J Gen Virol Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 89 (2008), 1777-1788; DOI 10.1099/vir.0.2008/001255-0

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tamgüney, G.
Right arrow Articles by Prusiner, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tamgüney, G.
Right arrow Articles by Prusiner, S. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tamgüney, G.
Right arrow Articles by Prusiner, S. B.

Genes contributing to prion pathogenesis

Gültekin Tamgüney1,2, Kurt Giles1,2, David V. Glidden3, Pierre Lessard1, Holger Wille1,2, Patrick Tremblay1,2,{dagger}, Darlene F. Groth1, Fruma Yehiely1,{ddagger}, Carsten Korth1,§, Richard C. Moore1,||, Jörg Tatzelt2,, Eric Rubinstein4, Claude Boucheix4, Xiaoping Yang5,#, Pamela Stanley5, Michael P. Lisanti6, Raymond A. Dwek7, Pauline M. Rudd7,{dagger}{dagger}, Jackob Moskovitz8, Charles J. Epstein9, Tracey Dawson Cruz10,{ddagger}{ddagger}, William A. Kuziel10,§§, Nobuyo Maeda10, Jan Sap11, Karen Hsiao Ashe12, George A. Carlson13, Ina Tesseur14,||||, Tony Wyss-Coray14,15, Lennart Mucke2,16,17, Karl H. Weisgraber17,18, Robert W. Mahley17,18, Fred E. Cohen1,19 and Stanley B. Prusiner1,2

1 Institute for Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
2 Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
4 INSERM, U602, and Université Paris 11, Villejuif, France
5 Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
6 Muscular and Neurodegenerative Disease Unit, University of Genova and G. Gaslini Pediatric Institute, Genova, Italy
6 Department of Cancer Biology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
7 Department of Biochemistry and Oxford Glycobiology Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
8 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
9 Institute for Human Genetics and Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
10 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
11 Biotechnology Research and Innovation Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
12 Departments of Neurology, Neuroscience and Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, and Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
13 McLaughlin Research Institute, Great Falls, MT, USA
14 Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
15 Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
16 Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
17 Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
18 Cardiovascular Research Institute and Departments of Medicine and Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
19 Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

Correspondence
Stanley B. Prusiner
stanley{at}ind.ucsf.edu


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Prion diseases are caused by conversion of a normally folded, non-pathogenic isoform of the prion protein (PrPC) to a misfolded, pathogenic isoform (PrPSc). Prion inoculation experiments in mice expressing homologous PrPC molecules on different genetic backgrounds displayed different incubation times, indicating that the conversion reaction may be influenced by other gene products. To identify genes that contribute to prion pathogenesis, we analysed incubation times of prions in mice in which the gene product was inactivated, knocked out or overexpressed. We tested 20 candidate genes, because their products either colocalize with PrP, are associated with Alzheimer's disease, are elevated during prion disease, or function in PrP-mediated signalling, PrP glycosylation, or protein maintenance. Whereas some of the candidates tested may have a role in the normal function of PrPC, our data show that many genes previously implicated in prion replication have no discernible effect on the pathogenesis of prion disease. While most genes tested did not significantly affect survival times, ablation of the amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein (App) or interleukin-1 receptor, type I (Il1r1), and transgenic overexpression of human superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) prolonged incubation times by 13, 16 and 19 %, respectively.

{dagger}Present address: Pappas Ventures, Montreal, QC H3A 1X6, Canada. Back

{ddagger}Present address: Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. Back

§Present address: Institute for Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40001 Düsseldorf, Germany. Back

||Present address: Department of Genetics and Genomics, Roslin Institute, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, Scotland, UK. Back

Present address: Department of Biochemistry, Neurobiochemistry, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany. Back

#Present address: University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Back

{dagger}{dagger}Present address: Dublin-Oxford Glycobiology Laboratory, University College, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. Back

{ddagger}{ddagger}Present address: Departments of Forensic Science and Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284-3079, USA. Back

§§Present address: PDL BioPharma, Inc., Redwood City, CA 94063, USA. Back

||||Present address: Center for Human Genetics, K.U. Leuven, Department of Molecular and Developmental Genetics, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Back

Supplementary material is available with the online version of this paper.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Prion diseases are fatal neurodegenerative disorders of humans and animals that uniquely present as sporadic, genetic or infectious maladies (Prusiner, 2007Down). These diseases are caused by prions, which are formed from the conformational conversion of a ubiquitous and non-infectious isoform of the prion protein (PrPC) to disease-associated and infectious isoforms (PrPSc). Prions are unprecedented pathogens because nucleic acids are not involved in their replication (Safar et al., 2005Down). Genetic experiments have shown that the Prnp gene, which encodes PrPC, controls the incubation period in prion-infected mice (Carlson et al., 1986Down). In addition, evidence from experiments in inbred mice expressing homologous PrPC molecules shows that genes other than Prnp modify the incubation period to some extent (Carlson et al., 1988Down; Stephenson et al., 2000Down). Similarly, studies in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae show that chaperones of the Hsp104, Hsp70 and Hsp40 groups are critical for the propagation of yeast prions [PSI+], [URE3] and [PIN+] (reviewed by Wickner et al., 2007Down).

Based on these studies, any gene product involved in the formation of PrPSc should affect the onset of prion disease if knocked out, inactivated or overexpressed as demonstrated for PrP itself (Prusiner et al., 1993Down, 1990Down). Many genes have been suggested to contribute to prion replication, of which we tested 20 (Table 1Down). Mice in which the candidate gene product was inactivated, ablated or overexpressed were inoculated and incubation times relative to control mice were recorded (Tables 2Down–5Down). To determine whether differences in incubation period were significant, we developed a novel statistical method accounting for interexperiment variability. While most of the tested genes did not play a role in prion disease, we show here that mice deficient for the amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein (App) or interleukin-1 receptor, type I (Il1r1) genes had prolonged incubation times by 13 and 16 %, respectively. Similarly, overexpression of human superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) extended disease-onset times by 19 %.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Proteins tested for their effect on prion replication

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Prion transmission to mouse models relevant to Alzheimer's disease

Mice were inoculated i.c. with RML prions.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Prion transmission to mouse models relevant to cell signalling

Unless indicated, mice were inoculated i.c. with RML prions.

 

   METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Source of mice.
Most mouse lines have been described previously. App–/– mice lack the amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein (App) (Zheng et al., 1995Down). Aplp2–/– mice lack the amyloid beta (A4) precursor-like protein 2 (Aplp2) (von Koch et al., 1997Down). Tg(APP)6209Kahs mice, originally designated Tg(HuAPP695.WTmyc)6209, express human APP695 (Hsiao et al., 1995Down). Tg(APOE3) and Tg(APOE4) mice, originally named Tg(NSE-apoE3) and Tg(NSE-apoE4), express the {epsilon}3 or the {epsilon}4 allele of human apolipoprotein E (APOE) driven by the neuron-specific enolase (NSE) promoter on a C57BL/6J-Apoe–/– (C57BL/6J-Apoetm1Unc) background (Raber et al., 1998Down). Tg(Tgfb1) mice express porcine transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) driven by the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) promoter on an SJL/J background (Wyss-Coray et al., 1995Down). Tgfb1+/– mice with one ablated Tgfb1 allele were generated on the NIH/Ola background (Shull et al., 1992Down). Ccr2–/– and Ccr5–/– mice lack chemokine (C-C motif) receptors 2 (CCR2) and CCR5, respectively (Kuziel et al., 1997Down, 2003Down). (TβRII{Delta}k)+/–xTg(tTA)+/– Prnp+/– mice neuronally express a transdominant-negative kinase-deficient mutant of TGF-β receptor II (TβRII{Delta}k) and are deficient in TGF-β signalling (Tesseur et al., 2006Down). Msra–/– mice lack methionine sulfoxide reductase A (Moskovitz et al., 2001Down). Tg(SOD1)3Cje mice overexpress human superoxide dismutase 1, soluble (SOD1); their littermate controls are (BALB/cxC57BL/6J)F1x(C57BL/6JxDBA/2)F1 (Epstein et al., 1987Down). Tg(HSP70) mice express human heat-shock protein 70 (Hsp70); their wild-type (wt) controls are (CBAxC57BL/6J)F1 mice (Plumier et al., 1995Down). Mgat3–/– mice lack mannoside-b1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (Yang et al., 2000Down). Cd9–/– mice lack the CD9 antigen (Le Naour et al., 2000Down). Cav1–/– mice lack caveolin-1 (Williams et al., 2003Down). Fyn–/– mice lack fyn proto-oncogene (Fyn) (Grant et al., 1992Down). Tg(Fyn) mice overexpress wt mouse Fyn directed by the calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II{alpha} promoter on a C57BL/6 background (line N8) (Kojima et al., 1997Down). Ptpra–/– mice lack protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, A (RPTP{alpha}) (Petrone et al., 2003Down). Prnd-ablated mice on an FVB background were produced in our laboratory as described in Supplementary material (available in JGV Online).

The following mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory: Apoe–/– mice on a C57BL/6J background (C57BL/6J-Apoetm1Unc); interleukin-10 (IL-10)-knockout mice on a C57BL/6J background, denoted B6-IL-10–/– mice (B6.129P2-Il10tm1Cgn/J); IL-10-knockout mice on a 129S6 background, denoted 129-IL-10–/– mice (129-Il10tm1Cgn/J); tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-deficient mice, denoted Tnf–/– mice (B6.129S6-Tnftm1Gkl/J); mice lacking Tnf receptor superfamily, members 1a (TNF-R1) and 1b (TNF-R2), denoted Tnfrsf1a–/– Tnfrsf1b–/– mice (B6;129S-Tnfrsf1atm1Imx Tnfrsf1btm1Imx/J); and IL-1 receptor, type I-knockout mice, denoted Il1r1–/– mice (B6;129S1-Il1r1tm1Roml/J). C57BL/6J, 129S1/SvImJ, B6129SF2/J and FVB/N mice were obtained as controls. Crossing Tnfrsf1a+/+ Tnfrsf1b+/+ mice with B6129SF2/J mice gave Tnfrsf1a+/– Tnfrsf1b+/– mice. Crossing Il1r1+/+ mice with B6129SF2/J mice yielded Il1r1+/– mice. The genetic status of the progeny was determined using protocols from the Jackson Laboratory.

Prion isolates and transmission.
CD1 mouse-adapted RML, Me7 and 301V prions were used as inocula. RML and Me7 were originally derived from sheep with scrapie and have been serially passaged in mice for many generations; 301V was derived from a cow with BSE and passaged into VM mice (Bruce et al., 1994Down; Chandler, 1961Down; Dickinson & Meikle, 1969Down). Brain homogenates (10 % w/v) in PBS (pH 7.4) were obtained by 10 repeated extrusions through syringe needles of successively smaller sizes, from 18 to 22 gauge, or alternatively by three 30 s strokes of a PowerGen homogenizer (Fisher Scientific). A final 1 % (w/v) brain homogenate for inoculation was obtained by further diluting brain homogenates in 5 % (w/v) bovine albumin Fraction V (ICN) and PBS. Using a 27-gauge syringe, 30 µl of 1 % brain homogenate was inoculated into the right parietal lobe, or 200 µl into the peritoneal cavity of mice. Animals were monitored daily for their clinical status, while the neurological status was assessed three times per week. Mice with progressive neurological dysfunction were euthanized (Carlson et al., 1986Down).


   RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
The experimental paradigm of this study was to investigate the influence of 20 genes on the incubation time in prion-infected mice in which the gene product was either inactive, absent or overexpressed.

Modelling disease onset times
To determine the genotype-independent variation in incubation time, we intracerebrally (i.c.) inoculated over 400 wt FVB/N mice, which were divided into 39 groups at six different time points over a 5 year period, with RML prions (Supplementary Table S1 available in JGV Online, Fig. 1Down). Median incubation times were calculated for all 39 groups using the Kaplan–Meier function and mice with intercurrent illness were censored at the time of euthanasia (Kaplan & Meier, 1958Down). Although these mice were genetically identical, we observed appreciable variation in median incubation times among different groups of mice ranging between 103 and 137 days for individual groups. This variation was not restricted to wt FVB/N mice and was also evident in C57BL/6J and CD1 mice (data not shown). Since the commonly used logrank test does not take into account this type of experiment-to-experiment variation among genotypically identical mice, we developed a method to compare better the survival curves of prion-diseased mice. Based on our observations, disease-onset times fitted well to a Weibull regression model with the effects of genotypes following an accelerated failure time model (Tables 2Up–5Up) (Cox & Oakes, 1984Down). This model accommodates for the fact that, in a group of prion-infected mice with the same genotype, all the animals become sick within a very close time interval once single animals start to show symptoms. To account for experiment-to-experiment variation, we included a gamma-distributed random effect term in the Weibull model that was weighted by the interexperimental variation observed in RML-inoculated FVB/N mice (Supplementary Table S1, Fig. 1Down) (Glidden & Vittinghoff, 2004Down; Nielsen et al., 1992Down). This improved the accuracy of our statistical evaluation and led to p-values (pWG) that were generally higher than those obtained with the logrank test (pL) (Tables 2Up–5Up). Effects of experiments in mice expressing neither, one, or both alleles of Il1r1, Tnfrsf1a and Tnfrsf1b, Cd9 and Prnd were also tested for trend (Vittinghoff et al., 2005Down). For a given gene, the trend test delivers increased significance, when incubation times are increasingly prolonged or shortened based on the number of alleles present. The relative time for each genotype shown in Tables 2Up–5Up was calculated from the accelerated failure time model, which takes into account both medians and interpercentile ranges of disease-onset times from genetically modified mice and control mice. All calculations were performed with Intercooled Stata 9.2 (StataCorp).


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Survival curves from transmissions of RML prions to six sets of FVB/N mice. Animals in each set were inoculated on the same day. Median incubation times ranged between 103 and 137 days.

 
Deficiency in App prolongs prion incubation times
To analyse the effect of the five Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related proteins on the incubation time in prion disease, we inoculated five different mouse models and their respective controls with RML prions (Table 2Up). App–/– mice deficient in App expression developed signs of prion disease at approximately 136 days, whereas wt mice had a median incubation time of 121 days (Fig. 2aDown). Taking interexperimental variation into account, this 13 % protraction of disease-onset times in App–/– mice was slight but significant (pWG=0.030). In contrast, lack of Aplp2 expression in Aplp2–/– mice or overexpression of human APP695 in Tg(APP)6209Kahs mice had no significant effect on incubation times (Supplementary Fig. S2a and b available in JGV Online). Similarly, expression of human APOE3 or APOE4 alleles in Apoe–/– mice did not result in significant differences in the incubation times when compared to Apoe–/– mice (Supplementary Fig. S2c and d).


Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Survival curves from transmissions of RML prions to (a) App–/– mice (b) Il1rI–/– mice (black line) and Il1rI+/– mice (dashed line) (c) B6-IL-10–/– mice (d) 129Sv-IL-10–/– mice and (e) Tg(SOD1)3Cje (solid lines). In panel (e), Tg(SOD1)3Cje mice were also inoculated with 301V prions (dashed lines). Survival curves of controls are shown by grey lines. Tick marks signify censored animals.

 
Deficiency of a functional IL-1 receptor prolongs prion incubation times
We assayed six genes associated with inflammation for their effect on the prion incubation time (Table 3Down). Mice with an ablated IL-1 receptor, type I gene (Il1r1–/–) lack a functional receptor for the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1{alpha} and IL-1β and showed 16 % longer incubation times compared with control mice (Fig. 2bUp). Although small, this prolongation was statistically significant (pWG=0.012).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Prion transmission to mouse models relevant to inflammation

Mice were inoculated i.c. with RML prions.

 
Mice deficient in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 had a 19 % reduction in the incubation period compared with wt mice. However, this reduction was observed only in IL-10–/– mice on the C57BL/6J background and not in mice with the 129S1/SvImJ background (Fig. 2c and dUp).

None of the other four inflammation-associated genes affected incubation times (Supplementary Fig. S3a–f available in JGV Online). In two mouse models, inhibited TNF-{alpha} signalling resulted in incubation times similar to controls (Supplementary Fig. S3a and b). We also found that TGF-β1 signalling had no effect on prion incubation times, using three different mouse models: Tg(Tgfb1) mice overexpressing TGF-β1, heterozygous Tg(Tgfb1+/–) mice and double-transgenic Tg(TβRII{Delta}k)+/–xTg(tTA)+/– Prnp+/– mice expressing a transdominant-negative mutant of TGF-β receptor II that disrupts TGF-β signalling (Supplementary Fig. S3c and d). Deficiency of CCR2 or CCR5 also did not influence prion incubation times (Supplementary Fig. S3e and f).

Proteins associated with protein maintenance do not influence prion incubation times
We tested the influence of four genes relevant to protein expression and maintenance on prion incubation times (Table 4Down). The methionine sulfoxide reductase (Msr) system consisting of MsrA and MsrB reverts methionine sulfoxide to methionine and thereby protects from oxidative stress (Moskovitz & Stadtman, 2003Down). We tested the effect of oxidative stress on prion replication in MsrA-knockout mice on a regular or on a selenium-depleted diet that further disables the Msr system by inactivating MsrB, which as a selenoprotein requires selenium to be fully active. MsrA-deficient mice that were kept on a regular or selenium-depleted diet did not show incubation times significantly different from those of control mice (Supplementary Fig. S4a available in JGV Online). Incubation times in Tg(SOD1)3Cje mice that overexpress human superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) were significantly extended (pWG=0.016) by 19 % after infection with RML prions (Fig. 2eUp), compared with wt littermates. However, this prolongation was not observed when Tg(SOD1)3Cje mice were infected with the 301V prion strain. Tg(HSP70) mice, which overexpress human Hsp70, did not show significantly altered incubation times compared to wt littermates (Supplementary Fig. S4b available in JGV Online). Finally, we addressed whether post-translational modifications impact on PrP conversion in mice lacking mannoside-b1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (Mgat3/GlcNAcT-III). In comparison to PrPC, PrPSc contains decreased levels of N-glycans with a bisecting GlcNAc residue and increased levels of tri- and tetra-antennary complex N-glycans, which may result from a decrease in Mgat3/GlcNAcT-III activity (Rudd et al., 1999Down). Incubation times in Mgat3–/– mice did not differ significantly from wt littermates, even when mice were inoculated with three different prion strains: RML, ME7 and 301V (Supplementary Fig. S4b).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Prion transmission to mouse models relevant to protein maintenance

Unless indicated, mice were inoculated i.c. with RML prions.

 
Proteins associated with PrP signalling, doppel and CD9 do not influence prion incubation times
We investigated the effect of three genes that are seemingly relevant to PrP signalling on prion replication (Table 5Up). Incubation times in caveolin-1-deficient mice inoculated either i.c. or intraperitoneally (i.p.) did not differ significantly from those of FVB/N control mice (Supplementary Fig. S5a available in JGV Online). Mice neither lacking nor overexpressing Fyn showed altered incubation times upon infection when compared to wt mice (Supplementary Fig. S5b and c). Ptpra–/– mice deficient for RPTP{alpha} also did not have significantly altered incubation times (Supplementary Fig. S5d). As part of this work, we created Prnd–/– mice that lack expression of the PrP paralogue doppel (Dpl), which did not show any morphological or behavioural defects except for male infertility, as reported earlier (Behrens et al., 2002Down). Neither Prnd+/– nor Prnd–/– mice showed significantly modified incubation times when compared to wt mice (Supplementary Fig. S5e). Also, we did not find significantly different incubation times from Cd9–/– mice, heterozygous Cd9+/– mice or wt mice after i.c. inoculation with RML prions (Supplementary Fig. S5f). Because CD9 is present on the cell surface of lymphocytes, we also inoculated Cd9–/– and wt mice i.p. with RML prions. Incubation times after i.p. inoculation were not significantly different.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
The identification of genes that contribute to prion pathogenesis is of paramount importance for understanding prion diseases. Although many PrP-interacting proteins have been identified, only a few have been shown to influence prion replication (Schmitt-Ulms et al., 2004Down; Westergard et al., 2007Down). To prove that a gene contributes to prion pathogenesis, its inactivation, absence or overexpression should affect prion replication as evidenced from experiments in inbred mice and yeast (Carlson et al., 1988Down; Stephenson et al., 2000Down; Wickner et al., 2007Down). We analysed a series of candidate genes with importance in AD, inflammation, cell signalling and other cellular functions for their effect on prion pathogenesis. We modelled disease-onset times after a Weibull regression model that included a gamma-distributed random effect to account for interexperimental variation. Based on our statistical model, only very few, from among 20 candidate genes, moderately but significantly affected prion pathogenesis.

We show that knockout of App protracts the onset of prion disease by 13 %. While the underlying mechanism is unclear, its elucidation is likely to promote our understanding of the neurodegenerative processes in prion disease as well as in AD, both of which share many common features (DeArmond, 1993Down). In AD, cleavage of APP gives rise to pathogenic Aβ peptides that are rich in β-sheet conformation and that can form amyloid plaques in the central nervous system (CNS), similar to PrPSc.

Cytokines and their receptors are key mediators of inflammatory as well as anti-inflammatory responses and are often found to be upregulated in a multitude of neurodegenerative conditions, including trauma, stroke, AD and prion disease. Of six candidate genes that had previously been reported to be upregulated during prion disease, only interruption of IL-1 signalling mildly but significantly prolonged disease-onset times by 16 %. Our results agree with a study reporting prolonged incubation times in Il1r1-knockout mice after i.c. infection with at least approximately 15-fold lower concentrations of mouse-adapted 138A scrapie prions (Schultz et al., 2004Down). The prolonged incubation time probably occurs by delaying astrocytic gliosis, as IL-1R1 is mainly expressed on astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in the CNS and Il1r1–/– mice show reduced inflammatory responses (Brogi et al., 1997Down; Labow et al., 1997Down; Tomozawa et al., 1995Down).

Consistent with other studies, abrogated TNF-{alpha} or TGF-β signalling did not affect prion pathogenesis after i.c. inoculation (Klein et al., 1997Down; Mabbott et al., 2000Down). In Il10–/– mice, we observed a 19 % reduction in the incubation time on a C57BL/6J background, but no change on a 129S1/SvImJ background. Differences in the genetic background of these two inbred mouse strains are likely to explain the different incubation times we observed. While all Il10–/– mice are anaemic, growth retarded and develop chronic enterocolitis to intestinal antigens (Kuhn et al., 1993Down), Il10–/– mice on a C56BL/6J background have less inflammation and fewer adenocarcinomas than mice on a 129Sv background (Berg et al., 1996Down). Our results make it difficult to draw a firm conclusion about the role of IL-10 in prion pathogenesis, but they contrast severely with an earlier report in which a >50 % reduction in incubation time was reported for Il10–/– mice on a 129S1/SvImJ background (Thackray et al., 2004Down).

Prion disease is accompanied by activation and recruitment of microglia to sites of prion replication (Guiroy et al., 1994Down). CCR2 and CCR5 are expressed on microglia and functional in their activation and recruitment through interaction with chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) and CCL5 (Albright et al., 1999Down; El Khoury et al., 2007Down). Although survival times of Ccl2–/– mice infected with ME7 prions were reported to be prolonged (Felton et al., 2005Down), we failed to detect an effect on survival in Ccr2–/– and Ccr5–/– mice infected with RML prions. How ablation of Ccl2 but not Ccr2 can affect survival times in prion disease is unclear, since CCR2 is the only established high-affinity receptor for CCL2 (Charo et al., 1994Down). This disparity may be attributed to infection with different prion strains of different titres or to problematic statistical analysis of survival times in Ccl2–/– mice. It remains to be determined if either CCR2 or CCR5 can compensate for the other's activity in microglial activation and if incubation times would be prolonged in Ccr2Ccr5 double-knockout mice.

Our studies also clearly show that the formation of methionine oxides does not play a critical role in prion pathogenesis. Because certain methionine residues in PrPC can be oxidized, it was suggested that PrPC may protect from oxidative stress (Wong et al., 1999Down). Disabling the Msr system, which reverts methionine sulfoxide to methionine, increases sensitivity to oxidative stress, resulting in reduced life span, elevated levels of hippocampal neurodegeneration, Aβ deposition and tau phosphorylation (Pal et al., 2007Down). MsrA-knockout mice without a functional Msr system (Moskovitz & Stadtman, 2003Down) showed incubation times similar to those in controls.

Furthermore, our studies show that the production of free radicals may affect the progression of disease in a strain-dependent fashion. PrPC has been controversially discussed to have SOD activity and that loss of this putative function by its conversion to PrPSc may contribute to prion disease (Hutter et al., 2003Down; Wong et al., 1999Down). While disabling the Msr system did not affect prion pathogenesis, Tg(SOD)3Cje mice overexpressing human SOD1 showed prolonged incubation times when inoculated with RML prions, but not when injected with 301V prions. In contrast to RML prions, the 301V strain replicates very slowly in mice expressing mouse PrP-A, and PrPSc deposits accumulate only relatively late during pathogenesis. This may cause less immediate inflammation and thus less free radical production (Farquhar et al., 1996Down). A protective effect of increased SOD activity may be visible only with a fast-replicating strain, such as RML prions in which PrPSc deposits, inflammation and free-radical production appear relatively early after infection.

While CD9 ablation did not affect incubation times, we cannot exclude that CD81, which shares approximately 65 % sequence similarity with CD9, can compensate for the PrP-related functions in Cd9–/– mice. In this case, a Cd9Cd81 double-knockout mouse might provide some insight into the role of CD9 and/or CD81 during PrP conversion. While tetraspanins such as CD9 are known for their exceptional ability to associate with other surface proteins, no association of CD9 with PrP could be observed (E. Rubinstein, unpublished data).

In conclusion, our studies underscore the importance of screening genes that may contribute to prion pathogenesis in in vivo models to establish their function in PrP conversion and pathogenesis. While all candidate genes tested here were implicated to have a role in prion pathogenesis in previous studies, only three were shown to affect disease-onset times. We note that many factors influence these findings, such as the genetic background of the animal model, the prion strain, inoculum titres, the route of infection and, importantly, the statistical analysis of incubation times. By using appropriate controls and a rigorous statistical analysis that takes interexperimental variation into account, we were able to rule out many candidate genes, which otherwise would have scored as ‘significant’ based on the logrank test alone. Clearly, the conversion of PrPC to PrPSc involves a complex pathway, the elucidation of which would benefit treatment of these devastating diseases.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
G. T. was supported through a fellowship by the Larry L. Hillblom Foundation. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (AG02132, AG10770 and AG021601) as well as by a gift from the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation. The authors thank the staff of the Hunters Point animal facility for support with the transgenic animal experiments and Hang Nguyen for editorial assistance. We also thank Juanito Meneses and Dr Roger Pedersen for help with ES cell work, Gerassimos Pagoulatos for providing Tg(HSP70) mice, Nobuhiko Kojima for Tg(Fyn) mice and Sangram Sisodia for App–/– and Aplp2–/– mice.


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Albright, A. V., Shieh, J. T., Itoh, T., Lee, B., Pleasure, D., O'Connor, M. J., Doms, R. W. & Gonzalez-Scarano, F. (1999). Microglia express CCR5, CXCR4, and CCR3, but of these, CCR5 is the principal coreceptor for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 dementia isolates. J Virol 73, 205–213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Baker, C. A., Lu, Z. Y., Zaitsev, I. & Manuelidis, L. (1999). Microglial activation varies in different models of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J Virol 73, 5089–5097.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Behrens, A., Genoud, N., Naumann, H., Rülicke, T., Janett, F., Heppner, F. L., Ledermann, B. & Aguzzi, A. (2002). Absence of the prion protein homologue Doppel causes male sterility. EMBO J 21, 3652–3658.[CrossRef][Medline]

Berg, D. J., Davidson, N., Kuhn, R., Muller, W., Menon, S., Holland, G., Thompson-Snipes, L., Leach, M. W. & Rennick, D. (1996). Enterocolitis and colon cancer in interleukin-10-deficient mice are associated with aberrant cytokine production and CD4+ TH1-like responses. J Clin Invest 98, 1010–1020.[Medline]

Brogi, A., Strazza, M., Melli, M. & Costantino-Ceccarini, E. (1997). Induction of intracellular ceramide by interleukin-1β in oligodendrocytes. J Cell Biochem 66, 532–541.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bruce, M., Chree, A., McConnell, I., Foster, J., Pearson, G. & Fraser, H. (1994). Transmission of bovine spongiform encephalopathy and scrapie to mice: strain variation and the species barrier. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 343, 405–411.[Medline]

Campbell, I. L., Eddleston, M., Kemper, P., Oldstone, M. B. & Hobbs, M. V. (1994). Activation of cerebral cytokine gene expression and its correlation with onset of reactive astrocyte and acute-phase response gene expression in scrapie. J Virol 68, 2383–2387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Carlson, G. A., Kingsbury, D. T., Goodman, P. A., Coleman, S., Marshall, S. T., DeArmond, S., Westaway, D. & Prusiner, S. B. (1986). Linkage of prion protein and scrapie incubation time genes. Cell 46, 503–511.[CrossRef][Medline]

Carlson, G. A., Goodman, P. A., Lovett, M., Taylor, B. A., Marshall, S. T., Peterson-Torchia, M., Westaway, D. & Prusiner, S. B. (1988). Genetics and polymorphism of the mouse prion gene complex: control of scrapie incubation time. Mol Cell Biol 8, 5528–5540.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chandler, R. L. (1961). Encephalopathy in mice produced by inoculation with scrapie brain material. Lancet 1, 1378–1379.[Medline]

Charo, I. F., Myers, S. J., Herman, A., Franci, C., Connolly, A. J. & Coughlin, S. R. (1994). Molecular cloning and functional expression of two monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 receptors reveals alternative splicing of the carboxyl-terminal tails. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91, 2752–2756.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cox, D. R. & Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of Survival Data, p. 208. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

DeArmond, S. J. (1993). Alzheimer's disease and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: overlap of pathogenic mechanisms. Curr Opin Neurol 6, 872–881.[Medline]

Dickinson, A. G. & Meikle, V. M. (1969). A comparison of some biological characteristics of the mouse-passaged scrapie agents, 22A and ME7. Genet Res 13, 213–225.[Medline]

Doh-ura, K., Mekada, E., Ogomori, K. & Iwaki, T. (2000). Enhanced CD9 expression in the mouse and human brains infected with transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 59, 774–785.[Medline]

El Khoury, J., Toft, M., Hickman, S. E., Means, T. K., Terada, K., Geula, C. & Luster, A. D. (2007). Ccr2 deficiency impairs microglial accumulation and accelerates progression of Alzheimer-like disease. Nat Med 13, 432–438.[CrossRef][Medline]

Epstein, C. J., Avraham, K. B., Lovett, M., Smith, S., Elroy-Stein, O., Rotman, G., Bry, C. & Groner, Y. (1987). Transgenic mice with increased Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase activity: animal model of dosage effects in Down syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84, 8044–8048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Farquhar, C. F., Dornan, J., Moore, R. C., Somerville, R. A., Tunstall, A. M. & Hope, J. (1996). Protease-resistant PrP deposition in brain and non-central nervous system tissues of a murine model of bovine spongiform encephalopathy. J Gen Virol 77, 1941–1946.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Farrer, L. A., Cupples, L. A., Haines, J. L., Hyman, B., Kukull, W. A., Mayeux, R., Myers, R. H., Pericak-Vance, M. A., Risch, N. & van Duijn, C. M. (1997). Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. JAMA 278, 1349–1356.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Felton, L. M., Cunningham, C., Rankine, E. L., Waters, S., Boche, D. & Perry, V. H. (2005). MCP-1 and murine prion disease: separation of early behavioural dysfunction from overt clinical disease. Neurobiol Dis 20, 283–295.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fiala, M., Liu, P. T., Espinosa-Jeffrey, A., Rosenthal, M. J., Bernard, G., Ringman, J. M., Sayre, J., Zhang, L., Zaghi, J. & other authors (2007). Innate immunity and transcription of MGAT-III and Toll-like receptors in Alzheimer's disease patients are improved by bisdemethoxycurcumin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104, 12849–12854.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Glidden, D. V. & Vittinghoff, E. (2004). Modelling clustered survival data from multicentre clinical trials. Stat Med 23, 369–388.[CrossRef][Medline]

Grant, S. G., O'Dell, T. J., Karl, K. A., Stein, P. L., Soriano, P. & Kandel, E. R. (1992). Impaired long-term potentiation, spatial learning, and hippocampal development in fyn mutant mice. Science 258, 1903–1910.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guiroy, D. C., Wakayama, I., Liberski, P. P. & Gajdusek, D. C. (1994). Relationship of microglia and scrapie amyloid-immunoreactive plaques in kuru, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and Gerstmann-Straussler syndrome. Acta Neuropathol 87, 526–530.[Medline]

Hsiao, K. K., Borchelt, D. R., Olson, K., Johannsdottir, R., Kitt, C., Yunis, W., Xu, S., Eckman, C., Younkin, S. & other authors (1995). Age-related CNS disorder and early death in transgenic FVB/N mice overexpressing Alzheimer amyloid precursor proteins. Neuron 15, 1203–1218.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hutter, G., Heppner, F. L. & Aguzzi, A. (2003). No superoxide dismutase activity of cellular prion protein in vivo. Biol Chem 384, 1279–1285.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kaplan, E. L. & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53, 457–481.[CrossRef]

Kenward, N., Hope, J., Landon, M. & Mayer, R. J. (1994). Expression of polyubiquitin and heat-shock protein 70 genes increases in the later stages of disease progression in scrapie-infected mouse brain. J Neurochem 62, 1870–1877.[Medline]

Klein, M. A., Frigg, R., Flechsig, E., Raeber, A. J., Kalinke, U., Bluethmann, H., Bootz, F., Suter, M., Zinkernagel, R. M. & Aguzzi, A. (1997). A crucial role for B cells in neuroinvasive scrapie. Nature 390, 687–691.[Medline]

Kojima, N., Wang, J., Mansuy, I. M., Grant, S. G., Mayford, M. & Kandel, E. R. (1997). Rescuing impairment of long-term potentiation in fyn-deficient mice by introducing Fyn transgene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94, 4761–4765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kovacs, G. G., Kurucz, I., Budka, H., Adori, C., Muller, F., Acs, P., Kloppel, S., Schatzl, H. M., Mayer, R. J. & Laszlo, L. (2001). Prominent stress response of Purkinje cells in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurobiol Dis 8, 881–889.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kuhn, R., Lohler, J., Rennick, D., Rajewsky, K. & Muller, W. (1993). Interleukin-10-deficient mice develop chronic enterocolitis. Cell 75, 263–274.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kuziel, W. A., Morgan, S. J., Dawson, T. C., Griffin, S., Smithies, O., Ley, K. & Maeda, N. (1997). Severe reduction in leukocyte adhesion and monocyte extravasation in mice deficient in CC chemokine receptor 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94, 12053–12058.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kuziel, W. A., Dawson, T. C., Quinones, M., Garavito, E., Chenaux, G., Ahuja, S. S., Reddick, R. L. & Maeda, N. (2003). CCR5 deficiency is not protective in the early stages of atherogenesis in apoE knockout mice. Atherosclerosis 167, 25–32.[CrossRef][Medline]

Labow, M., Shuster, D., Zetterstrom, M., Nunes, P., Terry, R., Cullinan, E. B., Bartfai, T., Solorzano, C., Moldawer, L. L. & other authors (1997). Absence of IL-1 signaling and reduced inflammatory response in IL-1 type I receptor-deficient mice. J Immunol 159, 2452–2461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Le Naour, F., Rubinstein, E., Jasmin, C., Prenant, M. & Boucheix, C. (2000). Severely reduced female fertility in CD9-deficient mice. Science 287, 319–321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee, H. P., Jun, Y. C., Choi, J. K., Kim, J. I., Carp, R. I. & Kim, Y. S. (2005). The expression of RANTES and chemokine receptors in the brains of scrapie-infected mice. J Neuroimmunol 158, 26–33.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mabbott, N. A., Williams, A., Farquhar, C. F., Pasparakis, M., Kollias, G. & Bruce, M. E. (2000). Tumor necrosis factor alpha-deficient, but not interleukin-6-deficient, mice resist peripheral infection with scrapie. J Virol 74, 3338–3344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Marella, M. & Chabry, J. (2004). Neurons and astrocytes respond to prion infection by inducing microglia recruitment. J Neurosci 24, 620–627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moore, R. C., Lee, I. Y., Silverman, G. L., Harrison, P. M., Strome, R., Heinrich, C., Karunaratne, A., Pasternak, S. H., Chishti, M. A. & other authors (1999). Ataxia in prion protein (PrP)-deficient mice is associated with upregulation of the novel PrP-like protein doppel. J Mol Biol 292, 797–817.[CrossRef][Medline]

Moskovitz, J. & Stadtman, E. R. (2003). Selenium-deficient diet enhances protein oxidation and affects methionine sulfoxide reductase (MsrB) protein level in certain mouse tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 7486–7490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moskovitz, J., Bar-Noy, S., Williams, W. M., Requena, J., Berlett, B. S. & Stadtman, E. R. (2001). Methionine sulfoxide reductase (MsrA) is a regulator of antioxidant defense and lifespan in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 12920–12925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mouillet-Richard, S., Mutel, V., Loric, S., Tournois, C., Launay, J.-M. & Kellermann, O. (2000). Regulation by neurotransmitter receptors of serotonergic or catecholaminergic neuronal cell differentiation. J Biol Chem 275, 9186–9192.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nielsen, G. G., Gill, R. D., Andersen, P. K. & Sørensen, T. I. A. (1992). A counting process approach to maximum likelihood estimation in frailty models. Scand J Stat 19, 25–43.

Pal, R., Oien, D. B., Ersen, F. Y. & Moskovitz, J. (2007). Elevated levels of brain-pathologies associated with neurodegenerative diseases in the methionine sulfoxide reductase A knockout mouse. Exp Brain Res 180, 765–774.[CrossRef][Medline]

Petrone, A., Battaglia, F., Wang, C., Dusa, A., Su, J., Zagzag, D., Bianchi, R., Casaccia-Bonnefil, P., Arancio, O. & Sap, J. (2003). Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase alpha is essential for hippocampal neuronal migration and long-term potentiation. EMBO J 22, 4121–4131.[CrossRef][Medline]

Plumier, J. C., Ross, B. M., Currie, R. W., Angelidis, C. E., Kazlaris, H., Kollias, G. & Pagoulatos, G. N. (1995). Transgenic mice expressing the human heat shock protein 70 have improved post-ischemic myocardial recovery. J Clin Invest 95, 1854–1860.[Medline]

Prusiner, S. B. (2007). Prions. In Fields Virology, 5th edn, pp. 3059–3092. Edited by D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, D. E. Griffin, R. A. Lamb, M. A. Martin, B. Roizman & S. E. Straus. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Prusiner, S. B., Scott, M., Foster, D., Pan, K.-M., Groth, D., Mirenda, C., Torchia, M., Yang, S.-L., Serban, D. & other authors (1990). Transgenetic studies implicate interactions between homologous PrP isoforms in scrapie prion replication. Cell 63, 673–686.[CrossRef][Medline]

Prusiner, S. B., Groth, D., Serban, A., Koehler, R., Foster, D., Torchia, M., Burton, D., Yang, S.-L. & DeArmond, S. J. (1993). Ablation of the prion protein (PrP) gene in mice prevents scrapie and facilitates production of anti-PrP antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90, 10608–10612.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Raber, J., Wong, D., Buttini, M., Orth, M., Bellosta, S., Pitas, R. E., Mahley, R. W. & Mucke, L. (1998). Isoform-specific effects of human apolipoprotein E on brain function revealed in ApoE knockout mice: increased susceptibility of females. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 10914–10919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rudd, P. M., Endo, T., Colominas, C., Groth, D., Wheeler, S. F., Harvey, D. J., Wormald, M. R., Serban, H., Prusiner, S. B. & other authors (1999). Glycosylation differences between the normal and pathogenic prion protein isoforms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96, 13044–13049.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Safar, J. G., Kellings, K., Serban, A., Groth, D., Cleaver, J. E., Prusiner, S. B. & Riesner, D. (2005). Search for a prion-specific nucleic acid. J Virol 79, 10796–10806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Santuccione, A., Sytnyk, V., Leshchyns'ka, I. & Schachner, M. (2005). Prion protein recruits its neuronal receptor NCAM to lipid rafts to activate p59fyn and to enhance neurite outgrowth. J Cell Biol 169, 341–354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schmitt-Ulms, G., Hansen, K., Liu, J., Cowdrey, C., Yang, J., DeArmond, S. J., Cohen, F. E., Prusiner, S. B. & Baldwin, M. A. (2004). Time-controlled transcardiac perfusion cross-linking for the study of protein interactions in complex tissues. Nat Biotechnol 22, 724–731.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schultz, J., Schwarz, A., Neidhold, S., Burwinkel, M., Riemer, C., Simon, D., Kopf, M., Otto, M. & Baier, M. (2004). Role of interleukin-1 in prion disease-associated astrocyte activation. Am J Pathol 165, 671–678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sharief, M. K., Green, A., Dick, J. P., Gawler, J. & Thompson, E. J. (1999). Heightened intrathecal release of proinflammatory cytokines in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurology 52, 1289–1291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shull, M. M., Ormsby, I., Kier, A. B., Pawlowski, S., Diebold, R. J., Yin, M., Allen, R., Sidman, C., Proetzel, G. & other authors (1992). Targeted disruption of the mouse transforming growth factor-β 1 gene results in multifocal inflammatory disease. Nature 359, 693–699.[CrossRef][Medline]

Stephenson, D. A., Chiotti, K., Ebeling, C., Groth, D., DeArmond, S. J., Prusiner, S. B. & Carlson, G. A. (2000). Quantitative trait loci affecting prion incubation time in mice. Genomics 69, 47–53.[CrossRef][Medline]

Stoeck, K., Bodemer, M., Ciesielczyk, B., Meissner, B., Bartl, M., Heinemann, U. & Zerr, I. (2005). Interleukin 4 and interleukin 10 levels are elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Arch Neurol 62, 1591–1594.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tatzelt, J., Maeda, N., Pekny, M., Yang, S.-L., Betsholtz, C., Eliasson, C., Cayetano, J., Camerino, A. P., DeArmond, S. J. & Prusiner, S. B. (1996). Scrapie in mice deficient in apolipoprotein E or glial fibrillary acidic protein. Neurology 47, 449–453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tesseur, I., Zou, K., Esposito, L., Bard, F., Berber, E., Can, J. V., Lin, A. H., Crews, L., Tremblay, P. & other authors (2006). Deficiency in neuronal TGF-β signaling promotes neurodegeneration and Alzheimer's pathology. J Clin Invest 116, 3060–3069.[CrossRef][Medline]

Thackray, A. M., McKenzie, A. N., Klein, M. A., Lauder, A. & Bujdoso, R. (2004). Accelerated prion disease in the absence of interleukin-10. J Virol 78, 13697–13707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tomozawa, Y., Inoue, T. & Satoh, M. (1995). Expression of type I interleukin-1 receptor mRNA and its regulation in cultured astrocytes. Neurosci Lett 195, 57–60.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vittinghoff, E., Glidden, D. V., Shiboski, S. C. & McCulloch, C. E. (2005). Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models. In Statistics for Biology and Health. Edited by M. Gail, K. Krickeberg, J. Samet, A. Tsiatis & W. Wong. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

von Koch, C. S., Zheng, H., Chen, H., Trumbauer, M., Thinakaran, G., van der Ploeg, L. H., Price, D. L. & Sisodia, S. S. (1997). Generation of APLP2 KO mice and early postnatal lethality in APLP2/APP double KO mice. Neurobiol Aging 18, 661–669.[CrossRef][Medline]

Westergard, L., Christensen, H. M. & Harris, D. A. (2007). The cellular prion protein (PrPC): Its physiological function and role in disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1772, 629–644.[Medline]

Wickner, R. B., Edskes, H. K., Shewmaker, F. & Nakayashiki, T. (2007). Prions of fungi: inherited structures and biological roles. Nat Rev Microbiol 5, 611–618.[CrossRef][Medline]

Williams, T. M., Cheung, M. W., Park, D. S., Razani, B., Cohen, A. W., Muller, W. J., Di Vizio, D., Chopra, N. G., Pestell, R. G. & Lisanti, M. P. (2003). Loss of caveolin-1 gene expression accelerates the development of dysplastic mammary lesions in tumor-prone transgenic mice. Mol Biol Cell 14, 1027–1042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wong, B. S., Wang, H., Brown, D. R. & Jones, I. M. (1999). Selective oxidation of methionine residues in prion proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 259, 352–355.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wyss-Coray, T., Feng, L., Masliah, E., Ruppe, M. D., Lee, H. S., Toggas, S. M., Rockenstein, E. M. & Mucke, L. (1995). Increased central nervous system production of extracellular matrix components and development of hydrocephalus in transgenic mice overexpressing transforming growth factor-beta 1. Am J Pathol 147, 53–67.[Abstract]

Yang, X., Bhaumik, M., Bhattacharyya, R., Gong, S., Rogler, C. E. & Stanley, P. (2000). New evidence for an extra-hepatic role of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III in the progression of diethylnitrosamine-induced liver tumors in mice. Cancer Res 60, 3313–3319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zheng, H., Jiang, M., Trumbauer, M. E., Sirinathsinghji, D. J. S., Hopkins, R., Smith, D. W., Heavens, R. P., Dawson, G. R., Boyce, S. & other authors (1995). β-amyloid precursor protein-deficient mice show reactive gliosis and decreased locomotor ability. Cell 81, 525–531.[CrossRef][Medline]

Received 11 February 2008; accepted 13 March 2008.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Tamguney, K. P. Francis, K. Giles, A. Lemus, S. J. DeArmond, and S. B. Prusiner
Measuring prions by bioluminescence imaging
PNAS, September 1, 2009; 106(35): 15002 - 15006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
F. Guillerme-Bosselut, L. Forestier, C. Jayat-Vignoles, J.-L. Vilotte, I. Popa, J. Portoukalian, A. Le Dur, H. Laude, R. Julien, and P.-F. Gallet
Glycosylation-related gene expression profiling in the brain and spleen of scrapie-affected mouse
Glycobiology, August 1, 2009; 19(8): 879 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tamgüney, G.
Right arrow Articles by Prusiner, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tamgüney, G.
Right arrow Articles by Prusiner, S. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tamgüney, G.
Right arrow Articles by Prusiner, S. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS