|
|
||||||||
1 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Division of Rheumatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
2 Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
Correspondence
Wayne M. Yokoyama
yokoyama{at}im.wustl.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Published online ahead of print on 23 October 2008 as DOI 10.1099/vir.0.2008/006668-0.
Supplementary figures are available with the online version of this paper.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Additionally, despite the ubiquitous use of the i.p. route of infection, the mechanism by which this causes systemic infection has not been well studied. It is unclear whether inoculation of MCMV into the peritoneal cavity leads to infection of peritoneal cells, or whether virions traffic from the peritoneal cavity to initially infect cells elsewhere. Stoddart et al. (1994)
suggested that mononuclear phagocytes in the peripheral blood disseminate MCMV after i.p. infection, and that these infected cells are then found in infected organs. However, the trafficking mechanism from the peritoneal cavity was not described and infected mononuclear cells were observed 5 days p.i., after the peak of acute infection. Thus, further elucidation of MCMV trafficking at earlier time points is warranted for understanding the progression of early MCMV infection.
Here, we use a recombinant MCMV that expresses enhanced GFP (MCMV–GFP) under an intermediate-early promoter to visualize the time course of infection as early as 6 h p.i. We show that MCMV injected into the peritoneal cavity appears to traffic as free virus to infect specific cells in the lymph nodes (LNs), spleen and liver within the first hours after infection. These studies were aided by use of inert beads that fluoresce in the near-infrared (NIR) range, which allowed us to visualize the trafficking pattern from the peritoneal cavity. Thus, MCMV displays specificity within the first day of infection, before dissemination to other organs and cell types as the infection progresses.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
203–GFP was created in our laboratory and propagated in Vero cells in vitro, then purified using a sucrose cushion as described by Byun et al. (2007)
203–GFP is a deletion virus, its only known difference from the wild-type virus is a partial decrease of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I downregulation in infected cells. As we were mostly interested in the cells that were initially infected by CPXV, this deletion should not affect our results. Mice were infected with 5.5x106 p.f.u. by i.p. injection.
NIR fluorescent microbeads.
Carboxyl fluorescent Aqua Green particles were purchased (Spherotech) in 0.3, 1 and 5 µm sizes. Maximum excitation and emission for these beads are 775 and 789 nm, respectively. Beads were treated with 0.05 M NaOH for approximately 1 day to remove any endotoxins and resuspended in sterile water. Beads were confirmed to be endotoxin-free by the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) test (Associates of Cape Cod). Prior to use, beads were adsorbed overnight with 10 % mouse serum prepared from C57BL/6 mice. To separate aggregates, beads were vortexed and sonicated thoroughly before use. Approximately 8x107 5 µm beads were injected per mouse, as counted by haemocytometer. The smaller beads could not be counted directly, but we estimated approximately 108 1 µm and 109 0.3 µm beads were injected per mouse.
In vivo imaging.
To facilitate imaging, hair was removed from the ventral side of mice prior to injection by using Sally Hansen Brush-On Hair Remover (Del Laboratories). Mice were anaesthetized and maintained with inhaled isoflurane (2 %, v/v) for in vivo imaging. Images from the mice were captured using the Kodak IS4000MM multimodal imaging system (Eastman Kodak Company) at various time points between 30 min and 4 days after injection of fluorescent beads. Fluorescence images were acquired by 60 s exposure using excitation and emission collection centred at 755 and 830 nm, respectively. Digital X-ray images were subsequently acquired for anatomical orientation of the NIR images (Backer et al., 2007
). Images were analysed with Kodak Molecular Imaging Software (Eastman Kodak Company).
Immunofluorescence.
Spleens, livers and LNs were harvested from mice and fixed overnight in PLP fixative (0.05 M lysine phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 0.05 % glutaraldehyde, 0.002 mg NaIO4 ml–1, 0.5 % paraformaldehyde) with 0.1 % Triton X-100. Tissues were then dehydrated in 30 % sucrose for approximately 1 day and frozen in Tissue-Tek (Sakura Finetek) using cooled 2-methylbutane over dry ice and stored at –80 °C. Cryostat sections were cut 9 µm thick and rehydrated in PBS. Sections were blocked with 10 % normal goat serum in 0.5 % Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 h. Sections were then incubated with the primary antibody for 2 h, washed with 0.5 % Triton X-100/PBS, and incubated with the secondary antibody for 1 h. Primary antibodies used included anti-GFP (Abcam), anti-MADCAM-1 (BD Pharmingen), anti-CD169 (AbD Serotec), anti-CD29 (BD Pharmingen) and anti-ER-TR7 (Abcam). Secondary antibodies used included Alexa Fluor 660-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG and Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG, both from Molecular Probes. Directly conjugated antibodies were incubated on tissues for 1 h after blocking. F4/80-phycoerythrin (PE), CD11c-PE, CD3e-allophycocyanin and CD11b-PE were obtained from eBioscience; B220-PE, NK1.1-PE and MADCAM-PE were obtained from BD Pharmingen; MARCO-PE was obtained from AbD Serotec; CD146-PE was obtained from Chemicon International. Images were acquired using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope and processed using MetaMorph (Molecular Devices).
Quantification of the percentage of infected cells co-localizing with a particular marker was performed by an experimenter blinded to the identity of the marker. Infected cells from several different sections and locations were analysed at x60, and approximately 150 GFP+-infected cells were counted and among those, the number of cells with a given marker was determined.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
MCMV directly infects spleen and liver cells as free virus
The early infection of MZ cells in the spleen suggested haematogenous spread of the virus, either as virus-infected cells or as free virus, because blood passes from the splenic arterioles through the MZ into the red pulp. To determine whether injection of virus directly into the bloodstream would result in a similar pattern of infection, we infected mice with MCMV–GFP intravenously (i.v.) via tail vein injection. The distribution and pattern of infection were essentially identical – the spleen and liver were infected early, with cells infected in the MZ and red pulp of the spleen (Fig. 2
) and infected hepatocytes in the liver (Supplementary Fig. S1). Infected cells had similar morphologies regardless of the route of infection. Moreover, the infected cells in both i.p. and i.v. inoculations expressed the same cell surface markers by immunohistochemistry (data not shown) as discussed below. Thus, MCMV appears to spread via haematogenous route upon i.p. inoculation.
|
MCMV follows the normal trafficking mechanism from the peritoneal cavity to mediastinal LNs
To explore the possibility that free virus was trafficking from the peritoneal cavity to directly infect resident spleen and liver cells following an i.p. injection, we first mapped out the default trafficking pathway using inert beads. Beads fluorescing in the NIR range were injected i.p. in varying sizes (0.3, 1 and 5 µm) and whole mouse in vivo imaging was used to detect bead movement. The 0.3 µm beads approximated the size of an MCMV virion, while 5 µm beads were closer to the size of a small leukocyte (Shellam et al., 2006
; Junqueira et al., 1998
). After 2 h, 0.3 and 1 µm beads were detected in the mediastinum and remained there until the mice were sacrificed, at most, 4 days after the initial injection (Fig. 3a
). In contrast, the 5 µm beads never appeared in the mediastinum, even after 4 days. Thus, beads smaller than 5 µm were capable of trafficking to the mediastinum, while 5 µm beads were not, consistent with the possibility that free virus could directly traffic from the peritoneal cavity to the spleen.
|
To compare the trafficking of inert beads to MCMV, we injected mice with MCMV–GFP i.p. and sampled mediastinal and abdominal LNs as before (Fig. 3d
). The distribution of GFP+ cells was similar to that of the smaller beads (0.3 and 1 µm). Infected cells were found in the lymphatics of the diaphragm and in the mediastinal LNs, with few GFP+ cells in the abdominal LNs. These data suggest that free MCMV virions traffic from the peritoneal cavity into the mediastinal LNs and then into the thoracic duct, thereby accessing the bloodstream to eventually infect the spleen and liver.
Early preferential MCMV infection of subcapsular sinus macrophages in mediastinal LNs
Sectioning of LNs 8 h after injection showed peripheral accumulation of beads, suggesting that most of the lymph is not filtered through the parenchyma of the LN, but instead preferentially flows around the parenchyma through the subcapsular sinus (Fig. 4a
). The same pattern was observed in the MCMV–GFP-infected LNs, suggesting that the virus was being carried in the lymph, and that it also inefficiently penetrates into the parenchyma (Fig. 4b
). Furthermore, approximately 80 % of MCMV–GFP-infected cells in the subcapsular sinus were CD169+, suggesting that they were macrophages (Fig. 4c
). Infected cells were often next to, but did not co-localize with, Lyve-1+ lymphatic endothelial cells of the subcapsular sinus (data not shown). These data strongly suggest that subcapsular sinus macrophages are selectively infected early in the LNs.
|
|
|
|
Cowpox virus (CPXV) produces a distinct pattern of infection
To determine whether the pattern of infection seen with MCMV–GFP was due to selectivity of anatomical structures or specific to the virus, we infected C57BL/6 mice with CPXV for comparison. Like MCMV, CPXV is also a large DNA virus of approximately the same size as MCMV, is endemic in natural rodent reservoirs, and is also known to have a wide tissue tropism (Buller & Palumbo, 1991
). However, the pattern of CPXV infection was distinct from MCMV infection in both the spleen and liver. In the spleen, infected cells were also found around the MZ, but extended into the white pulp instead of the red pulp (Fig. 8
). Many of the infected cells were found inside of the ER-TR7 staining. A proportion of these cells co-localized with the MZ metallophilic macrophage marker CD169, and a proportion co-localized with the MZ macrophage marker MARCO, suggesting that several macrophage populations have been infected. In the liver, infected cells had a dendritic morphology and co-localized with the macrophage marker F4/80, suggesting that these were Kupffer cells (Supplementary Fig. S3a available in JGV Online). Thus, CPXV appears to have a specificity for macrophages in the spleen and liver in a manner that is distinct from MCMV.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MCMV can infect many different organs, and, in vitro, many different cell lines (Jordan & Takagi, 1983
; Shellam et al., 2006
; Krmpotic et al., 2003
). Despite this broad tropism and its dissemination as free-viral particles, MCMV displayed a selective infection within the first hours after infection. Following i.p. inoculation, MCMV virions infected subcapsular sinus macrophages in the mediastinal LNs. Haematogenous spread of the virus resulted in infection of stromal cells in the spleen, particularly reticular fibroblasts, beginning in the MZ at 6 h p.i. and spreading into the red pulp. Hepatocytes were targeted in the liver, but we did not see infected cells elsewhere. MCMV–host interactions appear to be different in the LNs and the spleen, as MCMV-infected cells in the LNs were CD169+ macrophages, and this population was not initially infected in the spleen. Thus, selected cell populations were infected in selective sites after MCMV infection, raising the possibility that MCMV is handled in an organ-specific manner.
Recent studies have suggested that subcapsular sinus CD169+ macrophages can capture fluorescently labelled vesicular stomatitis virus, vaccinia virus and adenovirus in the draining popliteal LN after footpad injection (Junt et al., 2007
). While we add MCMV and CPXV to this list, our study differs in four major aspects: (i) we show productive infection of subcapsular sinus macrophages by MCMV and CPXV, as evidenced by GFP expression under the control of a viral promoter. (ii) We show infection of these cells in the mediastinal LNs after i.p. injection. (iii) Within a few hours after injection, we visualized productive infection of only a few medullary cells, whereas labelled viruses were readily seen in the medulla. (iv) We infected mice with sublethal doses of MCMV and CPXV, while labelled viruses were injected in quantities 1–2 logs above the standard p.f.u. required. Nevertheless, these studies when taken together suggest that subcapsular sinus macrophages have a generic host mechanism for pathogen capture that is not specific to the virus. As lymph appears to flow preferentially through the subcapsular sinus, sentinel cells in that location would then be advantageous for the early detection of a pathogen and initiation of an immune response. Moreover, subcapsular sinus macrophages can also bind both antigen and immune complexes (Carrasco & Batista, 2007
; Phan et al., 2007
), suggesting that they possess mechanisms to sample the lymph broadly.
Although early capture of fluorescently labelled viral particles by subcapsular sinus macrophages can lead to B-cell stimulation (Junt et al., 2007
), the role of the initially infected cells in the spleen in the progression or suppression of infection is largely unknown. The selective infection of non-immune cells in the spleen opens up the possibility that epithelial and stromal cells, although themselves not classic effector cells in the immune system, may play important roles in alerting the immune system to viral infection. In particular, reticular fibroblasts closely interdigitate with leukocytes in the red pulp, and would be in an ideal position to signal neighbouring immune cells to infection. Consistent with this possibility, stromal cells in the spleen may be the initial producers of the type I interferons after MCMV infection (Schneider et al., 2008
), which are known to have a role in limiting early MCMV replication (Orange & Biron, 1996
). Moreover, while this manuscript was being prepared, endothelial cells were shown to be the apparent source of virions for secondary viraemic spread (Sacher et al., 2008
). Although we found that most infected cells in the spleen were initially reticular fibroblasts, there was also a population of infected MADCAM-1+ sinus-lining cells, consistent with this observation. In either case, here we show directly the initial cells infected with MCMV after systemic administration.
As NK cells are known to be important in controlling early MCMV infection (Brown et al., 2001
), this then leads to the question of whether the initially infected cells in the LNs or alternatively the selectively infected cells in the spleen or the liver may be the direct targets of NK cells. Interestingly, however, the particular strain of MCMV–GFP we used here had a point mutation in the m157 open reading frame (data not shown). m157 is a ligand for the activation receptor Ly49H involved in the genetic control of MCMV infection within the first 3 days (Smith et al., 2002
; Arase et al., 2002
). Although C57BL/6 mice are genetically resistant to MCMV because they have Ly49h (Cmv1r) and most other laboratory strains of mice lack Ly49h and are thus genetically susceptible (Scalzo et al., 1990
; Lee et al., 2001
; Daniels et al., 2001
), our experiments here with C57BL/6 mice may be more similar to that of genetically susceptible strains of mice than resistant strains.
The initial interactions between MCMV and host progresses from infection of the selective cell types to a more widespread infection that is observed several days after infection. Previous in vivo studies detailing acute MCMV infection have observed both disruption of splenic architecture and a variety of cell types that are initially infected in the spleen, but these studies were conducted 2–3 days p.i. (Benedict et al., 2006
; Mercer et al., 1988
; Stoddart et al., 1994
). This appears to be too late to observe the actual initially infected cells, as our studies indicate that by 48 h, the homeostasis of the host has been dramatically changed by the virus and host response, and it is likely that at least one cycle of lytic viral replication has occurred by this point. In the stromal population, infected cells were found from the MZ to the red pulp within 24 h, leading to disruption and degeneration of these areas by 48 h. We found ER-TR7 to be a good marker for infected cells only in the first hours after infection. It is possible that infected cells have downregulated ER-TR7 or undergone apoptosis at later time points, leading to a decreased signal at 2–3 days p.i. The leukocyte population in the spleen was not initially infected by MCMV; however, the infection evolved by 48 h p.i. In particular, DCs are thought to be efficiently infected in early acute MCMV infection (Andoniou et al., 2005
; Andrews et al., 2001
), but our experiments showed that infected CD11c+ DCs appear relatively late, at 48 h, mostly in the white pulp of the spleen. It is possible that DCs were infected elsewhere, and traffic to the white pulp within 48 h. However, we have not noted infected DCs in any other organs that we examined within the first day of infection (data not shown), and our results suggest that the vast majority of infected cells in the spleen were stromal cells, not DCs. Alternatively, it is possible that the GFP+ DCs had simply engulfed other infected cells, without becoming productively infected. In any case, GFP+ DCs were not noticeable in the infection until 48 h p.i., after the infection of other cells. Additionally, movement of lymphocytes, macrophages, and NK cells at 48 h p.i. suggests that by this time, these cells have been alerted to the infection and were involved in the host response.
Finally, we showed that CPXV infected subcapsular sinus macrophages in the LNs similar to MCMV. Inasmuch as salivary gland MCMV and sucrose cushion-purified CPXV initially infected the same cell in the proximal draining LN, it is unlikely that the salivary gland preparation itself affected initial MCMV localization. CPXV also infected cells in the MZ of the spleen, suggesting similar haematogenous spread as in MCMV. However, cells infected in the spleen and liver by CPXV were macrophages that were morphologically different from MCMV-infected cells, and the spread of infection in the spleen was into the white pulp instead of the red pulp. Like MCMV, CPXV is also known to infect many different cell types (Buller & Palumbo, 1991
), but this does not appear to be the case early in infection. Thus, our data suggest differences in the initial host response to these two viruses, as a result of selective early infection of different cells.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Andoniou, C. E., van Dommelen, S. L. H., Voigt, V., Andrews, D. M., Brizard, G., Asselin-Paturel, C., Delale, T., Stacey, K. J., Trinchieri, G. & Degli-Esposti, M. A. (2005). Interaction between conventional dendritic cells and natural killer cells is integral to the activation of effective antiviral immunity. Nat Immunol 6, 1011–1019.[CrossRef][Medline]
Andrews, D. M., Andoniou, C. E., Granucci, F., Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P. & Degli-Esposti, M. A. (2001). Infection of dendritic cells by murine cytomegalovirus induces functional paralysis. Nat Immunol 2, 1077–1084.[CrossRef][Medline]
Arase, H., Mocarski, E. S., Campbell, A. E., Hill, A. B. & Lanier, L. L. (2002). Direct recognition of cytomegalovirus by activating and inhibitory NK cell receptors. Science 296, 1323–1326.
Backer, M. V., Levashova, Z., Patel, V., Jehning, B. T., Claffey, K., Blankenberg, F. G. & Backer, J. M. (2007). Molecular imaging of VEGF receptors in angiogenic vasculature with single-chain VEGF-based probes. Nat Med 13, 504–509.[CrossRef][Medline]
Benedict, C. A., De Trez, C., Schneider, K., Ha, S., Patterson, G. & Ware, C. F. (2006). Specific remodeling of splenic architecture by cytomegalovirus. PLoS Pathog 2, e16[CrossRef][Medline]
Brown, M. G., Dokun, A. O., Heusel, J. W., Smith, H. R., Beckman, D. L., Blattenberger, E. A., Dubbelde, C. E., Stone, L. R., Scalzo, A. A. & Yokoyama, W. M. (2001). Vital involvement of a natural killer cell activation receptor in resistance to viral infection. Science 292, 934–937.
Buller, R. M. & Palumbo, G. J. (1991). Poxvirus pathogenesis. Microbiol Rev 55, 80–122.
Byun, M., Wang, X., Pak, M., Hansen, T. H. & Yokoyama, W. M. (2007). Cowpox virus exploits the endoplasmic reticulum retention pathway to inhibit MHC class I transport to the cell surface. Cell Host Microbe 2, 306–315.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carrasco, Y. R. & Batista, F. D. (2007). B cells acquire particulate antigen in a macrophage-rich area at the boundary between the follicle and the subcapsular sinus of the lymph node. Immunity 27, 160–171.[CrossRef][Medline]
Daniels, K. A., Devora, G., Lai, W. C., O'Donnell, C. L., Bennett, M. & Welsh, R. M. (2001). Murine cytomegalovirus is regulated by a discrete subset of natural killer cells reactive with monoclonal antibody to Ly49H. J Exp Med 194, 29–44.
Henry, S. C., Schmader, K., Brown, T. T., Miller, S. E., Howell, D. N., Daley, G. G. & Hamilton, J. D. (2000). Enhanced green fluorescent protein as a marker for localizing murine cytomegalovirus in acute and latent infection. J Virol Methods 89, 61–73.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jordan, M. C. & Takagi, J. L. (1983). Virulence characteristics of murine cytomegalovirus in cell and organ cultures. Infect Immun 41, 841–843.
Junqueira, L. C., Carneiro, J. & Kelley, R. O. (1998). Basic Histology, 9th edn. Stamford: Appleton & Lange.
Junt, T., Moseman, E. A., Iannacone, M., Massberg, S., Lang, P. A., Boes, M., Fink, K., Henrickson, S. E., Shayakhmetov, D. M. & other authors (2007). Subcapsular sinus macrophages in lymph nodes clear lymph-borne viruses and present them to antiviral B cells. Nature 450, 110–114.[CrossRef][Medline]
Katzenstein, D. A., Yu, G. S. & Jordan, M. C. (1983). Lethal infection with murine cytomegalovirus after early viral replication in the spleen. J Infect Dis 148, 406–411.[Medline]
Krmpotic, A., Bubic, I., Polic, B., Lucin, P. & Jonjic, S. (2003). Pathogenesis of murine cytomegalovirus infection. Microbes Infect 5, 1263–1277.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lee, S. H., Girard, S., Macina, D., Busa, M., Zafer, A., Belouchi, A., Gros, P. & Vidal, S. M. (2001). Susceptibility to mouse cytomegalovirus is associated with deletion of an activating natural killer cell receptor of the C-type lectin superfamily. Nat Genet 28, 42–45.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mebius, R. E. & Kraal, G. (2005). Structure and function of the spleen. Nat Rev Immunol 5, 606–616.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mercer, J. A., Wiley, C. A. & Spector, D. H. (1988). Pathogenesis of murine cytomegalovirus infection: identification of infected cells in the spleen during acute and latent infections. J Virol 62, 987–997.
Mocarski, E. S., Shenk, T. & Pass, R. F. (2007). Cytomegaloviruses. In Fields Virology, 5th edn, pp. 2701–2772. Edited by D. Knipe & P. Howley. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Orange, J. S. & Biron, C. A. (1996). Characterization of early IL-12, IFN-
β, and TNF effects on antiviral state and NK cell responses during murine cytomegalovirus infection. J Immunol 156, 4746–4756.[Abstract]
Phan, T. G., Grigorova, I., Okada, T. & Cyster, J. G. (2007). Subcapsular encounter and complement-dependent transport of immune complexes by lymph node B cells. Nat Immunol 8, 992–1000.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sacher, T., Podlech, J., Mohr, C. A., Jordan, S., Ruzsics, Z., Reddehase, M. J. & Koszinowski, U. H. (2008). The major virus-producing cell type during murine cytomegalovirus infection, the hepatocyte, is not the source of virus dissemination in the host. Cell Host Microbe 3, 263–272.[CrossRef][Medline]
Scalzo, A. A., Fitzgerald, N. A., Simmons, A., La Vista, A. B. & Shellam, G. R. (1990). Cmv-1, a genetic locus that controls murine cytomegalovirus replication in the spleen. J Exp Med 171, 1469–1483.
Schneider, K., Loewendorf, A., De Trez, C., Fulton, J., Rhode, A., Shumway, H., Ha, S., Patterson, G., Pfeffer, K. & other authors (2008). Lymphotoxin-mediated crosstalk between B cells and splenic stroma promotes the initial type I interferon response to cytomegalovirus. Cell Host Microbe 3, 67–76.[Medline]
Shanley, J. D., Biczak, L. & Forman, S. J. (1993). Acute murine cytomegalovirus infection induces lethal hepatitis. J Infect Dis 167, 264–269.[Medline]
Shellam, G. R., Redwood, A. J., Smith, L. M. & Gorman, S. (2006). Mouse cytomegalovirus and other herpesviruses. In The Mouse in Biomedical Research, 2nd edn, pp. 1–48. Edited by J. Fox, S. Barthold, M. Davisson, C. Newcomer, & F. Quimby. New York: Academic Press.
Shibata, S., Yamaguchi, S., Kaseda, M., Ichihara, N., Hayakawa, T. & Asari, M. (2007). The time course of lymphatic routes emanating from the peritoneal cavity in rats. Anat Histol Embryol 36, 78–82.[Medline]
Shinohara, H. (1997). Lymphatic system of the mouse diaphragm: morphology and function of the lymphatic sieve. Anat Rec 249, 6–15.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sinzger, C., Grefte, A., Plachter, B., Gouw, A., The, T. H. & Jahn, G. (1995). Fibroblasts, epithelial cells, endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells are major targets of human cytomegalovirus infection in lung and gastrointestinal tissues. J Gen Virol 76, 741–750.
Smith, H. R., Heusel, J. W., Mehta, I. K., Kim, S., Dorner, B. G., Naidenko, O. V., Iizuka, K., Furukawa, H., Beckman, D. L. & other authors (2002). Recognition of a virus-encoded ligand by a natural killer cell activation receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 8826–8831.
Stoddart, C. A., Cardin, R. D., Boname, J. M., Manning, W. C., Abenes, G. B. & Mocarski, E. S. (1994). Peripheral blood mononuclear phagocytes mediate dissemination of murine cytomegalovirus. J Virol 68, 6243–6253.
Van den Broeck, W. V., Derore, A. & Simoens, P. (2006). Anatomy and nomenclature of murine lymph nodes: descriptive study and nomenclatory standardization in BALB/cAnNCrl mice. J Immunol Methods 312, 12–19.[CrossRef][Medline]
Received 18 August 2008;
accepted 9 October 2008.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. D. Cardin, G. C. Schaefer, J. R. Allen, N. J. Davis-Poynter, and H. E. Farrell The M33 Chemokine Receptor Homolog of Murine Cytomegalovirus Exhibits a Differential Tissue-Specific Role during In Vivo Replication and Latency J. Virol., August 1, 2009; 83(15): 7590 - 7601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |