J Gen Virol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 89 (2008), 660-666; DOI 10.1099/vir.0.82215-0

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wernery, U.
Right arrow Articles by Nagy, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wernery, U.
Right arrow Articles by Nagy, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wernery, U.
Right arrow Articles by Nagy, P.

Abortions in dromedaries (Camelus dromedarius) caused by equine rhinitis A virus

Ulrich Wernery1, Nick J. Knowles2, Chris Hamblin2, Renate Wernery1, Sunitha Joseph1, Joerg Kinne1 and Peter Nagy1

1 Central Veterinary Research Laboratory, PO Box 597, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
2 Institute for Animal Health (IAH), Pirbright Laboratory, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK

Correspondence
Nick J. Knowles
nick.knowles{at}bbsrc.ac.uk


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
A virus was isolated from aborted dromedary (Camelus dromedarius) fetuses during an abortion storm in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Laboratory investigations showed the causative agent to be indistinguishable from equine rhinitis A virus (ERAV), a picornavirus. Two pregnant dromedaries experimentally infected with the camel virus isolate both aborted and an identical virus was reisolated from both fetuses, thus confirming the diagnosis. The extremely high prevalence of antibody (>90 %) and the high titres recorded against ERAV in the dromedary herd clearly showed that ERAV does infect dromedaries. Unlike horses, where ERAV targets the upper respiratory tract, in dromedaries the target organ appears to be the genital tract.

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the sequences determined in this paper are EF204767–EF204772.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Equine rhinitis A virus (ERAV), formerly known as equine rhinovirus 1, is one of two species in the genus Aphthovirus (family Picornaviridae), the other being foot-and-mouth disease virus (Stanway et al., 2005Down). ERAV was first identified in 1962 in the UK (Plummer, 1962Down) and subsequently found in horses in many countries around the world (Ditchfield & Macpherson, 1965Down; Hofer et al., 1973Down; Holmes et al., 1978Down; Studdert & Gleeson, 1977Down). ERAV infection of horses may result in acute febrile respiratory disease accompanied by viraemia and persistent virus shedding in urine and faeces (Plummer & Kerry, 1962Down; McCollum & Timoney, 1991Down). Little is known about the epidemiology and pathogenesis of ERAV, but it is thought to occur worldwide and has been responsible for relatively large outbreaks of acute respiratory illness in adult horse populations. Many ERAVs are not cytopathic in cell culture and may be missed in disease investigations that rely on virus isolation alone (Li et al., 1997Down). Despite being primarily an infectious agent of horses, ERAV is pathogenic for a broad range of other animal species, including man (Plummer, 1962Down, 1963Down). The genome sequences of seven ERAV isolates have been determined so far, as well as the complete P1 capsid-coding regions of eight additional virus isolates (Li et al., 1996Down; Wutz et al., 1996Down; Varrasso et al., 2001Down; A. Aminev and A. C. Palmenberg, unpublished data), allowing molecular diagnostic tests to be developed (Dynon et al., 2001Down).

This paper describes the isolation of ERAV from fetuses during an abortion outbreak in a dromedary (Camelus dromedarius) herd in Dubai and the results of a subsequent experimental infection of two pregnant dromedaries with the isolated virus.


   METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Outbreak history and sample collection.
In June 2003, 8/80 pregnant dromedaries (10 %) belonging to a herd of 258 breeding camels aborted at a gestation period of between 6 and 8 months. The dromedary herd was allowed to roam freely in the desert during the day and return to their camp in the afternoon where they received water and hay ad libitum. They had direct contact with horses housed in a retirement home situated on the outskirts of the camel camp near Al Awir (2 ° 1.814' N; 05 ° 25.010' E). No clinical signs of disease were noted in the dromedaries before abortion.

Several weeks after the onset of these abortions, the 57 resident horses from the retirement home were inspected for signs of disease. Blood samples were subsequently taken for serological assessment from the 258 camels in the study herd, 200 randomly sampled camels from other premises in Dubai and the 57 horses in the retirement home.

Isolation and titration of virus.
Tissues from four of the eight aborted fetuses, including placentas, were collected for bacteriological, mycological, virological and histopathological investigation. Tissue samples (liver, lung, spleen and placenta) taken from each fetus were homogenized and then pooled for virological assay.

One millilitre of each clarified tissue suspension, diluted 1 : 10 in minimal essential medium (MEM) without fetal calf serum (FCS), was inoculated onto separate monolayer cultures of Vero and fetal camel kidney (Caki) cells. Inoculated cultures were incubated at 37 °C and examined microscopically for 7 days. Virus was harvested from the infected cell cultures when they showed 100 % cytopathic effect (CPE). Samples that did not show any visible CPE were blind-passaged on two further occasions.

Serum neutralization test.
Sera decanted from the clotted blood were tested for antibodies against ERAV in 96-well microtitre plates using a serum neutralization test (SNT). Briefly, a triplicate twofold dilution series of each serum, diluted from 1 : 2 to 1 : 128 in MEM medium without FCS, was prepared on the plates. An equal volume of the reference ERAV strain NM-11/67, containing 100 TCID50, was added to each of the serum wells. A virus control titration was included in each test to confirm the virus dose used. Serum/virus mixtures were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Vero cells at a concentration of 2.0x106 cells ml–1 were added to all of the wells. Plates were sealed and incubated for 3 days at 37 °C and read microscopically on days 2 and 3. Titres were calculated as the reciprocal of the last dilution of serum in the serum/virus mixtures showing CPE at the 50 % end point (Finney, 1964Down). The sera were also tested against the virus isolated from one of the aborted fetuses as described above.

Experimental infection.
Two 7-months-pregnant dromedaries were housed at the Central Veterinary Research Laboratory (CVRL), Dubai, in separate roofed pens. Tarpaulin sheets were secured on three sides of the pens. The dromedaries were restrained in a sitting position. One was sprayed in both nostrils with 3 ml infectious tissue culture supernatant fluid containing the camel virus isolate (designated D1305-03; pooled homogenate of lung, liver, spleen and placenta collected from one of the aborted fetuses and passaged three times in Vero cells) at a titre of 104.0 TCID50 ml–1 using a nebulizer (Omron MicroAir U22) according to the manufacturer's recommendation. The particle size was approximately 4.9 µm and the nebulization rate was 0.25 ml min–1. The procedure lasted for 7 min in each nostril. The second animal was infected intratracheally with 5 ml of the same virus suspension. Both dromedaries were examined daily, and rectal temperature and clinical signs were recorded. Blood samples were collected before infection and at intervals thereafter for 3 weeks. Tissue samples (bone marrow, brain, intestine, liver, lung, placenta, skin, spleen, thymus, tonsil and trachea) were collected from the aborted fetuses of the intranasally and intratracheally infected dromedaries at 12 and 82 days post-inoculation (p.i.), respectively. Each tissue was homogenized separately and assayed for virus as described above.

RT-PCR.
Total RNA was extracted from 460 µl virus-infected cell culture supernatant using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's protocol and resuspended in 50 µl nuclease-free water. This RNA (5 µl) was used as template in a one-step RT-PCR (Ready-To-Go RT-PCR beads; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) following the manufacturer's instructions. Forward and reverse primer amounts were 20 and 40 pmol, respectively. Two different primer combinations were used to obtain amplicons containing either the complete ERAV VP1 gene (primers ERAV-1C616F and ERAV-2A22R; amplicon of 851 bp) or a partial VP1 product (primers ERAV-1D7F and ERAV-2A22R; amplicon of 782 bp) (Table 1Down). The mixes were subjected to the following thermal profile: one cycle of 30 min at 42 °C and 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 45 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 45 °C and 1.5 min at 72 °C, with a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C, and then held at 4 °C. PCR amplicons were analysed on a 1.5 % agarose/TBE gel containing 0.5 µg ethidium bromide ml–1. DNA molecular mass markers (GeneRuler 100 bp DNA Ladder Plus, Ready-To-Use; MBI Fermentas) were run alongside the samples to facilitate product identification and quantification. Post-PCR removal of dNTPs and primers was achieved enzymically using ExoSAP-IT (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer's instructions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used for RT-PCR and DNA sequencing

 
Viruses and cells.
Reference ERAV strains used at the CVRL (Dubai) and IAH (Pirbright, UK) were SWI/V1722/70 (Hofer et al., 1973Down) and NM-11/67 (RK-13 passage 9, LLC-MK2 passage 3) (Burrows, 1968Down), respectively. The viruses were propagated on African green monkey kidney cells (either Vero or LLC-MK2). Both Vero and Caki cells were used for isolation of viruses from dromedaries.

DNA sequencing.
PCR amplicons were sequenced with the four primers used for PCR shown in Table 1Up using a DTS Quick Start kit (Beckman Coulter) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The sequencing reactions were run on a CEQ800 Automated Sequencer (Beckman Coulter) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The complete VP1 nucleotide sequences of the two reference ERAV strains NM-11/67 and SWI/V1722/70 were also determined.

Phylogenetic analysis.
Sequences were compiled and edited using the EpiSeq 2.0 package (N. J. Knowles, unpublished data). Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using MEGA version 3.1 (Kumar et al., 2004Down). A neighbour-joining tree was constructed using a difference matrix based on the Kimura two-parameter model of nucleotide substitution. Confidence levels on branches were estimated by bootstrap resampling (1000 pseudoreplicates). The following publicly available ERAV VP1 sequences were also used in the analysis: PERV/UK/62 (AF347671 [GenBank] ; X96870 [GenBank] ; DQ272578 [GenBank] ), AUS/393/76 (AF347668 [GenBank] ), AUS/967/90 (AF347669 [GenBank] ), SWI/V1722/70 (AF347675 [GenBank] ), SWI/P200/75 (AF347676 [GenBank] ), SWI/P346/75 (AF347677 [GenBank] ), SWI/P1316/92 (AF347678 [GenBank] ), USA/360007 (AF347672 [GenBank] ), USA/4066/79 (AF347674 [GenBank] ), USA/544/82 (AF347673 [GenBank] ), T3 (USA) (DQ268580 [GenBank] ), Plowright (USA) (DQ272127 [GenBank] ), U188 (USA) (DQ272128 [GenBank] ) and T10 (USA) (DQ272577 [GenBank] ).


   RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Description of the field outbreak and experimental infection of pregnant dromedaries
No signs of disease were observed or reported in the eight dams that aborted or in any of the other 250 members of the cohort during the field outbreak, nor were there any signs of respiratory disease observed in the 57 horses stabled at the retirement home.

The dromedaries experimentally infected with the camel isolate via the intranasal and the intratracheal routes both developed mild, transient pyrexia on day 6 (Table 2Down). Between days 9 and 12, both experimental animals recorded a slight drop in temperature to below 37 °C. Other clinical signs observed in the intranasally infected dromedary, from day 6 until the day of abortion, included lethargy, inappetence and an oedematous udder. A clear vaginal discharge was also observed on day 11, 24 h before abortion. The second camel aborted spontaneously 82 days after the intratracheal infection but in the absence of any obvious clinical signs.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Antibody and temperature responses following the experimental infection of two dromedaries with the camel strain of ERAV

 
Gross pathological lesions recorded for the four aborted fetuses (6–8 months gestation) retrieved from the field cases and the two aborted fetuses from the experimentally infected dromedaries were similar and revealed oedema in the placenta and umbilical cord (Fig. 1aDown). The chorial epithelium observed in field and experimental cases had a greyish floury appearance with some petechial and ecchymotic haemorrhages. Severe subcutaneous, generalized oedema was seen in all aborted fetuses, most prominently in the dorsal regions from the head to the hump area, and less so in the legs (Fig. 1bDown). In all cases, the abdominal and thoracic cavities were completely filled with dark haemolytic fluid but without coagulation (Fig. 1cDown). Similar fluids were also noted in the stomach of all fetuses. No other lesions were observed.


Figure 1
View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Gross pathology observed in aborted camel fetuses from the field outbreak. (a) Placenta, showing massive oedema and petechial to ecchymotic haemorrhages. (b) Dromedary fetus showing severe subcutaneous oedema, particularly in the dorsal regions. (c) Abdominal and thoracic cavities of a dromedary fetus filled with unclotted haemolysed blood.

 
Histology revealed severe placental oedema with a thin layer of basophilic subepithelial material (mineralization of the trophoblastic basal membrane) (Fig. 2aDown). The heart showed severe interstitial oedema, which had caused degeneration of single fibres. Numerous eosinophilic round globules of different sizes were seen between the fibres and attached to the endocardium, the larger ones containing round crystalline structures (Fig. 2bDown). Similar eosinophilic round structures, which stained positively with Perl's stain (for haemosiderin pigment), were also found throughout the extensive subcutaneous oedema. Grocott, periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) and Guinea stains revealed no evidence of fungal spores in these red globules. These structures were similar to the ‘myospherules’ described by Rosai (1978)Down in cystic lesions of skeletal muscles, which have been classified as ‘altered erythrocytes’. These formations are simply erythrocytes that have been altered and clumped by haemostatic conditions. Marked intramural oedema with numerous small haemorrhages was seen in the trachea. The lung was still in the tubular development stage and showed moderate interstitial oedema. No inflammation and no inclusion bodies were seen in any organ.


Figure 2
View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Histological stained sections prepared from fetal tissues collected from field cases. (a) Placenta showing a thin layer of basophilic subepithelial material (mineralization of the trophoblastic basal membrane) (PAS staining). (b) Heart with severe interstitial oedema, degeneration of single fibres and numerous eosinophilic round structures of different sizes in the interstitium. (c) Pancreas with marked interlobular oedema. (d) Pancreas with degenerated area containing mononuclear cells and haemoglobin bodies. Bars, 30 µm (a, b, d); 60 µm (c).

 
Pathohistological investigation of the pancreas revealed marked interstitial interlobular oedema, causing disorganization of the lobules. A few small mononuclear infiltrates and haemoglobin bodies were visible but no inclusion bodies and no Langerhans islets were seen (Fig. 2c and dUp).

Isolation and identification of the virus
A cytopathic virus was isolated from the pooled, homogenized organs of two of the four aborted fetuses. No other cytopathic viruses were found. The virus isolate, designated D1305-03 (isolated from one of the fetal organ pools), was identified as ERAV using a pan-picornavirus RT-PCR (primer set ICYGDD/3'-RACE-A; N. J. Knowles, unpublished data) followed by DNA sequencing with the forward primer, ICYGDD (Table 1Up). The sequence of 441 nt at the 3' end of the D1305-03 genome was determined and included 328 nt of the 3D polymerase gene and the complete 3' UTR (113 nt including the stop codon). Additionally, the sequence of the 3' 438 nt was determined for ERAV PERV/UK/62 and this was identical to the published sequence (Fig. 3Down; Wutz et al., 1996Down). This diagnosis was confirmed using an ERAV-specific RT-PCR and sequencing of the VP1 gene. The length of the VP1 gene was 738 nt, as it was in all of the horse ERAV isolates. The relationship of D1305-03 to ERAVs isolated from horses is shown in Fig. 4Down.


Figure 3
View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Comparison of the sequence at the 3' end of the genome of camel and horse ERAVs.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Unrooted neighbour-joining tree showing the relationship of the camel ERAV, D1305-03, to isolates from horses. Confidence levels on branches were estimated using bootstrap resampling (1000 pseudoreplicates) and are shown as percentages. Sequence names shown in bold are those determined in this study.

 
Infectious virus was also isolated from several organs taken from the fetus of the intranasally infected dromedary that aborted 12 days p.i. (Table 3Down). This virus was later confirmed by RT-PCR and sequencing to be identical to the original camel virus strain (D1305-03; data not shown). Although the second dromedary, which was infected intratracheally, did not abort until 82 days p.i., both dromedaries seroconverted 7 days after experimental inoculation (Table 2Up). An identical virus was isolated from the same organs taken at 82 days p.i. from the aborted fetus of the intratracheally infected dromedary (Table 3Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Virus detected in the two aborted fetuses from the intranasally and intratracheally infected camels (12 and 82 days p.i., respectively)

Identical results were obtained for each animal. –, Virus not isolated; +, virus isolated.

 
The SNT results of racing and breeding dromedaries and horses from the retiring premises are shown in Table 4Down. The results were identical for both the field and the reference ERAV strains. Most of the dromedary (>85 %) and horse (>75 %) sera recorded antibody titres greater than 1 : 128. The sera from the 200 randomly selected racing camels were found to be negative by SNT. Table 2Up shows temperature responses and SNT results for the two dromedaries experimentally infected with the camel strain of ERAV.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Antibody responses recorded against the reference ERAV strain (SWI/V1722/70) in racing dromedaries, the dromedary breeding herd and the neighbouring horse retirement home

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
ERAV has long been known to cause a relatively mild upper respiratory tract infection of horses (Plummer & Kerry, 1962Down). The virus is highly contagious and widespread in equids, being transmitted by the respiratory route (Plummer & Kerry, 1962Down). Experimental infection of man, monkeys, rabbits and guinea pigs has resulted in viraemia, and virus has been recovered from various tissues and an antibody response has been reported in all species studied. However, there is no evidence of virus spreading horizontally in any of these species (Plummer, 1963Down). Intranasal inoculation of a human volunteer with ERAV resulted in severe pharyngitis, lymphadenitis, fever and viraemia (Plummer, 1963Down). Plummer (1962)Down also found high neutralization titres against ERAV in the sera of 3/12 stable workers, whilst no ERAV antibodies could be detected in a control group of 159 non-stable workers. Kriegshauser et al. (2005)Down found only a low prevalence (2.7 %) of weakly neutralizing antibodies to ERAV in human sera obtained from 137 mixed-practice veterinarians, whilst 90 % of 200 horses sampled were positive, many with high titres. A previous serological survey carried out on 439 equine sera from the seven emirates of the United Arab Emirates in 1998 showed that more than 50 % of the horses tested had antibodies to ERAV (Wernery et al., 1999Down). Similarly, in this study, at least 80 % of the 57 retired horses tested were seropositive for ERAV. Together, these results suggest that ERAV is circulating in the United Arab Emirates equine population. The isolation of ERAV from aborted dromedary fetuses, the extremely high prevalence of antibody (>90 %) against ERAV demonstrated in the adult dromedary herd and the subsequent experimental field trials, although small in number, clearly demonstrate that ERAV not only infects dromedaries but can also cause abortion.

Although not proven at this time, it is highly likely that the dromedaries, which had easy access to the horse retirement premises, received their infection from these horses. No respiratory disease was or has ever been observed or reported in the dromedary herd and no such symptoms were observed in the pregnant dromedaries experimentally infected with the camel isolate of ERAV. To check for a possible viraemia, 19 sera collected from each of the experimentally infected dromedaries between days 0 and 22 p.i. were examined for the presence ERAV RNA using a real-time RT-PCR (K. Ebert, S. M. Reid, N. J. Knowles & D. P. King, unpublished data); however, none was detected. Placentation in Camelidae is diffuse epitheliochorial, similar to that of the equine species, and this anatomical particularity may, in part, explain the susceptibility of dromedaries to an equine virus.

The absence of detectable antibody against ERAV in the racing camels is interesting but might only be a reflection of the lack of direct contact between the camels and infectious horses. Further studies are ongoing to study the epidemiology of ERAV in dromedaries.

Two picornaviruses have been isolated previously from camelids, one from a dromedary in an American zoological collection and one from llamas, also in the USA. The virus isolated from heart tissue of the adult dromedary was identified as encephalomyocarditis virus (genus Cardiovirus) and the disease was characterized by pale foci within the myocardium and epicardial haemorrhages associated with excessive pericardial fluid (Wells et al., 1989Down). The second virus was isolated from two aborted llama fetuses but was only identified as ERAV following the report by Stehman et al. (1997)Down of a picornavirus infection in llamas that caused abortion in 15 llamas over a 3.5 month period and at a mean gestation period of 220 days (7–8 months). Concurrent diabetes mellitus was also observed in the dams.

In Kenya, serological evidence of the exposure of free-ranging and captive zebra to ERAV has been presented (Kimber et al., 2002Down). The free-range animals had a higher seroprevalence than captive zebra and the authors speculated on the possible transmission of ERAV between the two groups.

To our knowledge, no reports of abortion in horses have been published, although two viruses (360007 and P1316/92), isolated from a fetus and placenta, respectively (Varrasso et al., 2001Down), and for which the complete capsid sequences have been determined, were said to have come from cases of equine abortion. This might suggest that ERAV-seronegative mares could be at risk if they become infected during pregnancy, although further studies are required to quantify this. In light of the potential risk, it would also be of benefit to ascertain the serological status of mares before and during pregnancy.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
The authors would like to thank Dr A. Billah, Dr T. Morton, Dr M. Ali and Mr F. Gerlach for sampling the animals and assisting with the experiment and Sue Graham for valuable technical assistance. We would also like to thank Dr W. Eichhorn (Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany) for the ERAV strain SWI/V1722/70.


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Burrows, R. (1968). Laboratory diagnosis of some virus infections of the upper respiratory tract of the horse. Equine Vet J 1, 32–38.[Medline]

Ditchfield, J. & Macpherson, L. W. (1965). The properties and classification of two new rhinoviruses recovered from horses in Toronto, Canada. Cornell Vet 55, 181–189.[Medline]

Dynon, K., Varrasso, A., Ficorilli, N., Holloway, S., Reubel, G., Li, F., Hartley, C., Studdert, M. & Drummer, H. (2001). Identification of equine herpesvirus 3 (equine coital exanthema virus), equine gammaherpesviruses 2 and 5, equine adenoviruses 1 and 2, equine arteritis virus and equine rhinitis A virus by polymerase chain reaction. Aust Vet J 79, 695–702.[Medline]

Finney, D. J. (1964). Statistical Methods in Biological Assay, 2nd edn. London: Charles Griffin.

Hofer, B., Steck, F., Gerber, H., Löhrer, J., Nicolet, J. & Paccaud, M. F. (1973). An investigation of the etiology of viral respiratory disease in a remount depot. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Equine Infectious Diseases, pp. 527–545. Edited by J. T. Bryans & H. Gerber. Basel: Karger.

Holmes, D. F., Kemen, M. J. & Coggins, L. (1978). Equine rhinovirus infection – serological evidence of infection in selected United States horse populations. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Equine Infectious Diseases, pp. 315–319. Edited by J. T. Bryans & H. Gerber. Princetown: Veterinary Publications.

Kimber, K. R., Lubroth, J., Dubovi, E. J., Berninger, M. L. & Demaar, T. W. (2002). Serologic survey of selected viral, bacterial, and protozoal agents in captive and free-ranging ungulates from central Kenya. Ann N Y Acad Sci 969, 217–223.[Medline]

Kriegshauser, G., Deutz, A., Kuechler, E., Skern, T., Lussy, H. & Nowotny, N. (2005). Prevalence of neutralizing antibodies to Equine rhinitis A and B virus in horses and man. Vet Microbiol 106, 293–296.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kumar, S., Tamura, K. & Nei, M. (2004). MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5, 150–163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Li, F., Browning, G. F., Studdert, M. J. & Crabb, B. S. (1996). Equine rhinovirus 1 is more closely related to foot-and-mouth disease virus than to other picornaviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 990–995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Li, F., Drummer, H. E., Ficorilli, N., Studdert, M. J. & Crabb, B. S. (1997). Identification of a non-cytopathic equine rhinovirus 1 as a cause of acute febrile respiratory disease in horses. J Clin Microbiol 35, 937–943.[Abstract]

McCollum, W. H. & Timoney, P. J. (1991). Studies on the seroprevalence and frequency of equine rhinovirus-1 and -2 infections in normal horse urine. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Equine Infectious Diseases, pp. 83–87. Edited by W. Plowright, P. D. Rossdale & J. F. Wade. Newmarket: R and W Publications.

Plummer, G. (1962). An equine respiratory virus with enterovirus properties. Nature 195, 519–520.[CrossRef][Medline]

Plummer, G. (1963). An equine respiratory enterovirus: some biological and physical properties. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch 12, 694–700.[CrossRef][Medline]

Plummer, G. & Kerry, J. B. (1962). Studies on an equine respiratory virus. Vet Rec 74, 967–970.

Rosai, J. (1978). The nature of myospherulosis of the upper respiratory tract. Am J Clin Pathol 69, 475–481.[Medline]

Stanway, G., Brown, F., Christian, P., Hovi, T., Hyypiä, T., King, A. M. Q., Knowles, N. J., Lemon, S. M., Minor, P. D. & other authors (2005). Family Picornaviridae. In Virus Taxonomy. Eighth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, pp. 757–778. Edited by C. M. Fauquet, M. A. Mayo, J. Maniloff, U. Desselberger & L. A. Ball. London: Elsevier/Academic Press.

Stehman, S. M., Morris, L. I., Wiesensel, L., Freeman, W., Del Piero, F., Zylich, N. & Dubovi, E. J. (1997). Case report: picornavirus infection associated with abortion and adult onset diabetes mellitus in a herd of llamas. In Proceedings of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians Annual Conference, p. 43. Louisville, USA, 18–24 October 1997.

Studdert, M. J. & Gleeson, L. J. (1977). Isolation of equine rhinovirus type 1. Aust Vet J 53, 452[Medline]

Varrasso, A., Drummer, H. E., Huang, J. A., Stevenson, R. A., Ficorilli, N., Studdert, M. J. & Hartley, C. A. (2001). Sequence conservation and antigenic variation of the structural proteins of equine rhinitis A virus. J Virol 75, 10550–10556.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wells, S. K., Gutter, A. E., Soike, K. F. & Baskin, G. B. (1989). Encephalomyocarditis virus: epizootic in a zoological collection. J Zoo Wildl Med 20, 291–296.

Wernery, U., Wernery, R., Zachariah, R. & Haydn-Evans, J. (1999). Serological survey of some equine infections diseases in the United Arab Emirates. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Equine Infectious Diseases, pp. 367–370. Edited by U. Wernery, Z. F. Wade, J. A. Mumford & O.-R. Kaaden. Dubai, UAE, 23–26 March 1998.

Wutz, G., Auer, H., Nowotny, N., Grosse, B., Skern, T. & Kuechler, E. (1996). Equine rhinovirus serotypes 1 and 2: relationship to each other and to aphthoviruses and cardioviruses. J Gen Virol 77, 1719–1730.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received 18 May 2006; accepted 19 November 2007.



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wernery, U.
Right arrow Articles by Nagy, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wernery, U.
Right arrow Articles by Nagy, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wernery, U.
Right arrow Articles by Nagy, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS