|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short Communication |
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
Correspondence
Richard Longnecker
r-longnecker{at}northwestern.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Published online ahead of print on as DOI 10.1099/vir.0.2008/001461-0.
| MAIN TEXT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The transgenic mouse model used by our laboratory has been invaluable in elucidating the function of LMP2A in vivo. LMP2A expression in vivo interferes with normal B-cell development and allows BCR-negative cells to exit the bone marrow and colonize peripheral lymphoid organs (Caldwell et al., 1998
, 2000
). Normally, successful immunoglobulin heavy-chain (IgH) rearrangement is necessary for the transition from the CD19+CD43+ pre-BI stage to the CD19+CD43– pre-BII stage of development in the bone marrow. Subsequently, the light-chain genes are rearranged and the complex between the light-chain and heavy-chain forms the BCR expressed on the cell surface. Expression of a BCR allows the B cell to transition to the IgM+ immature B-cell stage and migrate out of the bone marrow into the periphery. Unsuccessful rearrangement of the immunoglobulin genes causes the B cell to undergo apoptosis (Era et al., 1991
; Hardy et al., 1991
). The striking phenotype of the TgE LMP2A transgenic mice is the lack of expression of surface IgM on B cells in the bone marrow and spleen. Additionally, although TgE LMP2A mice are unable to rearrange the heavy-chain genes necessary for expression of a pre-BCR or a BCR, they are able to transition to a CD43– stage, albeit less efficiently than a wild-type B cell (Caldwell et al., 1998
, 2000
). These data indicate that LMP2A functions as a surrogate BCR to allow for survival of IgM– cells in the periphery.
For a more thorough understanding of B-cell biology in TgE LMP2A mice, the growth properties of the bone marrow B cells were examined. Bone marrow from TgE LMP2A mice and wild-type (WT) controls was grown in methylcellulose containing interleukin 7 (IL-7) for 7 days (Ikeda & Longnecker, 2005
). Cells were harvested and stained with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies for analysis by flow cytometry. For comparison, Rag2–/– IL-7-dependent cell cultures were used, as these cells are pre-BCR–/IgM–/CD43+ (Corfe et al., 2007
). Cell cultures derived from the bone marrow of TgE LMP2A and WT mice are predominantly B cells that express CD43 (Fig. 1
, 84 and 85 %, respectively). To extend the finding that the B cells of TgE LMP2A mice bypass developmental checkpoints, an antibody that recognizes the pre-BCR (µ IgH,
5 and V preB) was used (Fig. 1
). Forty percent of the bone marrow cells from wild-type mice express a pre-BCR, in contrast to barely detectable levels in TgE LMP2A and Rag2–/– cells. These data show that, not only do TgE LMP2A mice lack a BCR; they are also lacking a pre-BCR. Therefore, LMP2A may provide signals that mimic those normally provided by the pre-BCR.
|
|
It has been suggested that the ability of B cells to proliferate depends upon reaching a threshold of ERK activation. This threshold of phosphorylated ERK can be achieved either through high concentrations of IL-7 available for signalling through the IL-7 receptor, or tonic signalling through the pre-BCR (Bannish et al., 2001
; Fleming & Paige, 2001
; Fuentes-Panana et al., 2004
; Marshall et al., 1998
; Shaffer & Schlissel, 1997
; Teh & Neuberger, 1997
). TgE LMP2A bone marrow B cells can proliferate in low IL-7 in the absence of a pre-BCR; therefore we examined the levels of phosphorylated ERK. Cells were washed and starved in the presence of DMSO or inhibitor, and restimulated after 3 h as described previously (Fleming & Paige, 2001
). TgE LMP2A cells have constitutively activated ERK (P-ERK) independent of the presence of IL-7, similar to pre-BCR+ WT cells (Fig. 3
). P-ERK induction for WT cells appears higher than TgE LMP2A cells due to the unequal loading between cell types, evident by comparing the levels of total ERK for each. Rag2–/– cells that have been starved do not express P-ERK unless they are restimulated with IL-7. This result is specific, as treatment with an inhibitor of the ERK/MAPK pathway, 15 µM PD98059 MEK inhibitor, decreases the amount of phosphorylated ERK in both TgE LMP2A and WT cells independent of IL-7 stimulation. Additionally, treatment with an inhibitor of the PI3K pathway, 20 µM LY294002, results in decreased phosphorylated ERK and Akt, indicating that TgE LMP2A and WT cells use similar signalling pathways to activate ERK/MAPK. This result is consistent with previous results that demonstrate inhibition of PI3K activity blocks ERK activation, probably through PLC
(Jacob et al., 2002
). These results suggest that LMP2A in TgE cells supplies a signal that mimics signalling by the pre-BCR through activation of the ERK/MAPK and PI3K pathway, and provides a plausible explanation for proliferation in low concentrations of IL-7.
|
The amino-terminus of LMP2A contains two serine residues, S15 and S102, which are conserved among related
-herpesviruses (Longnecker, 2000
). LMP2A is serine phosphorylated and has been demonstrated to be a substrate for phosphorylation by ERK/MAPK (Longnecker et al., 1991
; Panousis & Rowe, 1997
). Additionally, a glutathione S-transferase fusion to the amino-terminal 112 amino acids of LMP2A can interact with ERK/MAPK; however, the outcome of this interaction in the context of LMP2A function in B cells has yet to be determined (Panousis & Rowe, 1997
). In epithelial cells, LMP2A activates ERK/MAPK and promotes mobility, which may be important for metastasis (Chen et al., 2002
). Data demonstrating that LMP2A constitutively activates the ERK/MAPK pathway in bone marrow B cells similar to pre-BCR+ wild-type B cells provide evidence that this pathway may be important for LMP2A-mediated proliferation in vivo. Indirectly, this suggests that LMP2A may use the ERK/MAPK interaction to provide proliferation signals to B cells; however, systems to study LMP2A-mediated proliferation amenable to mutational analysis are currently lacking. With the advent of new culture systems, it will be interesting to investigate whether S15 and S102 are important for LMP2A function.
Pre-BCR-dependent processes include IgH allelic exclusion, IL-7-dependent pro-B cell expansion, maturation through the pro-B to pre-B checkpoint and IgL recombination (Monroe, 2006
). Ig-
and Ig-β are both necessary and sufficient for pre-BCR signal transduction, and Src family protein tyrosine kinases (PTK) including Blk, Fyn and Lyn are involved in the pre-BCR signal (Monroe, 2006
). It is interesting to note that, like Ig-
and Ig-β, LMP2A contains an ITAM and expression of LMP2A in B cells leads to the constitutive activation of Src family PTKs (Burkhardt et al., 1992
; Fruehling et al., 1996
, 1998
; Fruehling & Longnecker, 1997
). Therefore, it is not surprising that, with the exception of IgH allelic exclusion, LMP2A mediates pre-BCR-dependent processes. It has long been predicted that LMP2A may provide a surrogate pre-BCR signal because, in transgenic mice expressing LMP2A, heavy chain rearrangement is bypassed and IgM– cells exit the bone marrow (Caldwell et al., 1998
). Additionally, expression of LMP2A during development leads to a downregulation of genes critical for the proper formation of a pre-BCR including V preB, Rag2, mb-1 (Ig-
) and
5, as shown by microarray analysis (Portis et al., 2003
). B cells in LMP2A TgE mice also express increased levels of Bcl-xL, an anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family member that is normally upregulated when the pre-BCR is formed during B-cell development (Fang et al., 1996
). It has been proposed that Bcl-xL functions to maintain cell survival during the formation of a pre-BCR, and it is possible that LMP2A maintains Bcl-xL expression levels by providing pre-BCR-like signals (Portis & Longnecker, 2004
). Data presented here demonstrate that LMP2A indeed elicits a pre-BCR-like signal to developing B cells, providing signals for proliferation and survival through the ERK/MAPK and PI3K/Akt pathways. These observations allow for the conclusion that LMP2A is sufficient to fulfill or bypass the known processes that are dependent upon a pre-BCR signal.
Several studies have demonstrated that the function of LMP2A and the outcome of expression depend upon the cellular context (Caldwell et al., 1998
; Fukuda & Longnecker, 2005
; Konishi et al., 2001
; Lu et al., 2006
; Mancao & Hammerschmidt, 2007
; Miller et al., 1993
, 1994
; Morrison et al., 2003
; Portis et al., 2003
; Scholle et al., 2000
; Swanson-Mungerson et al., 2005
, 2006
). The common theme among these studies, however, is a role for LMP2A in signalling for aberrant survival and/or proliferation. LMP2A is consistently detected in EBV-associated malignancies, including Hodgkin's lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease and Burkitt's lymphoma (Bell et al., 2006
; Konishi et al., 2001
; Rechsteiner et al., 2007
; Rickinson & Kieff, 2007
; Tao et al., 1998
; Xue et al., 2002
). Although LMP2A is not considered a true viral oncogene, evidence that LMP2A promotes survival and proliferation in the absence of a growth factor such as IL-7 implicates a role for LMP2A in the maintenance or progression of malignancies. One of the key steps in lymphomagenesis is often to abrogate cytokine dependence. In fact, constitutive activation of MEK, a downstream kinase in the ERK/MAPK pathway, can lead to abrogation of cytokine dependence in cell lines (Steelman et al., 2004
). That LMP2A constitutively activates the ERK/MAPK pathway further supports the idea that LMP2A plays a more active role in lymphomagenesis, and is not just an innocent bystander. The constitutive activation of the ERK/MAPK and PI3K/Akt pathways in bone marrow B cells adds to a growing list of signal transduction pathways involved in proliferation and survival that are activated by LMP2A. Altogether, this suggests that, perhaps in functioning during viral latency, LMP2A inadvertently contributes to EBV-associated malignancies.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bell, A. I., Groves, K., Kelly, G. L., Croom-Carter, D., Hui, E., Chan, A. T. & Rickinson, A. B. (2006). Analysis of Epstein–Barr virus latent gene expression in endemic Burkitt's lymphoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumour cells by using quantitative real-time PCR assays. J Gen Virol 87, 2885–2890.
Burkhardt, A. L., Bolen, J. B., Kieff, E. & Longnecker, R. (1992). An Epstein-Barr virus transformation-associated membrane protein interacts with src family tyrosine kinases. J Virol 66, 5161–5167.
Caldwell, R. G., Wilson, J. B., Anderson, S. J. & Longnecker, R. (1998). Epstein-Barr virus LMP2A drives B cell development and survival in the absence of normal B cell receptor signals. Immunity 9, 405–411.[CrossRef][Medline]
Caldwell, R. G., Brown, R. C. & Longnecker, R. (2000). Epstein-Barr virus LMP2A-induced B-cell survival in two unique classes of EmuLMP2A transgenic mice. J Virol 74, 1101–1113.
Chen, S. Y., Lu, J., Shih, Y. C. & Tsai, C. H. (2002). Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 2A regulates c-Jun protein through extracellular signal-regulated kinase. J Virol 76, 9556–9561.
Corcoran, A. E., Smart, F. M., Cowling, R. J., Crompton, T., Owen, M. J. & Venkitaraman, A. R. (1996). The interleukin-7 receptor alpha chain transmits distinct signals for proliferation and differentiation during B lymphopoiesis. EMBO J 15, 1924–1932.[Medline]
Corfe, S. A., Gray, A. P. & Paige, C. J. (2007). Generation and characterization of stromal cell independent IL-7 dependent B cell lines. J Immunol Methods 325, 9–19.[CrossRef][Medline]
Era, T., Ogawa, M., Nishikawa, S., Okamoto, M., Honjo, T., Akagi, K., Miyazaki, J. & Yamamura, K. (1991). Differentiation of growth signal requirement of B lymphocyte precursor is directed by expression of immunoglobulin. EMBO J 10, 337–342.[Medline]
Fang, W., Mueller, D. L., Pennell, C. A., Rivard, J. J., Li, Y. S., Hardy, R. R., Schlissel, M. S. & Behrens, T. W. (1996). Frequent aberrant immunoglobulin gene rearrangements in pro-B cells revealed by a bcl-xL transgene. Immunity 4, 291–299.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fleming, H. E. & Paige, C. J. (2001). Pre-B cell receptor signaling mediates selective response to IL-7 at the pro-B to pre-B cell transition via an ERK/MAP kinase-dependent pathway. Immunity 15, 521–531.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fleming, H. E. & Paige, C. J. (2002). Cooperation between IL-7 and the pre-B cell receptor: a key to B cell selection. Semin Immunol 14, 423–430.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fruehling, S. & Longnecker, R. (1997). The immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif of Epstein-Barr virus LMP2A is essential for blocking BCR-mediated signal transduction. Virology 235, 241–251.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fruehling, S., Lee, S. K., Herrold, R., Frech, B., Laux, G., Kremmer, E., Grasser, F. A. & Longnecker, R. (1996). Identification of latent membrane protein 2A (LMP2A) domains essential for the LMP2A dominant-negative effect on B-lymphocyte surface immunoglobulin signal transduction. J Virol 70, 6216–6226.[Abstract]
Fruehling, S., Swart, R., Dolwick, K. M., Kremmer, E. & Longnecker, R. (1998). Tyrosine 112 of latent membrane protein 2A is essential for protein tyrosine kinase loading and regulation of Epstein-Barr virus latency. J Virol 72, 7796–7806.
Fuentes-Panana, E. M., Bannish, G., Shah, N. & Monroe, J. G. (2004). Basal Ig
/Igβ signals trigger the coordinated initiation of pre-B cell antigen receptor-dependent processes. J Immunol 173, 1000–1011.
Fukuda, M. & Longnecker, R. (2005). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latent membrane protein 2A regulates B-cell receptor-induced apoptosis and EBV reactivation through tyrosine phosphorylation. J Virol 79, 8655–8660.
Hardy, R. R., Carmack, C. E., Shinton, S. A., Kemp, J. D. & Hayakawa, K. (1991). Resolution and characterization of pro-B and pre-pro-B cell stages in normal mouse bone marrow. J Exp Med 173, 1213–1225.
Ikeda, M. & Longnecker, R. (2005). Pre-B-cell colony formation assay. Methods Mol Biol 292, 279–284.[Medline]
Jacob, A., Cooney, D., Pradhan, M. & Coggeshall, K. M. (2002). Convergence of signaling pathways on the activation of ERK in B cells. J Biol Chem 277, 23420–23426.
Kieff, E. D. & Rickinson, A. B. (2007). Epstein-Barr virus and its replication. In Fields Virology, 5th edn, pp. 2603–2654. Edited by P. M. H. David, M. Knipe, D. E. Griffin, R. A. Lamb, M. A. Martin, B. Roizman & S. E. Straus. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
Konishi, K., Maruo, S., Kato, H. & Takada, K. (2001). Role of Epstein–Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein 2A on virus-induced immortalization and virus activation. J Gen Virol 82, 1451–1456.
Longnecker, R. (2000). Epstein-Barr virus latency: LMP2, a regulator or means for Epstein-Barr virus persistence? Adv Cancer Res 79, 175–200.[Medline]
Longnecker, R., Druker, B., Roberts, T. M. & Kieff, E. (1991). An Epstein-Barr virus protein associated with cell growth transformation interacts with a tyrosine kinase. J Virol 65, 3681–3692.
Lu, J., Lin, W. H., Chen, S. Y., Longnecker, R., Tsai, S. C., Chen, C. L. & Tsai, C. H. (2006). Syk tyrosine kinase mediates Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 2A-induced cell migration in epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 281, 8806–8814.
Mancao, C. & Hammerschmidt, W. (2007). Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 2A is a B-cell receptor mimic and essential for B-cell survival. Blood 110, 3715–3721.
Marshall, A. J., Fleming, H. E., Wu, G. E. & Paige, C. J. (1998). Modulation of the IL-7 dose-response threshold during pro-B cell differentiation is dependent on pre-B cell receptor expression. J Immunol 161, 6038–6045.
Miller, C. L., Longnecker, R. & Kieff, E. (1993). Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 2A blocks calcium mobilization in B lymphocytes. J Virol 67, 3087–3094.
Miller, C. L., Lee, J. H., Kieff, E. & Longnecker, R. (1994). An integral membrane protein (LMP2) blocks reactivation of Epstein-Barr virus from latency following surface immunoglobulin crosslinking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91, 772–776.
Miller, C. L., Burkhardt, A. L., Lee, J. H., Stealey, B., Longnecker, R., Bolen, J. B. & Kieff, E. (1995). Integral membrane protein 2 of Epstein-Barr virus regulates reactivation from latency through dominant negative effects on protein-tyrosine kinases. Immunity 2, 155–166.[CrossRef][Medline]
Monroe, J. G. (2006). ITAM-mediated tonic signalling through pre-BCR and BCR complexes. Nat Rev Immunol 6, 283–294.[CrossRef][Medline]
Morrison, J. A., Klingelhutz, A. J. & Raab-Traub, N. (2003). Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 2A activates β-catenin signaling in epithelial cells. J Virol 77, 12276–12284.
Panousis, C. G. & Rowe, D. T. (1997). Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 2 associates with and is a substrate for mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Virol 71, 4752–4760.[Abstract]
Portis, T. & Longnecker, R. (2004). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) LMP2A mediates B-lymphocyte survival through constitutive activation of the Ras/PI3K/Akt pathway. Oncogene 23, 8619–8628.[CrossRef][Medline]
Portis, T., Dyck, P. & Longnecker, R. (2003). Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) LMP2A induces alterations in gene transcription similar to those observed in Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 102, 4166–4178.
Rechsteiner, M. P., Berger, C., Weber, M., Sigrist, J. A., Nadal, D. & Bernasconi, M. (2007). Silencing of latent membrane protein 2B reduces susceptibility to activation of lytic Epstein–Barr virus in Burkitt's lymphoma Akata cells. J Gen Virol 88, 1454–1459.
Rickinson, A. B. & Kieff, E. (2007). Epstein-Barr virus. In Fields Virology, 5th edn, pp. 2655–2700. Edited by P. M. H. David, M. Knipe, D. E. Griffin, R. A. Lamb, M. A. Martin, B. Roizman & S. E. Straus. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
Scholle, F., Bendt, K. M. & Raab-Traub, N. (2000). Epstein-Barr virus LMP2A transforms epithelial cells, inhibits cell differentiation, and activates Akt. J Virol 74, 10681–10689.
Shaffer, A. L. & Schlissel, M. S. (1997). A truncated heavy chain protein relieves the requirement for surrogate light chains in early B cell development. J Immunol 159, 1265–1275.[Abstract]
Steelman, L. S., Pohnert, S. C., Shelton, J. G., Franklin, R. A., Bertrand, F. E. & McCubrey, J. A. (2004). JAK/STAT, Raf/MEK/ERK, PI3K/Akt and BCR-ABL in cell cycle progression and leukemogenesis. Leukemia 18, 189–218.[CrossRef][Medline]
Swanson-Mungerson, M. A., Caldwell, R. G., Bultema, R. & Longnecker, R. (2005). Epstein-Barr virus LMP2A alters in vivo and in vitro models of B-cell anergy, but not deletion, in response to autoantigen. J Virol 79, 7355–7362.
Swanson-Mungerson, M., Bultema, R. & Longnecker, R. (2006). Epstein-Barr virus LMP2A enhances B-cell responses in vivo and in vitro. J Virol 80, 6764–6770.
Tao, Q., Robertson, K. D., Manns, A., Hildesheim, A. & Ambinder, R. F. (1998). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in endemic Burkitt's lymphoma: molecular analysis of primary tumor tissue. Blood 91, 1373–1381.
Teh, Y. M. & Neuberger, M. S. (1997). The immunoglobulin (Ig)
and Igβ cytoplasmic domains are independently sufficient to signal B cell maturation and activation in transgenic mice. J Exp Med 185, 1753–1758.
Thorley-Lawson, D. A. (2005). EBV the prototypical human tumor virus–just how bad is it? J Allergy Clin Immunol 116, 251–261.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thorley-Lawson, D. A. & Gross, A. (2004). Persistence of the Epstein-Barr virus and the origins of associated lymphomas. N Engl J Med 350, 1328–1337.
Xue, S. A., Labrecque, L. G., Lu, Q. L., Ong, S. K., Lampert, I. A., Kazembe, P., Molyneux, E., Broadhead, R. L., Borgstein, E. & Griffin, B. E. (2002). Promiscuous expression of Epstein-Barr virus genes in Burkitt's lymphoma from the central African country Malawi. Int J Cancer 99, 635–643.[CrossRef][Medline]
Received 20 February 2008;
accepted 23 April 2008.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |