nm) of the NS2B–NS3pro purified samples (1.5–2 mg ml–1 in 15 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.8) were collected in a 1 mm path length quartz cuvette at ambient temperature using a 62ADC spectrometer (AVIV Instruments). The results are expressed as the [
]MRW (mean residue weight) ellipticity. On the other hand, the CD spectrum of the G22S mutant was significantly different. Consistent with a potential transition of this mutant to the unproductive fold (Fig. 1b
), the spectrum suggested the presence of additional
- and β-structural regions in the NS2B–NS3pro DDD/AAA samples. In agreement with our results, a similar G22A substitution resulted in a noticeable, albeit insignificant when compared to the G22S mutation, loss of activity of NS2B–NS3pro from tick-borne Alkhurma virus (Pastorino et al., 2006
). Our results suggest that the activity loss was incomplete because of an insufficient increase of the residue side chain size in the Alkhurma model.
In conclusion, the in-depth analysis of the cofactor–NS3pro interactions in flaviviruses guided by the crystal structure parameters led us to identify two novel NS2B functional determinants critical for NS3pro activation. We believe this knowledge will be highly valuable for the precise understanding of the NS2B–NS3pro molecular complex formation and for the optimization of the selective allosteric small-molecule inhibitors designed to target the NS2B–NS3pro interface. We suspect that these allosteric inhibitors designed to inactivate the two-component flaviviral proteinase by interfering with the NS2B–NS3pro interactions, will not cross-react with host cell serine proteinases and, accordingly, they will exhibit fewer side effects when compared with the active site-targeting antagonists of the flaviviral NS2B–NS3pro (Knox et al., 2006
; Lohr et al., 2007
; Yin et al., 2006
).
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Beasley, D. W. (2005). Recent advances in the molecular biology of West Nile virus. Curr Mol Med 5, 835–850.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bessaud, M., Grard, G., Peyrefitte, C. N., Pastorino, B., Rolland, D., Charrel, R. N., de Lamballerie, X. & Tolou, H. J. (2005). Identification and enzymatic characterization of NS2B–NS3 protease of Alkhurma virus, a class-4 flavivirus. Virus Res 107, 57–62.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cahour, A., Falgout, B. & Lai, C. J. (1992). Cleavage of the dengue virus polyprotein at the NS3/NS4A and NS4B/NS5 junctions is mediated by viral protease NS2B–NS3, whereas NS4A/NS4B may be processed by a cellular protease. J Virol 66, 1535–1542.
Chambers, T. J., Nestorowicz, A., Amberg, S. M. & Rice, C. M. (1993). Mutagenesis of the yellow fever virus NS2B protein: effects on proteolytic processing, NS2B–NS3 complex formation, and viral replication. J Virol 67, 6797–6807.
Chambers, T. J., Droll, D. A., Tang, Y., Liang, Y., Ganesh, V. K., Murthy, K. H. & Nickells, M. (2005). Yellow fever virus NS2B–NS3 protease: characterization of charged-to-alanine mutant and revertant viruses and analysis of polyprotein-cleavage activities. J Gen Virol 86, 1403–1413.
Chappell, K. J., Stoermer, M. J., Fairlie, D. P. & Young, P. R. (2006). Insights to substrate binding and processing by West Nile virus NS3 protease through combined modeling, protease mutagenesis, and kinetic studies. J Biol Chem 281, 38448–38458.
Chappell, K. J., Stoermer, M. J., Fairlie, D. P. & Young, P. R. (2007). Generation and characterization of proteolytically active and highly stable truncated and full-length recombinant West Nile virus NS3. Protein Expr Purif 53, 87–96.[CrossRef][Medline]
Droll, D. A., Krishna Murthy, H. M. & Chambers, T. J. (2000). Yellow fever virus NS2B–NS3 protease: charged-to-alanine mutagenesis and deletion analysis define regions important for protease complex formation and function. Virology 275, 335–347.[CrossRef][Medline]
Erbel, P., Schiering, N., D'Arcy, A., Renatus, M., Kroemer, M., Lim, S. P., Yin, Z., Keller, T. H., Vasudevan, S. G. & Hommel, U. (2006). Structural basis for the activation of flaviviral NS3 proteases from dengue and West Nile virus. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13, 372–373.[CrossRef][Medline]
Falgout, B., Pethel, M., Zhang, Y. M. & Lai, C. J. (1991). Both nonstructural proteins NS2B and NS3 are required for the proteolytic processing of dengue virus nonstructural proteins. J Virol 65, 2467–2475.
Falgout, B., Miller, R. H. & Lai, C. J. (1993). Deletion analysis of dengue virus type 4 nonstructural protein NS2B: identification of a domain required for NS2B–NS3 protease activity. J Virol 67, 2034–2042.
Knox, J. E., Ma, N. L., Yin, Z., Patel, S. J., Wang, W. L., Chan, W. L., Ranga Rao, K. R., Wang, G., Ngew, X. & other authors (2006). Peptide inhibitors of West Nile NS3 protease: SAR study of tetrapeptide aldehyde inhibitors. J Med Chem 49, 6585–6590.[CrossRef][Medline]
Leung, D., Schroder, K., White, H., Fang, N. X., Stoermer, M. J., Abbenante, G., Martin, J. L., Young, P. R. & Fairlie, D. P. (2001). Activity of recombinant dengue 2 virus NS3 protease in the presence of a truncated NS2B co-factor, small peptide substrates, and inhibitors. J Biol Chem 276, 45762–45771.
Lin, C., Amberg, S. M., Chambers, T. J. & Rice, C. M. (1993). Cleavage at a novel site in the NS4A region by the yellow fever virus NS2B–3 proteinase is a prerequisite for processing at the downstream 4A/4B signalase site. J Virol 67, 2327–2335.
Lin, C. W., Huang, H. D., Shiu, S. Y., Chen, W. J., Tsai, M. H., Huang, S. H., Wan, L. & Lin, Y. J. (2007). Functional determinants of NS2B for activation of Japanese encephalitis virus NS3 protease. Virus Res 127, 88–94.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lohr, K., Knox, J. E., Phong, W. Y., Ma, N. L., Yin, Z., Sampath, A., Patel, S. J., Wang, W. L., Chan, W. L. & other authors (2007). Yellow fever virus NS3 protease: peptide-inhibition studies. J Gen Virol 88, 2223–2227.
Madden, K. (2003). West Nile virus infection and its neurological manifestations. Clin Med Res 1, 145–150.
Mukhopadhyay, S., Kuhn, R. J. & Rossmann, M. G. (2005). A structural perspective of the flavivirus life cycle. Nat Rev Microbiol 3, 13–22.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nall, T. A., Chappell, K. J., Stoermer, M. J., Fang, N. X., Tyndall, J. D., Young, P. R. & Fairlie, D. P. (2004). Enzymatic characterization and homology model of a catalytically active recombinant West Nile virus NS3 protease. J Biol Chem 279, 48535–48542.
Niyomrattanakit, P., Winoyanuwattikun, P., Chanprapaph, S., Angsuthanasombat, C., Panyim, S. & Katzenmeier, G. (2004). Identification of residues in the dengue virus type 2 NS2B cofactor that are critical for NS3 protease activation. J Virol 78, 13708–13716.
Pastorino, B. A., Peyrefitte, C. N., Grandadam, M., Thill, M. C., Tolou, H. J. & Bessaud, M. (2006). Mutagenesis analysis of the NS2B determinants of the Alkhurma virus NS2B–NS3 protease activation. J Gen Virol 87, 3279–3283.
Preugschat, F. & Strauss, J. H. (1991). Processing of nonstructural proteins NS4A and NS4B of dengue 2 virus in vitro and in vivo. Virology 185, 689–697.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shiryaev, S. A., Ratnikov, B. I., Chekanov, A. V., Sikora, S., Rozanov, D. V., Godzik, A., Wang, J., Smith, J. W., Huang, Z. & other authors (2006). Cleavage targets and the D-arginine-based inhibitors of the West Nile virus NS3 processing proteinase. Biochem J 393, 503–511.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shiryaev, S. A., Aleshin, A. E., Ratnikov, B. I., Smith, J. W., Liddington, R. C. & Strongin, A. Y. (2007). Expression and purification of a two-component flaviviral proteinase resistant to autocleavage at the NS2B–NS3 junction region. Protein Expr Purif 52, 334–339.[CrossRef][Medline]
van der Meulen, K. M., Pensaert, M. B. & Nauwynck, H. J. (2005). West Nile virus in the vertebrate world. Arch Virol 150, 637–657.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wang, T., Town, T., Alexopoulou, L., Anderson, J. F., Fikrig, E. & Flavell, R. A. (2004). Toll-like receptor 3 mediates West Nile virus entry into the brain causing lethal encephalitis. Nat Med 10, 1366–1373.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wu, C. F., Wang, S. H., Sun, C. M., Hu, S. T. & Syu, W. J. (2003). Activation of dengue protease autocleavage at the NS2B–NS3 junction by recombinant NS3 and GST-NS2B fusion proteins. J Virol Methods 114, 45–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yin, Z., Patel, S. J., Wang, W. L., Chan, W. L., Ranga Rao, K. R., Wang, G., Ngew, X., Patel, V., Beer, D. & other authors (2006). Peptide inhibitors of dengue virus NS3 protease. Part 2: SAR study of tetrapeptide aldehyde inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 16, 40–43.[CrossRef][Medline]
Received 7 August 2007;
accepted 20 November 2007.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |